As the result of a mistake
by Hutchinson and Dalziel 1936 the story of Musa riperti is a somewhat
confusing one. Cheesman 1947 citing Hutchinson
& Dalziel 1936 gives Musa
riperti as a synonym of Musa
schweinfurthii K. M. Schumann & O. Warburg ex K. M. Schumann (sometimes
abbreviated to Musa schweinfurthii K. M. Schumann) from which he created a
new combination, Ensete
schweinfurthii (K. M. Schumann & O. Warburg) E. E. Cheesman. Baker
and Simmonds 1953 (corrected 1954) then reduced Ensete
schweinfurthii to a synonym of Ensete ventricosum which might appear
to bring Musa
riperti into synonymy with Ensete ventricosum were it not for the fact
that at the same time Baker & Simmonds rejected the name Musa
riperti as being nomen nudum. However, the Musa
schweinfurthii of Hutchinson & Dalziel 1936 is not the same thing as Musa
schweinfurthii K. M. Schumann. Musa
schweinfurthii of Hutchinson & Dalziel 1936 was reduced to a synonym of Ensete
gilletii by Hepper 1968 who at the same time accepted Baker and Simmonds' rejection
of Musa
riperti as being nomen nudum.
Thus by association with Musa schweinfurthii,
a very confusing entity, Musa riperti came to be associated with Ensete
ventricosum
on the one hand and with Ensete gilletii on the other.
Champion
1967 says that Musa riperti is "probably" Ensete gilletii but I do
think he is correct in this matter.
Type:
Aug. Chevalier no. 21567 in Herb. Mus. Paris. |