There is clearly a need for a scientific theory of creation. There
are many established subjects that current science fails to explain adequately
and, in fact, ignores completely as not even valid or worthy of consideration.
For example: spirituality, religion, the paranormal, nature of consciousness and
mind. We don't even have a proper science of mind—the brain is the principal
focus. Mainstream scientific community will point out that the mind is merely
a by-product of the brain; and even more disastrous, that consciousness' causative
role in life is an illusion—and again a by-product of the brain.
We might note that we have scientific theories of the universe and life, for example,
the Big Bang theory and Darwin's theory of evolution, but no one has produced
a science of creation. We may well ask why. Science will state it is simply because
scientific methodology cannot accept or tolerate a non-scientific term such as
‘God'; that is, a concept which is a substitute for everything without explaining
anything.
The New Science, however, can do much better than this. The
more scientifically-inclined individual tends to think that a disagreement with
religion must take an opposite standpoint to that subject. This is actually not
a very rational response and this is what creates the atheist. The atheist is
simply opposing religious dogma, that is, he or she is only opposing a religious
interpretation—which may be an old man with a white beard sitting on a throne
in the sky. If there were no inadequate religious descriptions of God, Atheists
would probably be agnostics. Atheists are generally intelligent people and when
they become aware of the incredible physics of the inner-space regions of the
holographic fractal system, interest in a completely different direction will
be awakened.
The word ‘creation' relates of course to religion, based
on a world created by God. We shall be using science as far as possible to develop
this viewpoint. Firstly, why can't we just bring together science and religion.
These two subjects should be a single body of knowledge, but they have been set
up in a polarity relationship; each will destroy the other if a reconciliation
is attempted on that level. Science is imbalanced towards the objective, and even
tries to eliminate all subjectivity. Religion is biassed towards subjectivity—beliefs
and faith—with the dangers of falsehoods being introduced knowingly or unknowingly.
The objective and the subjective are two sides of the same coin—you can't
have one without the other. A proper academic course on the relationship between
objectivity and subjectivity would resolve many issues, including the greatest
scientific debate between Einstein and Bohr. (Ref.1)
In reconciling science
and religion one must find the hidden contexts that are in conflict and then introduce
the higher-order context, which then places each of science and religion in proper
perspective—each is then a partial quantum reduction of the higher context
and can be unified within this context, forming, say, a spiritual science or whatever
one wishes to call it. This is explained in other works by the author. (2)
As far as possible we shall conform to acceptable scientific protocols in
formulating a theory of creation, even leave out the word ‘God' and let the
reader contemplate this meaning. In any theory of creation it is so easy to fall
into the trap of ‘infinite regression', meaning in this case to question
what came before. When an origin requires some explanation one can so easily expose
the inadequacy by asking, ‘What came before that?' And repeatedly go into
an infinite regression.
A theory of creation must
satisfy as far as possible all tests of truth in physics—dualism, infinite
regression, preferential formats, generalisations and symmetry, etc. Fortunately
we have terms acceptable to science, such as ‘infinite' and ‘absolute',
both of which do not evoke a prior cause. Mainstream science studies essentially
the particle interpretation of reality, and any wholeness is simply an aggregate
of particles held together (or interacting) through forces. This is a composite
whole and not a true whole or integration. In a composite whole, the whole equals
the sum of the parts. In a natural or harmonic whole—all features of natural
creation—the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. The latter case
is the key to life and ultimately a valid creation theory.
A proper study
of the relationship between the whole and the part would be found very revealing
and, in particular, the recognition of the whole as an undivided unity—a
quantum state. Note that the New Science Theory of Creation recognises (as does
orthodox science) the wavelength as a natural whole unit—that it can't be
divided. (Though in fact it would be made up of particles below even the recognised
subatomic realm, all functioning coherently for one large quantum pulse; the wave
is switching on and off—amplitude increasing and decreasing—as it propagates
in wave form.)
As more observations are made and
evidence gathered on the whole/part relationship it will become clear that the
whole is hierarchically dominant over the part.* The whole will be the master
control over the part, whether it is an organ (whole) over the cell (part) or
a president over the lower ranks, or the wholeness of a work of art as opposed
to the part level (say, bits of paint stuck together by forces), or the holographic
learning pattern in skills, spanning a group of movements, rather than individual
motions—independence of fingers is achieved by increasing control via greater
wholes of movements. (3) *[Use the figures at the end of the article where helpful.]
