THE ART
JOURNAL |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. ENGRAVINGS ON STEEL.
|
ENGRAVINGS FROM SCULPTURE.
SCULPTOR. | ENGRAVER. | |
1. MONUMENT TO THE LATE DAVID REID | C. B. BIRCH | H. C. Balding |
2. THE GUIDING ANGEL | L. A. MALEMPRE | G. Stodart |
3. ARMED SCIENCE | JOHN BELL | E. Stodart |
4. THE REAPER AND THE FLOWER | L. A. MALEMPRE | W. Roffe |
5. IONE | T. N. MACLEAN | T. W. Hunt |
6. WHITTINGTON | C. B. BIRCH | G. Stodart |
7. THE WARRIOR AND THE WOUNDED YOUTH . | WILLIAM J. S. WEBBER | E. Stodart |
ETCHINGS. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONTENTS
|
THE ARTISAN REPORTS OF
THE PARIS EXHIBITION.
(OF 1879)
THESE reports comprise a selection from a
number made by special delegates, of whom there were in all more
than two hundred, sent to Paris through the agency of a joint
committee of the British Royal Commission for the Exhibition and
of the Society of Arts. The subjects are Pottery, Glass Art Work,
Mechanical Engineering, Agriculture and Horticulture, Building
Trades, Cabinet Work, Watch and Clock Making, Jewellery and
Optical Instruments, Printing, Textile Fabrics, Leather and
India-rubber, Mining and Metallurgy. Of those which come within
our domain three are devoted to pottery, and one to china
painting. These are all, we believe, by practical designers and
artists one or two of whom made reports on the previous Paris
Exhibitions held in I855 and I867. The names of these reporters
are Frank Harris, Aaron Green, Charles Toft, and J. Randall. The
famous manufactory at Sevres naturally attracted much attention,
especially as the reporters were allowed to see and learn much
more than they were in I867. Moreover, the establishment has been
entirely rebuilt, and both the pottery and the show rooms are
very much more roomy. The reporters' practised eyes soon found
matter of interest. The nature of the clay first struck them ;
they saw several articles formed on the wheel-the old foot-wheel
still used at Sevres-out of the same mass of clay, and were
astonished to find that . the material, after all that working,
felt as tough and tenacious as it did at first. They were
informed that it was a native clay, not an artificial or compound
substance, and that it came from Limoges. It would appear, from
all the remarks of these reporters, that this fact concerning the
clay was not known to our potters ; yet the deposits of china
clay in France are well known to the scientific, and we should
have thought to the practical world also. The reporters were
equally surprised at the admirable arrangement of the furnaces,
and at the perfect cleanliness which reigned everywhere. The use
of wood in place of coal accounts in a great measure for this,
and, besides, Sevres is rather a laboratory than a manufactory,
and the amount of porcelain produced is very small. It was
evident to the reporters that no private potter could possibly
afford such expense as the Sevres arrangements entail. The care
bestowed by the Sevres artists on the tints of the slip and
pigments employed is remarked upon by more than one of the
reporters, as is the fact that in the rooms in which they sat
" the walls were covered with glass-fronted cabinets,
containing birds, shells, seaweed, butterflies, fossils and
drawings," for their use. The modes of alloying the gold
-about which we are surprised there was any secret-the method of
pencilling red and brown shading on the gold, and, generally, the
elaborate care bestowed upon gilding, greatly impressed our
artists. There is much of interest in all that is said about the
Sevres works, but the reader should also consult the notes on the
subject in our Catalogue of the Exhibition, in which is important
information relative to the recent improvements introduced into
the fabrication of this famous porcelain, which evidently did not
reach the reporters. Comparing the present productions of Sevres
with those of our own countrymen, the reporters are highly
favourable to the latter ; but we must refer our readers in the
reports themselves on that head. One fact noted as regards the
Sevres work is of general interest, namely, that nearly all the
large pieces ' are made in several parts ; even small vases, such
as are usually made in one piece, are joined at the foot, and
covered with metal mounts. Of course there is great convenience
in such an arrangement : if an accident occur, only one 'portion
of the object has to be re-made instead of the whole, and the
manipulation and painting become easier. The enormous difficulty
of executing grand vases with complicated handles, all of clay,
decorating and turning them without a flaw, may be imagined ; and
to those who are fully acquainted with such difficulties it seems
surprising that such a feat should ever be accomplished. Then, as
regards the bronze and gilt metal mountings, they frequently
serve to hide imperfections, and so prevent the loss of
labour-already immense-being greater than it is ; but we cannot
conceal our surprise that one of the reporters should find this a
commendable feature in Sevres work ; we have always felt the
contrary, and we believe that metal is never introduced with
porcelain without in some measure interfering with the harmony.
