Index page        Home page  © Copyright2000

CHAPTER 4      PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS AND CHALLENGING BEHAVIOUR

DAVID CLARKE , MEERA ROY

INTRODUCTION

People with learning disabilities, like everyone else, may have a psychiatric illness.  It is important to make a distinction between learning disability which is a “condition of arrested or incomplete development of the mind, characterised by impairment of skills manifested during the developmental period, contributing to the overall intelligence” (ICD-10, WHO) and psychiatric disorder which Michael Rutter defined as “abnormalities of emotions, behaviour, relationships or thinking which are inconsistent with the patient’s intellectual level and of sufficient duration or severity to cause persistent suffering or handicap to the person and/or distress and disturbance to those in daily contact with him or her” (Rutter, et al 1970).  An individual, therefore, can have a learning disability and a psychiatric disorder in addition to it.  The impact of having two conditions could mean that the resulting disability may be more than if either of them existed on their own.

HOW COMMON IS PSYCHIATRIC DISORDER?

Rutter et al (1970) found that emotional and behaviour disorders were more common in children with intellectual retardation.  They found a five fold increase in such disorders among children who had disorders of the nervous system, such as cerebral palsy and epilepsy. Corbett (1979) surveyed children and adults with severe and profound learning disabilities and found that 47% of the children and 37% of the adults had a psychiatric disorder.  Psychiatric disorders occur more commonly in elderly people with learning disabilities than they do in the general elderly population (Cooper, 1997).

CAUSES OF INCREASED PREVALENCE

The lifetime prevalence of psychotic disorders in people with learning disabilities is about five times that of the general population.  There does not appear to be a single cause for it to be so.  This may be the result of interplay of several factors.  A learning disability is often a marker for underlying brain dysfunction or structural damage.  This may itself lead to both the cognitive impairment and the psychiatric disorder.  The psychological “stress” caused by associated disabilities such as epilepsy or cerebral palsy may make the individual more susceptible.  Behaviour and emotional disorder may be the presenting symptom of a physical condition such as a severe respiratory tract infection or thyroid dysfunction.  People with learning disabilities are at risk of having less control over their lives compared to their peers.  This may result in unexpected or unwanted changes, such as a move to an unfamiliar living environment, which may precipitate a psychiatric illness. Any associated communication difficulties may compound a problem such as  bereavement, making it difficult to come to terms with grief.  Social consequences of the learning disability, such as difficulty in finding socially valued employment, may lower self-esteem and contribute to the increased risk of psychiatric disorder. Co-existing epilepsy or a psychiatric disorder in adolescence may result in an individual not attaining their potential.  Other risks factors result from particular causes of learning disability, such as the much increased risk of Alzheimer type dementia associated with Down syndrome. Thus, there is complex interplay of factors which may be responsible for the higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders in people with learning disabilities.

BEHAVIOUR DISORDER OR MENTAL ILLNESS ?

It is important to make a distinction between behaviour disorders and abnormal behaviours which are the result of an underlying mental illness.  When a problem behaviour is the manifestation of a mental illness, e.g. masturbating in public places being a symptom of mania, it is unlikely to respond to behavioural treatment but will disappear with appropriate medication.  However, people with learning disabilities may present with behaviours which are not the result of an illness for a variety of reasons.  It may be that they are bored and not appropriately occupied, or their living environment may be noisy and crowded, with difficulty obtaining attention from carers.  Problem behaviours may arise through attempts to communicate emotions such as misery or anxiety.  The behaviour may be the result of physical discomfort, e.g. constipation or pain, or may be a symptom of an additional disability e.g. stereotyped behaviours associated with autism.  Self injury may have many different functions for one individual and factors initiating such behaviours (such as boredom) may be superseded by other changes (such as effects on neuromodulating compounds that alter pain sensation and mood).  A knowledge of vulnerabilities associated with specific conditions (e.g. proneness to ear infections in people with Down Syndrome and Fragile X Syndrome) allows physical causes of challenging behaviours to be identified and dealt with and, with a knowledge of the person’s coping strategies may identify psychological stressors.

