Although
this case has nothing to do with trees, it is used as a principle for other cases which do
involve trees. The plaintiff owned a colliery with mine shafts that reached under the
land of the defendant. The defendant built on his land a water reservoir, with its
position located over the mine shafts. Many of the mine shafts were old and disused. The
soil between the mine shafts and the base of the reservoir was unable to support the
pressure of the water and subsequently collapsed causing the water to flood the mine. The
plaintiff sought damages from the defendants in the Court of Exchequer Chamber in Feb
1866. Judgement was given to the plaintiff and the defendants appealed.
During the appeal it was held that, if a person brings or keeps anything on his land
that should later escape and is a cause of damage to neighbouring properties, the owner is
responsible for its effects no matter how careful he has been to retain that item.
In this situation the owner of the burst reservoir was judged as being responsible for
the damages so their appeal was dismissed. |