Performance Table (2004/2005)
| Wessex1 | White |
Black |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
| 2004 - 2005 | P |
W |
D |
L |
% |
Av opp |
P |
W |
D |
L |
% |
Av opp |
P |
W |
D |
L |
% |
Av opp |
Performance |
|||
Corkett |
6 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
50 |
2400 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
70 |
2390 |
11 |
3 |
7 |
1 |
59 |
2396 |
2461 |
|||
Rutter |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
75 |
2225 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
75 |
2225 |
2418 |
|||
Upton |
5 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
40 |
2415 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
38 |
2495 |
9 |
0 |
7 |
2 |
39 |
2450 |
2370 |
|||
Clark |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
67 |
2274 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
50 |
2248 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
63 |
2267 |
2362 |
|||
Allicock |
6 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
50 |
2372 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
30 |
2407 |
11 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
41 |
2388 |
2323 |
|||
Simons |
6 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
58 |
2376 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
17 |
2343 |
9 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
44 |
2365 |
2322 |
|||
Webb |
4 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
13 |
2454 |
7 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
36 |
2405 |
11 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
27 |
2423 |
2248 |
|||
Evans-Quek,S |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
2469 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
25 |
2317 |
7 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
14 |
2382 |
2073 |
|||
Yeo |
4 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
25 |
2273 |
7 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
14 |
2342 |
11 |
0 |
4 |
7 |
18 |
2317 |
2055 |
|||
Evans-Quek,D |
5 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
20 |
2171 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
30 |
2184 |
10 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
25 |
2178 |
1985 |
|||
Pye |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2217 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2217 |
||||
TOTAL |
44 |
8 |
19 |
17 |
40 |
43 |
5 |
17 |
21 |
31 |
87 |
13 |
36 |
38 |
36 |
The table excludes Debbie's default win. The performance numbers are based on the FIDE rating system. Debbie's opponents with ratings more than 350 points different have had their ratings adjusted. Tony and Ian will gain a large number of ELO points. Suan and I will lose a packet.
| Wessex2 | White | Black | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2004 - 2005 | P | W | D | L | % | Av opp | P | W | D | L | % | Av opp | P | W | D | L | % | Av opp | Performance | |||
| Clark | 3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
2096 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
63 |
2015 |
7 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
79 |
2050 |
2280 |
|||
| Pleasants | 5 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
60 |
2114 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
60 |
2126 |
10 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
60 |
2120 |
2192 |
|||
| Taylor | 1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
50 |
2058 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
75 |
2067 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
67 |
2064 |
2189 |
|||
| Tunks | 1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
1965 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
33 |
2216 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
50 |
2153 |
2153 |
|||
| Ferrington | 6 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
75 |
2114 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
25 |
2116 |
10 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
55 |
2115 |
2151 |
|||
| Pym | 6 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
50 |
2083 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
60 |
2119 |
11 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
55 |
2099 |
2135 |
|||
| Gregory | 3 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
50 |
2148 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
50 |
2121 |
9 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
50 |
2130 |
2130 |
|||
| Hopkins | 4 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
50 |
2250 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
13 |
2231 |
8 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
31 |
2240 |
2099 |
|||
| Pye | 2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
75 |
2072 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2142 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
50 |
2095 |
2095 |
|||
| Rutter | 5 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
30 |
2185 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
50 |
2156 |
9 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
39 |
2172 |
2092 |
|||
| Khoo | 3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
67 |
1945 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
67 |
1927 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
67 |
1936 |
2061 |
|||
| Marsh | 2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
25 |
2168 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
50 |
2167 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
33 |
2168 |
2043 |
|||
| Norman | 1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
1720 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
50 |
2007 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
67 |
1911 |
2036 |
|||
| Dams | 2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
50 |
2008 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
50 |
2008 |
2008 |
|||
| TOTAL | 44 |
16 |
20 |
8 |
59 |
44 |
11 |
20 |
13 |
48 |
88 |
27 |
40 |
21 |
53 |
Quite remarkable that the team came so close to relegation with performances like these! Ian will gain a lot of rating points, especially when combined with his first team results. Most others will gain a few points. No-one had a really bad season (unlike the first team).
Last modified: June 1, 2005
Wessex Chess Club home page