The remarks on the productions of other French potteries are
interesting, especially those relating to the beautiful white
ware, either entirely plain or only slightly decorated : those
amateurs who have resided in France cannot be insensible of the
charm of this beautiful porcelain, sometimes glazed, sometimes in
the form of biscuit, and sometimes with the two combined. A grand
centrepiece; with the base more than three feet in diameter, by
M. J. Pouyat, is especially mentioned as exhibiting extraordinary
difficulties surmounted. It is the opinion of at least one of the
reporters that the artistic work of some other French makers is
quite equal to any produced at Sevres ; and it is hinted that the
famous old factory has done its work, and will probably not long
remain a national establishment. No such information has reached
us, although we are aware of some rather curious changes which
have recently occurred there : there must still be scientific, if
not artistic work for such a national establishment to do with
advantage. In speaking of the remarkable tile-work by. French
artists, the reporters have inadvertently attributed too much to
M. Deck, who can well afford a slight diminution of his high
honours. A portion only of one facade of the Beaux Arts was
executed by M. Deck-the rest was the work of MM. Boulenger, the
other facade was decorated by M. Laebnitz. The names of the
designers, artists, and manufacturers are all given in our
Catalogue notes. We do not remember to have seen the beautiful
exhibition of Oriental tiles and other work by M. Collinot
mentioned in the reports ; this was probably owing to the fact
that the beautiful pavilion of M. Collinot was not in the
ceramic, but in the furniture and decoration section. The
productions of our own potters are of course fully discussed
by the reporters, but they have already been treated, we hope
satisfactorily, in our Catalogue. The Austrian, and particularly
the Viennese porcelain is highly commended by all the reporters
for the elaborate finish of its figure painting, and the lavish
beauty of its raised gold work ; the extreme care and finish
displayed are pronounced marvellous. The Belgian majolica and
decorated earthenware, Swiss faience, Danish unglazed ware,
Bohemian breakfast services, a pair of grand vases in the Persian
style from Morocco, and the beautiful dark green and brown glazed
ware of India are spoken of with much admiration. The
contributions from the United States surprised one of the
reporters, who speaks of Mr. Brewer's vases as quite original,
and as ornamented in good style, and of a bust by the same as a
capital piece of modelling, and who admires some figured trays by
Mr. J. Carter. The admiration called forth by the Chinese, and
still more by the Japanese collections is almost unbounded. The
immense vases, all fired, and well fired too, in one piece,
without any metal bands, handles, or other auxiliaries, the
splendid enamels and colours, the cloisonne work, the
truthfulness of the flower drawing, and the marvellous perfection
of manipulation throughout, are thoroughly appreciated. The four
reports on China and Earthenware contain much useful information
in a compass of eighty pages. Mr. George Bedford's report on
Terra-cotta and other similar ware, such as the Doulton stoneware
and Mr. Lascelles's cement bricks and slabs, is a very
interesting production, affording valuable hints for all who
desire to obtain or increase their knowledge of this beautiful
art. The productions of France, Italy, Austria, Denmark, and
other countries are carefully and fairly criticised and compared
with those of England ; the important element of price is never
forgotten; and there is a good deal of statistical and practical
information in the report. A full report on Glass of all kinds,
by Mr. Joseph Leicester, completes, with the preceding, the
second part of these reports. The reporter goes minutely through
the Exhibition, and shows himself an enthusiast in the beautiful
art of the glass-blower. His remarks are generally judicious. Mr.