CHALLENGING BEHAVIOUR

The term ‘challenging behaviour’ is sometimes used to describe

 “behaviours of such an intensity, frequency or duration that the physical safety of the person or others is likely to be placed in serious jeopardy, or that behaviour that is likely to seriously limit or delay access to or use of ordinary community facilities” (Emerson, et al, 1987)

and in itself is not a clinical diagnosis.  The onus is on professionals like psychiatrists, psychologists and nurses to make accurate assessments and diagnoses and to help the person with a learning disability.

It is important that accurate diagnoses are made before treating any condition and the diagnosis of psychiatric disorder in people with learning disabilities is no different. Diagnoses are helpful because they predict responses to treatment, and prognosis.  There are certain special issues that merit discussion here.  Any illness can cause an impairment and may lead to disability.  The person with a learning disability is already burdened with one.  An undiagnosed and untreated mental illness will prevent the individual from achieving their potential.  Consider the example of a man with moderate learning disabilities living at home with his parents who shows periodic behaviour disturbance consisting of aggression, hyperactivity and poor sleep.  If the recurrent mood disorder is not diagnosed and treated, he may end up being admitted to a hospital as his parents may not be able to cope.  It may jeopardise his day activities and prevent him from going to the local shops.  Thus, it will impact on his development and quality of life.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis of mental illness in people with learning disabilities can be problematic, especially if the diagnosis is one (like schizophrenia) which depends on the communication of complex subjective experiences to the examining clinician.   Language skills may be limited or absent, depending on the degree of disability the individual has.  People with mild learning disabilities are usually able to communicate how they feel, and it is possible to examine their thought processes.  However, the assessment of whether a belief is truly delusional (i.e. false, held with conviction and not explicable on the basis of the person’s cultural and educational background) may be difficult.  People with learning disabilities may have false beliefs arising from misunderstanding, lack of community contact or due to an autistic disorder.  Auditory hallucinations may be difficult to distinguish from practice vocalisations, conversations with (developmentally appropriate) invisible friends or stereotyped utterances associated with autism.  Similar problems may arise with other phenomena such as thought disorder and a high degree of language sophistication is necessary to describe  passivity phenomena where for example, the individual may feel that they are being controlled (Reid, 1994).  More often than not, people with mild learning disabilities are brought to appointments by family members and carers. It is important to get corroborative history from them to get a comprehensive picture of the difficulties. Another difficulty arises when the carer does not know the person with a learning disability well.

People with more severe learning disabilities and little communication present a different kind of challenge, because they may not be in a position to communicate about their inner world.  Here a longitudinal history from a carer or family member who knows the individual well over a long period of time is crucial.  Changes in sleep pattern, appetite, mood, self help skills and sociability will provide valuable clues in the diagnosis of an underlying psychiatric condition, and it is often possible to establish diagnoses of mood disorders for people with such disabilities. 

Psychiatrists usually rely on their skills in history taking and examination to come to a diagnosis of a mental illness.  It may be necessary to see the individual on several occasions and in a variety of settings where he or she is more at ease, and to interview carers in both day and residential settings, interview family members, and examine previous case notes before a diagnosis can be made.  Rating scales such as the Leicester, Kettering Depression Rating Scale and questionnaires such as the West Midlands Autism Questionnaire and Standardised Assessment of Personality Disorders can be used as adjuncts as well as scales used in general adult psychiatry such as the Hamilton Scale for Depression, etc.

Moss et al (1996) developed the Psychiatric Assessment Scale for Adults with Developmental Disability (PAS-ADD) derived from the Present State Examination (PSE) developed for use within general psychiatry.  The Aberrant Behaviour Checklist (Aman et al, 1985) and Diagnostic Assessment Scale for the Severely Handicapped (DASH) developed by Matson et al (1991) were developed for use with people with severe learning disabilities while the Reiss Screen for Maladaptive Behaviour (Reiss, 1988) and the Psychopathology Inventory for Mentally Retarded Adults (PIMRA, Matson et al, 1984) were developed for use with people with mild to moderate learning disabilities.  These rating scales may be helpful as research tools or to measure change occurring with treatment.

Diagnoses of psychiatric disorders are based on clinical guidelines contained in two classificatory systems.  The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) is the system used by the American Psychiatric Association, the latest version being DSM IV.  The World Health Organisation published the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases, the ICD10, in 1992.  The latter is more commonly used in the United Kingdom.  The WHO introduced the ICD10 Guide for Mental Retardation (this being the commonest term used internationally to describe Learning Disabilities) in 1996.  This guide was prepared to assist those working in the field of learning disabilities to make the best use of the ICD10.