We thus find that there is a special relationship between integration (whole)
and differentiation (parts) and that this combines with holographic fractal principles.
Thus if the part/whole relationship within nature and the universe is fractal
and holographic we then know that all systems of creation begin with the whole,
and then divide into parts, for example, the highest fractal level of a tree is
the tree trunk (whole), which comes before the twigs (part).
In fact all
that mainstream science has to do to reverse its fundamental tenets (in the correct
direction) is to recognise the significance of the structures, holographic and
fractal, and how they relate to creation—for example, the learning pattern
in skills, which is a 4D holographic template that houses programmes and converts
nonlinear information into linear information. In fact the learning pattern is
an ideal example of the relation between integration and differentiation, which
clearly indicates the whole determines the part. (4) The whole (a large wave)
carries the smaller parts (fractal waves). (5)
A thorough research into
the workings of the learning pattern by the author shows that accuracy and fine
control over actions (differentiation) is greater the greater is the organisation.
The wholeness, quantum state, or the amount of movements spanned as one whole
is the determining factor. For example, in keyboard technique, the more movement
activity the learning pattern can span simultaneously (integration), the greater
the independence (differentiation) of finger action. (6) There is an extremely
important relationship between integration and differentiation. (7)
Let's
say this again in a much simpler example. A stimulus response association between
two elements; for example, in Pavlov's experiments with dogs, the two items to
be associated are bell sound (stimulus) and salivating (response). These two factors
don't just stick together as science appears to assume, with no logical explanation.
The connectivity is frequency resonance and is achieved by a single quantum state
of consciousness or attention. The attention must span the two events in time,
bell sound and salivation to form the connection—of which the two factors
stimulus and response are then under the control of a third component, a single
quantum state (see triad principle (8)).
Why doesn't science recognise
these greater wholes, these coherent states? Simply because the method of detection
used, scientific methodology, is in itself a lower order than these coherent states,
causing collapse of the wave function to the particle level. The mind and consciousness
only, can potentially access higher orders without this quantum reduction (collapse)
to lower truths. Science is failing to recognise the natural principle of orders
and their degrees. (9)
The whole, however, even if a coherent energy
state, is still quantitative and fails the infinite regression test. It would
thus be unacceptable physics to regard this as a true beginning, even if we called
it the ‘Holy Spirit' (think of a homogeneous unified field everywhere). We
must go beyond this, that is, beyond particles/antiparticles, waves, frequency
patterns, space and time, since these are all characteristics of a relative system
and are quantifiable.
We must introduce concepts that science cannot question
by asking, for instance, ‘But what came before that?' Fortunately we have
the ‘absolute' term and ‘infinity' or ‘infinite', such as in the
‘quantum realm of infinite possibilities'. Both states ‘absolute' and
‘infinite' are acceptable within science. A beginning state, which is absolute
and infinite, cannot have any degree of objectivity since the latter means there
is separation. This ‘separation' would immediately imply a finite condition,
such as containing particles, waves, space and time.
The Absolute must
thus contain ‘nothing'* since everything that is something is finite. The
Absolute (also called the 'Unmanifest') will be infinitely subjective from a scientific
viewpoint and this is, in effect, science's definition of ‘nothing'. However,
in the New Science Theory of Creation this absolute infinite is very ‘substantial'.
For example, it includes the quantum realm of infinite potential possibilities.
*[Note the inverted commas here: There can be no such thing as actually nothing.]
The model of God and all creation is most simplified by the fractal-tree analogy
explained thoroughly in the author's other material. The God concept is clearly
at the tree trunk fractal level. We would now imagine three large branches extending
from the trunk (the triad principle or the Trinity) (10) and continuing to multiply
in fractal levels, branches to twigs. This is a template, a formatting system
to provide different degrees of orders for different aspects of consciousness
to explore by activating and selecting from its infinite possibilities within
the quantum realm.
The most important concepts of knowledge on this planet
tend to be presented in reverse—to put it bluntly. The obvious one is that
life comes from matter, rather than as in the New Science that matter (a much
lower order) comes from life (high order). This might be considered to lead to
the ultimate enigma, or simply a joke on mankind. Observations on the basis of
the top-down principle (‘trunk' first) and not science's bottom-up (‘twigs'
first) principle, tell us that we begin with the Infinite and Absolute. Then from
this, quantum-reduce this highest state, that is, format it, to produce finite
properties in a scale of decreasing subjectivity (and therefore increasing objectivity),
a gradient change from internal to external, forming dimensional levels in this
holographic fractal system for the exploration of consciousness. For this system,
the Absolute must express in relative terms.
