|
Wessex |
White |
Black |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2000/01 |
P |
W |
D |
L |
% |
Av opp |
P |
W |
D |
L |
% |
Av opp |
P |
W |
D |
L |
% |
Av opp |
Performance |
|||
|
Rossiter |
6 |
5 |
1 |
92 |
2299 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
50 |
2211 |
9 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
78 |
2270 |
2490 |
||||
|
Poulton |
3 |
2 |
1 |
33 |
2303 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
75 |
2363 |
7 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
57 |
2337 |
2387 |
|||||
|
Corkett |
6 |
3 |
3 |
75 |
2230 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
60 |
2244 |
11 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
68 |
2236 |
2369 |
||||
|
Yeo |
6 |
2 |
4 |
67 |
2222 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
40 |
2208 |
11 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
55 |
2216 |
2252 |
||||
|
Simons |
6 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
42 |
2216 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
60 |
2185 |
11 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
50 |
2202 |
2202 |
|||
|
Upton |
2 |
1 |
1 |
25 |
2210 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
43 |
2212 |
9 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
39 |
2212 |
2132 |
||||
|
Willmoth |
4 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
38 |
2119 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
43 |
2173 |
11 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
41 |
2153 |
2088 |
|||
|
Neil |
4 |
1 |
3 |
25 |
2212 |
2 |
2 |
50 |
2142 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
33 |
2189 |
2064 |
||||||
|
Pye |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2188 |
1 |
1 |
50 |
2114 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
25 |
2151 |
1958 |
|||||||
|
Howard |
6 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
42 |
1929 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
60 |
1708 |
11 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
50 |
1828 |
1828 |
|||
|
TOTAL |
44 |
14 |
18 |
12 |
52 |
44 |
13 |
20 |
11 |
52 |
88 |
27 |
38 |
23 |
52 |
The average opponent columns take the average of the opponent ratings as used for pairing purposes. For those players without an ELO rating, this is a converted BCF grade (*8+600). The performance column is calculated from FIDE rating tables.
Some of Emily's opponents ratings have been increased to 1687 (350 less than hers) for calculation purposes.
Philip's result of 7/9 against opponents with an average rating between 2251 and 2300 should give him his third and final IM norm. He now needs to get his rating above 2400. The rest of us scored a combined 39/79, just under 50%.
Last modified: May 10, 2001
Wessex Chess Club home page