MULTIAXIAL DIAGNOSIS

People with learning disabilities usually have multiple problems.  To describe these adequately, it is usually necessary to use several diagnoses.  The ICD10 Guide for Mental Retardation (WHO, 1996), therefore, recommends a multiaxial system of diagnosis to record different kinds of features in the individual with learning disabilities.  They are as follows:

 

Axis I

The severity of learning disabilities and problem behaviours.

 

Axis II

Associated medical conditions

(e.g. epilepsy, Down Syndrome).

 

Axis III

Associated psychiatric disorders including pervasive developmental disorders, e.g. autism

 

Axis IV

Global assessment of psychosocial disability (using the WHO Short Disability Assessment Schedule)

 

Axis V

Associated abnormal psychosocial situations(e.g. institutional      upbringing)

.

           

Psychiatric disorders have been classified in many ways, most authors making a distinction between severe disorders (such as psychoses, in which reality-testing is impaired) and less severe disorders. Psychoses may be symptomatic (such as the dementia accompanying Huntington’s disease) or “functional” (e.g. schizophrenia).  The term “functional” was used to describe psychotic disorders that were not associated with gross brain dysfunction. It continues to be used, in the absence of a more suitable term, in spite of evidence that disorders such as schizophrenia are associated with subtle changes in brain structure and function, detectable using modern neuro-imaging techniques.  Terms used to describe symptoms of psychiatric illness include delusions - false beliefs that are held with absolute conviction, and that are not understandable give the patient’s social, education and cultural background and hallucinations - perceptions that occur without a stimulus.  They are often auditory (heard), as in schizophrenia, or visual (seen), as in delirious states. It is useful to consider the classes of mental illnesses and their presentation in people with learning disabilities. 

SCHIZOPHRENIA

Schizophrenia is characterised by fragmentation of thinking and delusions and hallucinations of particular, often bizarre, types.  Schizophrenia means ‘fragmented mind’ and its popular use to describe ‘a split personality’ is incorrect.  Schizophrenia may be the end result of more than one illness or process, and for this reason some clinicians prefer the collective term ‘the schizophrenias’.  Fragmentation of thought (often manifest as disordered speech, sometimes by the experiences of having thoughts inserted into or withdrawn from the mind) is a key feature.  Delusions of control or influence, or other bizarre delusions, specific types of auditory hallucinations, movement abnormalities and emotional abnormalities and disorders of the perception of free will may occur. Acts or emotions may be perceived as made or imposed by some external agency (“passivity experiences”).  Different types of schizophrenia are recognised, each with a characteristic pattern of symptoms and course.  Schizophrenia is very rarely associated with dangerously aggressive behaviour to other people.  When this does occur in association with schizophrenia, the person concerned often has other problems such as substance abuse or a personality disorder.

The prevalence of schizophrenia is higher in the learning disabled population (about 3% lifetime risk) compared to the general population (less than 1% lifetime risk).  The prevalence among people with severe learning disabilities is impossible to ascertain because most such people cannot describe the characteristic experiences (Reid, 1994). 

As the diagnosis of schizophrenia and related disorders may be difficult to establish, relatively non-specific categories (such as non-organic psychotic disorder) may have to be used. It may be difficult to differentiate between sub types of schizophrenia. The course of the disorder, and changes which occur over time, should be taken into account.  A decline in social, self care or other skills and development of unusual or apparently irrational maladaptive behaviour may be the earliest manifestation.  Symptoms commonly reported include auditory hallucinations. Unexplained bizarre behaviours which are out of character and sustained in different environments should raise the possibility that the person may have delusions or hallucinations (ICD 10 Guide, 1996).

MOOD DISORDERS

Affective Disorders or Mood Disorders are characterised by disturbances in mood and vitality, resulting in depression (with slowed thinking and impaired concentration, poor appetite, pessimism and ideas of guilt, self-reproach and self-harm) or elation (with euphoria, over-activity, talkativeness and ideas of grandiosity).