The Absolute must go from
an infinite condition to a finite one if it is to explore its infinite possibilities.
This is achieved by interface systems between the absolute and relative; the holograph
and fractal mechanisms satisfy this requirement. The fractal gradient is achieved
by imagining extending out ‘telescopically' the different orders inherent
within the holograph. This results in a gradient of increasing degrees of objectivity
as we move away from the subjectivity of the Absolute down this scale. In effect,
the Absolute expresses outwards/downwards by an incremental system of imposed
limitations.
How does the Absolute create these limitations? Firstly since
this is a theory of creation we can take the liberty of resorting to thought
as primary. All the Absolute has to do is to counteract a portion of itself, which
manifests two opposing flows. This state, experientially, is the same as denying
that portion. This action creates a degree of objectivity (one part of Absolute
self separates from another).
Now the big problem
for science here is the dualism of the Absolute (which has potential energy),
that is non-physical, and the relative states of existences (particles, waves,
space and time). How can Absolute ‘nothing' achieve a ‘something'? Taking
liberties with creation's thought process we can mitigate this objection by considering
there is a kind of condensation (catalytic action). On this basis we can present
a weak analogy for this (in particular, it must not have dualism in it, itself).
Consider the two states of matter, solid and vapour. We can use a fine mist
(water droplets) for the vapour and consider it invisible, and in dualistic contrast
use ice as the solid. We imagine that through ignorance we consider there is a
dualism between these apparently incompatible aspects, the solid, and an intangible
one, the vapour. To us of course there is no dualism, the vapour is a different
state and can be condensed into water, then frozen into ice. Thus the idea is
that the Absolute, by thinking outside itself (looking at self or denying a part)
by counteraction, creates a degree of objectivity—a separation giving the
first essence of energy (which is a flow) and matter (which is balanced counteracting
flows).
Let us return now to the subject of creation and its constructive
limitations. Keep in mind the triad principle in which a single overseeing state
can act independently of the divided parts, which automatically manifest a lower
status. That is, the two opposing states of the Absolute, denying a portion of
itself, are automatically overshadowed by the original (undivided) Absolute. In
fact the Absolute is extended into countless portions, atoms, plants, races, planets,
etc. with a fractal gradient of overseeing levels all the way back to the Source,
the undivided Absolute.
When one part counteracts another part of itself,
a degree of objectivity is created and a separate viewpoint manifests. Each doesn't
know the other across that separation but if there is access to the whole Absolute
‘above', then they may take on the whole, the original One again. This counteraction,
two opposing flows, forms the basis of polarity, a balanced condition which prevents
the motion (waves/energy) from dispersing and thus creates stable structures.
The second significant step would be to form the structure of a template (for
a particular form). A template would be a specific mathematically-organised morphogenetic
field. The same flows that created this would be passed into this form-holding
pattern/mould bringing about manifestation.
We imagine now the extension
or divisions continuing down the fractal scale, forming dimensional levels with
barriers imposed between levels to prevent all the parts from merging back into
Source. These constructive limitations are of course very much manipulated by
negative beings, for example, the natural dimensional separation between the 3D
spectrum (our world) and the higher 4D spectrum—the soul level—is abused,
controlled, and reinforced, creating a barrier. (11)
Thus the different
degrees of these ordered dimensions are created by the Absolute imposing different
degrees of not-knowing by the counteraction principle from which degrees of separation
(of the Absolute) are achieved, with subsequent objectivity (resulting in portions
becoming a state of unconsciousness relative to another).
In considering the return of portions of consciousness back to Source, we see
that basic intelligence and evolution is ascension to higher orders (of the holographic
fractal multiverse). In religion this is what holiness means, becoming more holy;
more whole (of consciousness), a higher order. Higher orders are achieved by qualitative
states of behaviour, which quantum regenerate greater wholes.(12) By creating
integration within the lower level, that is, harmony and alignment (for example,
putting parts into resonance), the inherent higher orders (that already exist)
are catalysed, that is, drawn in and the state is raised to that higher level—the
higher the order, the greater the frequency.
