Performance Tables (2003/2004)

First Team

Wessex1           White             Black             Total    
2003/04 P W D L % Av opp   P W D L % Av opp   P W D L % Av opp   Performance
Poulton 4 2 1 1 63 2312   2   1 1 25 2397   6 2 2 2 50 2340   2340
Upton 5 2 3   70 2171   4 2 2   75 2139   9 4 5 0 72 2157   2323
Allicock 6 3 3   75 2148   4 2 1 1 63 2200   10 5 4 1 70 2169   2318
Corkett 7 2 5   64 2231   4 2 1 1 63 2183   11 4 6 1 64 2214   2316
Simons 4 1 3   63 2265   7 2 4 1 57 2238   11 3 7 1 59 2248   2313
Brameld 1 1     100 2096   1   1   50 2144   2 1 1 0 75 2120   2313
Hopkins 2 1 1   75 2135   1   1   50 2113   3 1 2 0 67 2128   2253
Webb 4   2 2 25 2258   7 1 4 2 43 2290   11 1 6 4 36 2278   2176
Yeo 5   3 2 30 2199   6 1 3 2 42 2182   11 1 6 4 36 2190   2088
Neil 1   1   50 2195   1     1 0 2144   2 0 1 1 25 2170   1977
Khoo,T 4 3 1   88 2022   3   1 2 17 1799   7 3 2 2 57 1926   1976
Norman 1   1   50 2072   1     1 0 2082   2 0 1 1 25 2077   1884
                                             
TOTAL

44

15

24

5

61

   

41

10

19

12

48

   

85

25

43

17

55

     

The table excludes two default losses and one default win but includes Teresa's loss against the Micromarkets NWE substitute (which counted as a win). The performance numbers are based on the FIDE rating system. Teresa's opponents with ratings more than 350 points different have had their ratings adjusted. Ian, Rawle and Martin will gain a number of ELO points as will Teresa as two of her opponents were unrated. Richard and I will lose a packet.

Second Team

Wessex2           White             Black             Total    
2003/04 P W D L % Av opp   P W D L % Av opp   P W D L % Av opp   Performance
Rutter 6 2 2 2 50 2256   4 2 1 1 63 2202   10 4 3 3 55 2234   2270
Pye 3   2 1 33 2289   5 1 3 1 50 2263   8 1 5 2 44 2273   2230
Hopkins 3   2 1 33 2261   3 1 1 1 50 2161   6 1 3 2 42 2211   2154
Brameld 3 1 1 1 50 2022   3 1 2   67 2101   6 2 3 1 58 2062   2119
Taylor 1   1   50 2120   1   1   50 2028   2   2   50 2074   2074
Footner 2 1 1   75 1867                 2 1 1   75 1867   2060
Gregory 3 1 1 1 50 2110   3   3   50 2009   6 1 4 1 50 2060   2060
Ferrington               2 1 1   75 1848   2 1 1   75 1848   2041
Clark 4 2 1 1 63 2115   4   1 3 13 2119   8 2 2 4 38 2117   2030
Pleasants 4 1 1 2 38 2071   5   2 3 20 2177   9 1 3 5 28 2130   1964
Norman 4   3 1 38 2008   4 2 2   75 1752   8 2 5 1 56 1880   1923
Tunks 3 1 1 1 50 2074   3     3 0 2155   6 1 1 4 25 2114   1921
Marsh 2   1 1 25 2020   2   2   50 1959   4   3 1 38 1989   1902
Khoo,S 1     1 0 2102   1 1     100 1304   2 1   1 50 1703   1703
                                             
TOTAL 39 9 17 13 45     40 9 19 12 46     79 18 36 25 46      

As before, opponents with ratings more than 350 points different have had their ratings adjusted, although this time there were a number of instances where the Wessex player was the weaker one. Curiously, most players performed better with Black rather than White.


Last modified: June 29, 2004

Wessex Chess Club home page
michael_yeo@new-forest.org