Leicester also visited one of the best glass houses in France,
and has given an admirable account of French methods of working,
which differ materially from ours. The second division of the
work contains five reports. The first of these is on Stained and
Painted Glass, by Mr. Francis Kirchhoff. It is short, but we
think complete. The writer thinks that the best French work is as
good as possible, and speaks of the Belgian with high praise,
while condemning the usual German style. For many reasons the
British contributions did not fairly represent the present highly
honourable position of the art in our own country. Mr. William
Letheren's report on Ornamental Ironwork is that of a practical
smith, with very clear notions respecting the principles which
should guide the artist in hammered iron. We think he does full
justice to all, and we cannot but indorse his opinions generally
respecting Belgian, Austrian, and French work in iron. He
protests, and properly so, against the absurd fashion which has
prevailed too long in England of disfiguring rooms with Gothic
branches, fenders finger-plates, and, we may add, coal-scuttles,
and in general designing domestic work on ecclesiastical
principles. Architects of taste do not commit this egregious
blunder. Like all true artists in metal, Mr. Letheren mourns over
the wretched imitations of genuine hammered work, traced and cut
out of a sheet of iron, presenting no variations in thickness,
and none of the crispness and admirable relief which the hammer
produces. Let us not forget, however, that whereas. half a
century or so ago, the very notion of pure hammered metal
ornament was all but lost, we have now hundreds of practical men
who thoroughly understand its value, and many who can and do
produce really artistic hammered work. Two reports on Wood
Carving will be read with interest by those who studied the
examples of this beautiful art at the Exhibition, although they
may disagree with certain judgements; and the general conclusions
and remarks on the opportunities and capabilities of French and
English workmen, and on the methods of Art education, if not new,
are generally fair. With respect to the carving of the Italians
and French, both reporters agree, and we agree with them, that
the former treat it more as a F ine Art, and the French as
decorative and auxiliary ; and again, that the effect of much of
the French work is marred by excessive finish and polish. Lovers
of carving will find at South Kensington specimens of the most
remarkable Italian carving that appeared at the Exhibition. Stone
carving is treated in a terse, practical manner ; the report
contains some useful remarks on French tools and methods, as well
as on Art education, and speaks very highly of the work of the
French stone carver, Three reports are given on Cabinet Work.
One, by Mr .Henry R. Paul, is full and good the respective
qualities of the furniture of France, Italy, and our own .
country are discussed with judgement and impartiality. The
grounds upon which the British cabinet-work obtained so much
attention, and the highest honours of the Exhibition, are set out
very distinctly. Mr. Paul examined some of the best English
specimens with two Parisian cabinet-makers, also appointed to
report nn the subject. He likewise visited the establishment of
M. Fourdinois and that of MM. Damon, Namur & Cie., who employ
six hundred men and two hundred women, and his account of what he
saw there is valuable, as exemplifying the differences which
exist between the two countries with respect to the methods of
work, wages, and other circumstances, besides giving some
statistics of the trade, the importance of which is indicated by
the fact that there are twenty-seven thousand workmen employed in
it, of whom fourteen thousand two hundred and sixty are in Paris.
Two reports on Watch and Clock Making, by Mr. Henry Ganney and
Mr. B. W. Warwick, deserve the careful perusal of all who are
interested in these manufactures. With the exception of marine
chronometers, and perhaps pocket chronometers of the highest
class, England has somehow allowed much of this trade to slip
through her fingers first to Switzerland, then Besarcon, and now
to the United States : the former have succeeded by means of good
technical education and training, and the last by the adoption of
machinery, We cannot imagine a better field for the immediate and
energetic action of the new Guilds' Institute than the raising of
the condition of the Clerkenwell industry, and securing real
theoretical and practical education and training for the rising
generation. The rule of thumb has failed here as in other cases,
and must be dropped. Mr. Edward Kirchhoff contributes a short
report on Jewellery which contains useful hints respecting the
work of the French and Italian jewellers, and the evident
superiority of the gold-plate work of Paris. The reporter cannot
avoid noticing the absence of leading London houses from the
Exhibition, but he points to the beautiful collection of Mr.
Brogden as quite sufficient to show what the best English
jewellers can do, whether in the revival of the styles of the
antique, or in the production of modern work.It appears by this
report that in Paris apprenticeship in the jewellery trade only
extends to four or five years, but that the youths are obliged to
attend technical drawing schools, which are supported by the
employers, so that many of them are tolerably good workmen at
eighteen years of age, while in England they would be apprentices
till the age of twenty-one. Throughout these reports the
recognition of the immense advantages which Parisian workmen
enjoy forces itself on the reporters. " With such
opportunities open to them," says M M. Lambert, "can we
wonder that the French workmen have Acquired for them selves so
high a reputation for intelligence and skill?"