Thus cosmic creation is a
system of formatting the Absolute into relative quantities (entities, such as
atoms, planets, species, etc.), containing a portion of that absolute. The formatting
technology is the template. This will act like a mould, selecting the different
finite orders required from the absolute ‘medium' of infinite nonlinear possibilities
for the exploration of consciousness. (The ocean analogy described in other work
is useful.) (13)
The interface between the input mind (that portion of
the Absolute) and the mind mechanism itself is actually like the perfect, or ultimate,
cyborg system (in principle). That portion of the Absolute, for example, the human
pure consciousness (not soul since this includes higher orders of mind) is extended
(also similar in principle to bionics) by the machinery of particles and waves,
so subtly that one can't tell where it changes from ‘nothing' the nonquantifiable,
to the ‘something', the quantifiable. This is what science should be studying;
the interface between the Absolute and the relative---the answers to everything
lie in this interval. [The author, in studying the nature of the learning pattern
in skills, using introspection, identified by direct inner perception the interface
between the input consciousness and the learning pattern (mind computer system).]
The fractal law allows specific levels (degrees of order) of the extended holograph to be quantum-reduced into material existences in which formatted portions of the Absolute express in a specific dimension. This can be a dimensional framework, such as 3D or a physical organic vehicle (human body), consisting of particles, waves, space and time. This is a formatting procedure so that the subjective infinite Absolute can express in finite ways to extract its possibilities. Thus the fundamental purpose of life is simply existence in finite realities for the exploration of the absolute infinite possibilities (there are of course other purposes: missions, contracts, programmes).
This is a creation theory
but as far as possible it is being made compatible with science and scientific
terminology, allowing of course for a fundamental turn around in the cause and
effect principle, that is, New Science's top-down instead of science's bottom-up.
The first basic clarification for the foundations of a creation theory
is that science must recognise that in life, surrounding us ubiquitously, there
are a few nonquantifiable characteristics. Let us list these and the quantifiable
properties.
Nonquantifiable aspects:
The ‘aliveness' property;
the experiential characteristic; and basic sentience or awareness/consciousness.
Quantifiable
aspects:
Particles, waves, field systems, frequency patterns, holographic
and fractal systems, templates, universes, mind, brain, body, all energy patterns
whether detectable by scientific method now or after millions of years of development
in scientific instrumentation.
Nonquantifiable characteristics are direct
properties of the Absolute and can never be detected by scientific methods. A
relative can never evaluate or understand an absolute. However, since all life's
aspects, consciousness in different forms, are portions of the Absolute, life
can (or we can) intuitively know such a state by its own nonquantifiable characteristics;
the experiential or basic awareness/sentience/knowing by being.
What else
can be evaluated from the fundamentals? As we have implied, the holographic fractal
system is a natural product of formatting an interface between the Absolute and
the relative. Can we derive anything further from this? The infinite Absolute
of no particles, waves, or space and time must be considered to be infinitely
nonlinear (a difficult concept). The Absolute cannot really be divided since it
is inherently holographic and infinitely nonlinear. When any separation or objectivity
appears to occur, every part, no matter how small, contains the whole and manifests
on a lower dimensional level of the fractal organisation of ordered natural limitations
(dimensions, degrees of freedom/randomness). The total state of knowing is not
proportionately available except by ascension up the fractal hierarchy.
This
is where we arrive at expressions such as: ‘Everything is everywhere at once;'
‘As above, so below, as within, so without; 'What is here is everywhere,
what is not here is nowhere'. Each part is everywhere in the whole—the whole
has no right or left, or up or down, or front or back. Thus the Absolute expresses
out by a system of imposed limitations.
How can we justify assuming that
the Absolute is infinitely nonlinear? If it wasn't it wouldn't be complete and
would have finite aspects, meaning something or something has ‘preferred'
a beginning state (that the origin has already been selected, implying an earlier
cause). This would thus fail as a ‘test of truth' in physics. ‘Tests
of truth' are reliable, for example, ‘generalisation'. If a principle (or
law) explained a few phenomena, and then we find it generalises to more phenomena,
its degree of truth is increasing (since it is a higher order than first evaluated).