Depressive disorders  are characterised by low mood, loss of interest or pleasure in activities which are normally pleasurable, early waking, worsening of low mood in the morning, reduction in activity and appetite, weight loss and reduction in libido.  Depressive illness (or “clinical depression”) differs from everyday unhappiness or understandable low mood through the presence of these additional features, although a depressive syndrome may be precipitated by an event (such as bereavement) that would be expected to cause unhappiness.  Severe depressive episodes may be accompanied by psychotic features such as delusions or hallucinations.  Depressive disorders are associated with a much increased risk of self-harm.  This may take the form of suicide, or more commonly among people with learning disabilities, severely self-injurious behaviour or self-neglect.  Affective disorders usually follow an episodic course, with years between episodes of illness (which usually last for a few months).

Manic and hypomanic states are characterised by elated mood (sustained for several days) accompanied by features such as overactivity, talkativeness, disinhibition, decreased need for sleep and distractibility.  Mania is the more severe form of the disorder, and may be accompanied by delusions or hallucinations.  Bipolar disorders are characterised by recurrent episodes of abnormal mood state, at least one of which has been manic or hypomanic.

Affective disorders (depression, manic-depressive illness and related conditions) are about five times more common among people with learning disabilities, (both mild and severe) and the point prevalence in hospital studies is usually found to be around 2%.

Diagnosis may be hindered by the person’s inability to communicate how he or she may be feeling.  Disturbances in appetite, sleep pattern, interest in activities which give pleasure, self help skills, sexual behaviour and level of arousal are useful indicators. Episodic self injurious behaviour, screaming and withdrawal may often be diagnostic of mood disorders, functioning as depressive “equivalents” (Marston et al,1997).

DELIRIUM AND DEMENTIA

Dementias are characterised by progressive impairments in memory and other cognitive abilities, leading to impaired judgement and thinking.  There is (at least initially), no reduction in the level of consciousness as seen in delirium, and other symptoms (such as emotional liability, irritability, apathy or coarsening of social behaviour) may be present.  For a confident diagnosis, symptoms should have been present for at least six months.

Delirium is characterised by a reduction in awareness of the environment (“clouded consciousness”), memory impairments, disorientation, changes in the pattern of activity (such as increased reaction time) and disturbance of the sleep-wake cycle.

Both dementia and delirium are characterised by the disorientation (the person has a distorted sense of time, where (s)he is, and who other people are), misinterpretation of the environment (e.g. imagining a bedroom to be a prison), and illusions or hallucinations (usually visual - such as seeing bodies fall past a window).

Dementia is associated with some specific causes of a learning disability, notably Down Syndrome (Prasher, 1993).  Cooper (1997) found that the rate of dementia in older people with learning disabilities was four times higher than the general population.  Other causes of cognitive deterioration, like thyroid dysfunction and affective disorder masquerading as dementia, have to be ruled out.  Assessment of adaptive behaviours longitudinally is a useful diagnostic tool.

Delirium may be the result of physical illness or intoxication.  The risk of these disorders is increased among people with learning disabilities due to the presence of associated physical disorders and drug treatments for problems such as epilepsy.

NEUROTIC, STRESS RELATED AND SOMATOFORM DISORDERS

These include phobias (fears of objects or situations), panic disorder (characterised by unpredictable, intense episodes of fear with an abrupt onset, lasting minutes, and with features such as palpitations, sweating, or a feeling of “going mad”), generalised anxiety, conversion (“hysterical”) disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder which is characterised by obsessions (recurrent, unpleasant, intrusive, thoughts which are resisted and which cause distress) or compulsions (actions which the person carries out repetitively while acknowledging that there is no reason to do so).  Compulsive rituals may be difficult to distinguish from stereotyped activities, which are usual among people with autism.  The history of a change in behaviour, and the presence of resistance to the activity, may help diagnosis.  Some recent research suggests that rituals and stereotyped, repetitive behaviours may not be as distinct as previously thought, and may share underlying biological mechanisms.

Some neuroses appear to be common in clinical practice, but this area has been less well- researched than more severe disorders.

EATING DISORDERS

Over eating and unusual dietary preferences are relatively common in people with learning disabilities but eating disorders such as Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia are less frequent.  The factors which are thought to contribute to these disorders like cultural expectations and societal pressures to be thin  may not have affected people with learning disabilities who until recently, were segregated in institutions.  Perhaps they may become more common with the implementation of community care (ICD10 Guide, WHO, 1996).  Regurgitation,  rumination and psychogenic vomiting are seen in people with learning disabilities.

