Performance Table (2000/2001)

Wessex

White

Black

Total

2000/01

P

W

D

L

%

Av opp

P

W

D

L

%

Av opp

P

W

D

L

%

Av opp

Performance

Rossiter

6

5

1

92

2299

3

1

1

1

50

2211

9

6

2

1

78

2270

2490

Poulton

3

2

1

33

2303

4

2

2

75

2363

7

2

4

1

57

2337

2387

Corkett

6

3

3

75

2230

5

2

2

1

60

2244

11

5

5

1

68

2236

2369

Yeo

6

2

4

67

2222

5

1

2

2

40

2208

11

3

6

2

55

2216

2252

Simons

6

1

3

2

42

2216

5

2

2

1

60

2185

11

3

5

3

50

2202

2202

Upton

2

1

1

25

2210

7

1

4

2

43

2212

9

1

5

3

39

2212

2132

Willmoth

4

1

1

2

38

2119

7

2

2

3

43

2173

11

3

3

5

41

2153

2088

Neil

4

1

3

25

2212

2

2

50

2142

6

1

2

3

33

2189

2064

Pye

1

1

0

2188

1

1

50

2114

2

0

1

1

25

2151

1958

Howard

6

1

3

2

42

1929

5

2

2

1

60

1708

11

3

5

3

50

1828

1828

TOTAL

44

14

18

12

52

44

13

20

11

52

88

27

38

23

52

 

The average opponent columns take the average of the opponent ratings as used for pairing purposes. For those players without an ELO rating, this is a converted BCF grade (*8+600). The performance column is calculated from FIDE rating tables.

Some of Emily's opponents ratings have been increased to 1687 (350 less than hers) for calculation purposes.

Philip's result of 7/9 against opponents with an average rating between 2251 and 2300 should give him his third and final IM norm. He now needs to get his rating above 2400. The rest of us scored a combined 39/79, just under 50%.


Last modified: May 10, 2001

Wessex Chess Club home page
michael_yeo@new-forest.org