Or if one scientist discovers particles are spherical, and another scientist says
they are cylindrically shaped, then we go for the spherical, since it is the same
shape for all observers/viewpoints (moving round the object). The cylinder has
a preferential axis, that is, will be rejected as not being fundamental. This
is similar to comparing the relative encoding system (selected by man) of our
computers, which is algebraic in nature; not natural as is the case of nature/mind
that utilises geometry, a universal absolute system. The basic geometry is spheres
within spheres (higher-dimensional vortices). We can easily see the fractal levels
of a tree (twigs, branches, larger branches to trunk), they are projected out
in 3D from the hidden vortices within inner space, which would appear as spinning
spheres within spheres and be recognised as holographic. The universe would be
similar but more complex. (14)
As we have implied, the holographic mechanism
is a composite system of different orders, and the fractal scale begins with the
highest order (for example, trunk of a tree). We might see some similarity between
this description of the holograph (with different orders), and the hierarchy of
universe dimensions created from the infinite nonlinear Absolute.
Thus
anything less than infinite completeness (infinitely nonlinear) has a preference
and must be unacceptable in a sound and logical theory. Realise that normal thinking
assumes that an imaginary solid 3D uniform entity is complete (totally ‘filled
in'). But the simultaneity, the superposition and the superimposition in an infinitely
nonlinear manner gives an imaginary infinite density. Thus all creation must be
a (quantum) reduction from the greatest whole to finite, formatted aspects appropriate
to the dimension to be explored; that is, assigned to a corresponding limitation
for the exploration of its infinite possibilities. These states are limited orders
in a limited dimension with prospects of ascension to greater possibilities and
orders.
How might this universe system or cosmos begin? Retaining a logical
approach as far as possible we can say that western religion, starting with ‘God'
(creator of all), ‘projects out' the Trinity (Holy Spirit, Father and Son).
In the New Science, the first state, Spirit, would be a neutral energy state.
This state would of course be subject to considerable physics speculation---scalar
energy would be our best choice. However, we can call it the unified field from
which everything springs—the whole of this would correspond to the Holy Spirit
(note the words ‘whole' and ‘Holy' from the same root). Since this can
be considered to be way beyond current scientific knowledge, it is acceptable
as a temporary speculation for a theory. The other two entities in the triad would
follow the Holy Spirit and would have to be the magnetic and the electrical. Remember
this would be a vast division; the ‘One' extending into three. All entities
are/contain a corresponding portion of the Absolute, which have the nonquantifiable
characteristics. With our definition of Absolute, every piece of creation, atoms,
species, planets, has a portion of the nonquantifiable characteristics, such as
consciousness, the experiential, etc. And that includes the templates (morphogenetic
fields) themselves which hold those portions. [* A neutral energy with the electric
and magnetic components inherent within it.]
Since this is a creation
theory we need to occasionally make the links to religious knowledge. We agree
with quantum physics that underlying all creation are frequency patterns filling
all space, matter, dimensions, etc. Now basically a frequency contains a sound
component (this is scalar infra sound) and a light component (electromagnetic).
Christianity, in the creation of the universe, refers to the ‘word of God',
and ‘then there was light'. In a scientific creation theory we find that
‘word' is referring to sound—thus the (scalar) sound energy came first—this
will also be found to create the scalar-sonic magnetic component. Then there was
light, which is now the electric (electricity) component. Note that on a higher
level, magnetism comes first, not electricity, as emphasised by current science.
To recap, the whole (Absolute) thus limits itself down a gradient scale, the
holographic fractal hierarchy, reducing degrees of order and unification, increasing
objectivity and separateness, to experience and discover these relative states,
forever qualifying itself and forever becoming. This is a continuous down-stepping
process of formatting the degree of order and reducing frequencies. The human
body is a vehicle; a formatted system of energies to match the environment and
enable the being to move around. The brain formats the mind and steps down the
higher frequencies so that the mind can communicate to the body and environment.
The mind in turn formats the consciousness, which is already formatted into 3D
in transmitting from the soul level, through the planetary field system and the
human DNA. Note that between the selected dimensional fractal levels there is
apparent randomness for freewill.
The process by
which this system is achieved is one in which the Absolute simply denies a portion
of itself—this is a counteraction—that portion is still living but is
separate from the origin. Immediately a degree of space (objectivity) is created—with
the potential for time. But the original state remains and oversees the divided
self or selves in this fractal hierarchy.
A very important feature of
the New Science, and another example that indicates how backward we are on this
planet, with no science of the mind, there is no understanding of the principle
that to every action there is a consequence (and the New Science will recognise
this as universal). In particular, and of considerable interest is when the action
is detrimental to life or truth in some manner. We call this karma on our planet,
but this is only a reflection of the larger universal principle which might be
referred to as an immune system or even an antivirus programme. The purpose is
to protect the universe and life in general.