PERSONALITY DISORDERS

Personality Disorders are deeply ingrained and enduring behaviour patterns manifesting themselves as inflexible responses to a broad range of personal and social situations.  Such behaviour patterns tend to be stable and to encompass multiple domains of behaviour and psychological functioning (ICD10, WHO).

Corbett (1979) reported a prevalence rate of around 25% for behaviour/personality disorder in his Camberwell study.  The largest category consisted of people with impulsive or immature behaviour patterns.  Khan et al (1997) found that 31% of a community sample had a personality disorder.

These conditions are more easily diagnosed in people with mild learning disabilities and the associated difficulties may result in contact with the criminal justice system.

AUTISM AND RELATED DISORDERS

Autistic disorders, also called Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDDs) include Childhood Autism, Atypical Autism, Asperger’s Syndrome and some other categories.  They are characterised by impairments in three areas:-

 

·       Language may be delayed, abnormal or absent.  The abnormalities may be gross, with muteness and no development of alternative mans of communication (such as sign language) or subtle, with abnormal intonation, pedantic speech with a tendency to interpret remarks concretely and inability to tailor speech to the social context.

·       Reciprocal social interactions are abnormal, with aloofness, solitariness or awkwardness in social situations; abnormalities of gaze; disinterest or distaste for physical contact and inability to ‘play by the rules’ in conversation.

·       A restricted, repetitive, stereotyped repertoire of interests and activities such as collecting shiny objects or pieces of string; twirling or spinning objects; hand flapping; unusual fears or hobbies (collecting car registration numbers; memorising telephone numbers or bus routes; reciting varieties of carrot); insistence on sameness with intolerance of changes to routines, etc.

 Autism and autistic spectrum disorders are discussed in Chapter 7.

BEHAVIOURAL AND PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS WITH ONSET IN CHILDHOOD

 These include hyperkinetic disorders, characterised by overactivity and deficits in attention; conduct and emotional disorders, and other disorders with an onset that is usually in childhood such as enuresis (bedwetting), tics (sudden, involuntary, rapid, non-rhythmic, stereotyped movements or vocalisations) and Tourette syndrome (combined vocal and multiple motor tics).  Some of these disorders (such as hyperkinetic syndromes and tics) are not uncommon among people with learning disabilities, especially if the learning disability results from a genetic or metabolic abnormality.

Behavioural syndromes associated with particular disorders causing learning disabilities is further discussed in Chapter 3.

ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT

The last thirty years has seen the closure of Learning Disability hospitals and care in the community for people with learning disabilities.  They are no longer considered by professionals and some others as people who should be hidden away from sight and encouraged to take their rightful place in society.  This has meant that they are finally expected to use mainstream services, including health services, for their needs.

The expectation is that people with learning disabilities will go to general practitioners for their physical health problems and will be seen by appropriate hospital doctors, if necessary, to remain well. The psychiatrists in the field of learning disabilities are no longer the right people to look after physical problems, though they still sometimes have to advocate on behalf of their patients.  However, it has been established that people with learning disabilities have higher rates of mental illness compared to the general population and the presentation of the illness requires particular expertise, diagnosis and treatment.  Therefore, people with learning disabilities at the present time appear to need a specialised neuropsychiatric service, but the emphasis for treatment should be that wherever possible, people with learning disabilities should use mainstream services used by other ordinary people.

These issues are further discussed in Chapter 8 on assessment and treatment and Chapter 10 service provision.

When any treatment is provided, attention must be given to the likely benefits and the potential risks.  No effective treatment (biological or psychological) is free of potential unwanted effects.  When prescribing for people whose ability to understand and communicate may be impaired, the tailoring of treatment to maximise potential gains and minimise adverse effects is especially important.  This process entails a knowledge of both the treatment and common adverse effects and problems to which the individual is vulnerable.  For example, a man who has a schizophrenic illness and who is prone to constipation would be prescribed a different antipsychotic drug to a man prone to diarrhoea.

