Musa imperialis

Musa imperialis Hort. Vilmorin.

Accepted name There isn't one.
Synonyms  
Authorities  
Section  
Distribution  
Description  
References Cheesman 1947.
Comments An Ensete, one might speculate idly that it was E. ventricosum

From Cheesman 1947:

Pucci in Bollet. Soc. Tosc. Ort., p299 (1906), appears to be a trade name for a species put into commerce probably as a foliage plant.  Orginal not seen.  De Wildeman (1912) lists it as a species of Baker's subgenus Physocaulis.



 


last revision 23 April 2003