Think of it as follows.
The multiverse is fractal and holographic at a basic level since it all came from
the Absolute, which is inherently whole, all parts in the expressed/materialised
universe are, at the basic level, in harmony. The elements of the holographic
mechanism from small to whole are aiding one another; are in phase. No flow of
energy currents are out of mathematical alignment—it is an aligned system
(this is what Divine means, such as in sacred geometry). Recall that consciousness
coming into this universe system has gone through a series of energy formatting
processes as explained above, the final product, say, the human being, is endowed
with countless fields in different formats, frequencies and template geometries
(99% (not detectable by current scientific instrumentation) extending up the fractal
system. Many of these fields are aligned with the universe—planets, stars,
galaxies, etc.
Keep in mind the holograph/hologram as an aligned, holistic
system, each portion is supporting every other portion on all scales. If we personify
this we can say that it has a higher standard of integrity and therefore ethics
than humans are displaying on this planet.
The important point to be made
now is when, say, the human carries out a harmful action on another. In terms
of physics, this is a counteraction within the integrity of the whole system.
For one unit of life to harm another to the detriment of the whole that unit must
block off the viewpoint (or already be blocked) of the other. This is an impairment
in the mind. Moreover, as each act is recorded in the mind of the perpetrator
there is an incremental conversion of consciousness into unconsciousness. (15)
'Negative' consciousness (negative conflicting wave patterns) is consciousness
containing repressed unconscious recordings.
Note the holographic property
of the whole within the part. For the reader not familiar with the structure of
the holograph, if we cut up the hologram photographic plate to any size, the full
holographic image will be projected when the laser is shone through. This is a
quantitative mechanical reflection of an Absolute property. Thus a tiny speck
of the Absolute within, say, an atom has a tiny degree of intelligence and consciousness,
but its higher components (or aspects of consciousness leading all the way back
to the infinite Source, God) are restricted deliberately (by design). Nevertheless
the tiny spark of God essence has a line to Source; not to mention that the human
state similarly connects back to the Source.
This
means our natural state (prior to massive formatting) is the essence of
the quantum realm (the quantum reality is consciousness). That is, a state of
no time or space (as we know it), a state of pure wholeness, totally inviolate
in this condition and (relative to us) functioning on simultaneousness, multidimensionality,
instantaneousness, superposition and superimposition. It is easy to see that flashes
of religious enlightenment could occur but quickly translate into intellectual
quantitative properties of spacetime, particles, waves, and the memory of the
multidimensional experience is lost. It is also easy to see how science can become
stuck in the quantitative mode—of tiny parts stuck together by forces. The
parts are separate, that is, not in harmony. The original portion of the Absolute,
the (whole) quantum of consciousness endowment, is not detected (wave function
collapsed) and science will assign reality to the part. On this planet, consciousness
is essentially lost in the complexities of matter and machinery. Consciousness
has lost touch with what it is.
What we are trying to say here is that
the ‘craziness' of the quantum reality (quantum physics) is normal for consciousness—this
indicates how lost we have become. This is why perception of unity is so lacking
on this planet and there is deterioration in understanding true art and music,
and even behaviour, in fact, qualitative states, in general, are degrading to
quantitative states. The true path of intelligence and evolution/ascension is
via behaviour, such as responsibility, integrity, ethics, benevolence, humility,
etc. These are all frequency patterns that are in cooperation with the natural
universe and will guarantee the best path of survival (in an existence such as
ours), the path of the higher orders in the fractal system. It is a question of
re-alignment with the (Divine) energy patterns of creation. This is what is meant
in religion when one refers to getting back to God.
After
all the discussion about what the universe is, what does the New Science tell
us about the human? Clearly we are taking the stance that the human being is not
just a brain and body as orthodox science teaches.
The human is infinitely
more complex—and we mean infinitely. Firstly, we have a brain and body, both
of which degenerate during a typical life (due to the state of the DNA). Secondly,
however, there are many more features that do not deteriorate. There is a mind,
a complex energy system of frequency patterns, and an input to this mind, which
we relate to our viewpoint, the true self identity, the conscious mind.