The effectiveness of drug treatments for severe psychiatric disorders has been established beyond doubt, but the treatment of many “challenging” behaviours associated with learning disabilities is empirically based (Clarke, 1997).  This is partly a result of methodological problems with clinical trials (e.g. ensuring adequate numbers of people with the same psychiatric disorder and the same cause and severity of learning disability).  Many reports in the literature describe the treatment of small numbers of people with learning disability, or single cases.  The results often imply that some, but not most, people with a particular problem benefit from the treatment.  Clinicians are, therefore, usually more cautious when using drugs to treat such disorders, because the risks remains but the benefits may not be so clearly established. 

The drugs used in people with learning disabilities to treat mental illness are no different from those used in the general population.  The psychiatrist is guided by the British National Formulary on dosage and side effects.  Schizophrenia, mania and other psychotic disorders are treated with antipsychotic drugs.  Chlorpromazine, trifluoperazine, thioridazine and haloperidol are older drugs with more side effects.  As in general psychiatry, the trend is to use newer, cleaner drugs such as risperidone.  Zuclopenthixol appears to be effective in people who are aggressive.

For patients presenting with a depressive illness, again the trend is to use the newer antidepressants like the Specific Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors such as paroxetine as they cause less side effects.  This is particularly important as they may be on other drugs such as anticonvulsants.  Lithium and carbamazepine are used as mood stabilisers in those with bipolar affective disorders.  Liquid preparations of medication are helpful as sometimes patients may either chew tablets or find it difficult to swallow them.  Depot preparations of antipsychotic drugs are useful in patients where compliance may be questionable.  Electroconvulsive therapy is only rarely used in people with learning disabilities.

When a person with a learning disability has an additional mental illness, medication will only be one aspect of the treatment.  The psychiatrist in learning disabilities is a member of a multidisciplinary team and other professionals will have important contributions to ensure the patient’s well being.  These issues are further discussed in Chapter 8 and 9.  

REFERENCES 

Aman, M.G., Singh, N.N., Stewart, A.W. et al (1985).  The Aberrant Behaviour Checklist:  a behaviour rating scale for the assessment of treatment effects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 485-491.

 American Psychiatric Association (1995) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th Ed.) (DSM-IV, International Version) Washington, DC; APA.

Cooper, S.A. (1979) Learning Disabilities and Old Age.  Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. Vol. 3, 312-320.

Corbett, J.A. (1979) Psychiatric morbidity and mental retardation.  In F.E. James and R.P. Snaith (eds) Psychiatric Illness and Mental Handicap. London: Gaskell.

Clarke, D.J. (1997) Towards rational psychotropic prescribing for people with learning disability. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 46-52.

Emerson, E. Barrett, S., Bell, C. Cummings, R., McCook, C., Toogood, A. & Mansell, J. (1987) Developing Services for People with Severe Learning Difficulties and Challenging Behaviours. Canterbury: Institute of Social and Applied Psychology.

Khan A, Cowan C, & Roy, A. Personality Disorders in People with Learning Disabilities - A Community Survey. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (1997), Vol.41,324-330.

Marston,G.M., Perry,D.W. & Roy, A. Manifestations of Depression in People with Intellectual Disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (1997). 41(6) 476-480.

Matson, J.L., Kazdih, A.E., Senatore, V. (1984) Psychometric Properties of the Psychopathology Instrument for Mentally Retarded Adults.  Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 5, 881-889.

Matson, J.L., Gardner, W.I., Coe, D.A. et al (1991). A Scale for Evaluating Emotional Disorders in Severely and Profoundly Mentally Retarded Persons: Development of the Diagnostic Assessment for the Severely Handicapped (DASH) Scale.  British Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 404-409.

Moss, S., Patel, P., Prosser, H. et al (1993) Psychiatric Morbidity in older people with moderate and severe learning disability.  1: Development and reliability of the Patient Interview (PAS-ADD).  British Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 471-480.

Prasher, V.P. (1993) Down’s syndrome, longevity and Alzheimer’s disease. British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 710.

Reid, A.H. (1994) Psychiatry and learning disability.  British Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 613-618.

Reiss, S. (1990) Prevalence of dual diagnosis in community based day programmes in the Chicago Metropolitan Area.  American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 578-585.

Rutter, M.L., Tizard, J. & Whitmore, K. (eds) (170a) Education, Health and Behaviour . London: Longman.

World Health Organisation (1992) The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines.  World Health Organisation: Geneva.

World Health Organisation (1996) ICD10 Guide for Mental Retardation: Geneva.

Top of Page © Copyright2000