INTRODUCTION TO THE MECHANISM OF HOLOGRAPHIC CONTROL

(July, 1998)

By Noel Huntley, Ph.D.

**Why
is the control holographic? Here, we only need answer that it is infinitely superior
to any other system and is a natural manifestation of all the universe's computer
principles, for example, the kinesthetic sense, referred to above, is also the
memory.**

**Why is it a superior system? Let us
give a simple answer to this question with an analogy. Consider a scale of control:
systems ranging from very poor control, to perfect control. At the bottom of this
scale we could place the activity of striking a ball with a bat. There is a little
control over the ball's direction and position at the moment of impact with the
bat. No more control can be exercised after impact and there is no access to the
ball's whereabouts, that is, no direct reference (except of course by projection
from its initial conditions at the moment of impact).**

**Let
us now move up this scale of increasing control. We could tie a piece of string
to the ball, or object. As we pull on the string we move the object. We are in
virtually continuous but indirect contact with the object. It is clearly still
a very poor method. The string connects the object to a reference system, but
it is flexible. Let us make it rigid as we ascend the scale of increasing control.**

**Consider
a thin rigid rod connected to the object. This definitely provides us with greater
control. The object's motion and position is easily predictable as the other end
of the rod is moved about. We now have an efficiency commensurate with the coordinate
axes method in our mathematics. A location in the plane of X and Y can be referenced
accurately by means of the axes, X and Y, that is, in two dimensions. This can
easily by extended to three dimensions by adding a Z axis. However, it doesn't
matter how many dimensions we add we do not have a system which is highly directionally
versatile and it is deficient in what we can call contiguity of reference and
also context. It works only under the special axes conditions specified. The system
is highly preferential. A strong failing in the tests of truth in physics. What
we are stating here will become clearer as we move on now to the top of this scale
of increasing control.**

**At this level we have
the universe's holographic control method. Let us go back to the demonstration
of the object and the rigid rod. We now imagine an infinite number of such rods
(if the rod was infinitely thin) connected all around the object such that the
rods merge and form a solid sphere encompassing the object. **

**We
can now envisage that if we were somehow in contact with the total surface of
this sphere, because of its rigidity and its complete circumferential contiguity
in all directions, we would also be effectively in 'contact' with the object at
the centre.**

**As an application at this point
we could imagine the whole solar system enveloped by this sphere, and the object
is, say, our planet Earth, embedded a distance from the centre where the sun is
located. If we imagine spinning this rigid sphere we can recognise the great stability
of the planet Earth in its orbit. The implication is that each element making
up the volume of the solar system is contributing towards the motion, accuracy
and predictability of the planet.**

**Compare
this with the Newtonian system of the balance of a centrifugal force and a gravitational
force holding the planet in a 'stable' orbit. If this were the only mechanism
the whole universe would fall apart in seconds. But what about Einstein's relativity
you might ask? Einstein's geometrical interpretation of gravity and his space
curvature are in fact direct properties of the holographic machinery. Relativity
unfortunately does not have an understanding of the mechanism behind Einstein's
space topology.**

**Let us return to the object
embedded within the rigid sphere. We now replace the rigid spherical envelope
with infinitely superimposed quantum fields. At this stage, if one doesn't have
any conception of superimposed quantum fields, one can merely imagine these as
electromagnetic, electrical, or energy fields. These fields are just as effective
in producing complete rigidity. There are no discontinuities or interstitial emptiness
in this configuration. **

**At this point, the
idea is to appreciate that the whole volume of this 'sphere' is contributing towards
the motion and identification of the entity's location. It may appear that for
this particular volume of energy field there could not be any further connections
to the object, since it is surrounded by them completely. However, this is not
the case. The holographic control is higher dimensional. This means the energy
sphere extends in time. This extension though is spatial, that is, all at once.
The diameter of the spatial 3D energy sphere must be imagined as having a diameter
in time--it is 4D. What does this mean? It means that
future positions of the object within this span in time are all contributing to
the object's motion in present time. There is a holistic
relationship between all parts, in both space and time, of this particular span.
For instance, the degree of this span (unification or integration), in the subject
of learning patterns, involved in physical skills, is the precise measure of the
ability achieved (skill, technique, coordination).**

**We
might see that a system which utilises the space all around an object and also
the space in time, forms the basis for maximum control of, and access to, the
object. In fact a 4D system is absolutely essential. A 3D configuration can have
no true control since it can't 'predict' the immediate future by sensing it now,
and therefore doesn't know where to go (we are talking about self-contained instantaneous
quantum mechanisms).**

**Now the intelligent reader
may say this is all very well but all you have done is transferred the same problem
we began with to another level, that is, from the object to the new surface---we
have apparently gone from how to control the object to controlling the enveloping
spherical fields! **

**Firstly, we have yet to
handle this 'outer' surface of these fields as to where they go or fit into the
scheme. Secondly, we have achieved something already. We have connected the idea
of controlling a surface to controlling a volume. The above argument implies that
the surface of the object is not absolute but relative; that the energies of the
object extend externally and also internally. For a spherical object, picture
infinite concentric spheres (touching) extending outward and inward. (The reader
may by all means use the model of the tesseract---a cube inside another cube with
the corners connected---if it helps.) As we shall see later this is the essential
energy framework of the atom and in fact all natural entities.**

**The
subject of nature's computer system is an immense one, and as the reader can see
we have only touched the surface of one particular facet, holographic control,
with barely a reference to holographic properties. This will be elaborated upon
in proceeding articles.**