This
input, however, is not just a portion of the Absolute. It contains higher orders
of mind (inner-space particles and waves of higher frequency). There is now a
fractal system of conscious minds extending up the hierarchy; what we have referred
to as higher aspects of consciousness. The next fractal level ‘above' us
is the abode of the soul. Thus the soul is a superior, higher aspect of our 3D
mind consciousness. We (here) don't have the soul as much as it has us—that
is, we are extensions of the soul. At this soul level its input, which is now
the second-order mind, contains also the higher orders, third, fourth fractal
levels, and so on up the hierarchy. This is what we meant by stating the human
is infinitely more complex.
The dimensional system is a standard three
orthogonal dimensions (directions at right angles). At our first fractal level
it is denoted by D1, D2, D3. Note that dimensions D2 has a higher frequency spectrum
than D1, and D3 higher than D2. The second soul fractal level, has dimensions
D4, D5, D6. The next level D7, D8, D9 has been called the oversoul level, and
so on. This is the most satisfactory design layout of the dimensions and has been
corroborated by Guardian extraterrestrial material. (16) One can now see how complex
the human being is—having a mind that goes all the way back to the Absolute
just as a twig connects all the way to the trunk.
What changes would be
required for current orthodox science to be compatible with the New Science Theory
of Creation? The many changes (listed in the book The Emerging New Science) would
automatically be revealed by science recognising us on the first fractal level
3D of the holographic hierarchy of dimensional orders, then removing the barrier
between the third-dimensional spectrum and the fourth. Science would then be elevated
from a nonharmonic science with technologies that produce pollution, harmful energies
and limited energy sources, to a harmonic science from which would be derived
abundance of harmonious energies. For example, antigravity and its associated
knowledge fits above the 3D-4D boundary, taking it into the realm of harmonic
science (and free energy in the home—no cost). Unfortunately any scientific
pioneer or even a university professor researching antigravity will be warned
(which may take the form of ridicule) and the experimental data suppressed. (17)
Let us finalise with a summary of some of the supportive features for the New
Science Theory of Creation.
1) The gradient from the Absolute to the relative automatically invites the fractal system---a scale of reducing different degrees of order to provide dimensional platforms for the exploration of the infinite possibilities of the quantum realm.
2)
Quantum physics, the most advanced science on the planet, provides us with the
'realm' of infinite possibilities (infinite wisdom in religion?).
3) The
Absolute/Infinite must be 'whole'---no objectivity (finite), and therefore have
no particles, waves or space or time (it is 'unmanifest').
4) This Absolute passes all the tests of truth in physics; no infinite regression, no dualism, no preferential formats; it has perfect symmetry, ultimate generalisation, and covariance.
5) The hologram, with which we are very familiar today, provides the basic interface between the Absolute and the relative (between unity and particles or fragmentation) and further, forms the basis for the fractal system. Moreover, all fractal systems begin with the greatest order (top down), and project down.
6) The philosophical maxims like, 'Everything is everywhere at once', are well founded in the New Science. Also supported within quantum physics where the physicist refers to the particle as being everywhere when it is not observed, or all electrons appear to be one big electron (everywhere) until observed. This is the infinitely nonlinear Absolute. One may also see that the hologram is a natural (quantitative) expression of the infinite superimposition and the 'everywhere at once' state.
The following figures, taken from other author articles and books, can be used to aid understanding of the above text.
Figure 1, taken from the book: The Emerging New Science.
Figue 25, taken from the book: The Original Great Pyramid and Future Science.
Figure 25, taken from the book: The Emerging New Science.
Figure 26, taken from the book: The Original Great Pyramid and Future Science.
References:
1.
Book: The Emerging New Science.
2. Ibid. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk.
Article: The Fractal Tree.
3. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Articles
on skills, and book: Attainment of Superior Physical Abilities.
4. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk.
Article: The New Education—Reconciling Science and Religion.
5.
Book: The Emerging New Science.
6. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Articles
on skills, music and physical abilities.
7. Book: The Attainment of Superior
Physical Abilities.
8. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Article: The New
Education—Triad Principle.
9. Book: The Emerging New Science.
10.
www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk, Article: The New Education—Triad Principle.
11.
Book: The Original Great Pyramid and Future Science.
12. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk.
Article: Quantum Regeneration: A Major Scientific Omission.
13. Book:
The Emerging New Science.
14. Ibid.
15. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk.
Article: The Mechanics of Karma.
16. Book: Voyagers vol.2 by
A. Deane.
17. Book: The Emerging New Science.