The Role of lordship centres in Pictish society by Marian Youngblood
Duffus Castle, Gordonstoun, Moray: one of the great Pictish strongholds to survive and change with the times. Its present form shows mediaeval battlements, built on top of Pictish ramparts which, like neighbouring Burghead, may date to the first century A.D.
‘He held his household . . .
Sometyme at Edinburgh, sometyme at Striveline,
In Scotlande, at Perthe and Dunbrytain,
At Dunbar, Dunfrise, and St. John’s Toune,
All worthy knights more than a legion,
At Donydoure also in Murith region’
Jhon Hardyng, 1465
The subject of royal lineage brings out the romantic in the scholar and the scholar in the romantic. Lordship
or kingship in a Pictish context has been given both treatments over centuries of scholarship, each with its
version of history. Increased tolerance between disciplines allows students of literature, language and art
history to communicate with archaeologists and pre-historians in renewed attempts to investigate the role of
royal centres in the Pictish kingdom. Pictish kings and sub-kings ruled a nation which grew from a loose
confederation of tribal groups in the third century to become a major political and landowning force at the
time of their takeover by the Scots in the ninth. To describe them as a lost society is to ignore the sources.
An effort is made here to demonstrate that the ethos of those early Historic royal centres, far from being
lost, has become incorporated within our culture and has meaning for us today.
As much as it is aided by modern techniques, our perspective can be clouded by modern thinking. Fealty,
faith, heroism and violence are not fashionable concepts. Yet they were an integral part of a power centre, as
important as glitter of armies or riches in landholding. Early Celtic neighbours held mutual respect for oral
recitation of lineage, bravery, protection of one’s people and hospitality. Anyone reading the 6thC Welsh
Gododdin of Aneurin, an heroic poem glorifying the last battle of king and nobles of Traprain, cannot but
marvel at the imagery of that aristocracy whose lineage hailed from 5thC Christian Votadini of treasure-hoard
fame. It is, however, difficult to gain an understanding of Pictish hierarchy in the kingdoms North of the
Mounth, because historical documentation was hindered by remoteness from clerical centres. Physical and
literary evidence is still slight; but recent scholarship accepts a correlation between Irish sources such as the
Annals of Ulster (AU), Annals of Tighernach and fragments carefully compiled by Skene (1867) as more
accurate than previously supposed, albeit with an Irish slant (Clancy, 1996; Wormald, 1996).
In the time of Bede, (AD673-735), the Pictish nation was geographically divided by the Mounth into those
southern Picts living on ‘this side of the steep and desolate mountains which separate them from the
provinces of the northern Picts’ (HE III, 4). While we may never know more about early land divisions,
confederations and system of leadership than the mythology of the Pictish creation legend (‘Irish and Pictish
Additions to the “Historia Britonum”’, Skene, 1867), later Pictish kingship (500-800) at times held power
greater even than that of the Scots. Early 7th century kings of Fortriu controlled from a lordly centre near the
Earn allegiance, agriculture, and armies with impressive force. They also had access to skilled labour - artists,
masons, carpenters, architects, even military engineers (Alcock, 1988). In this respect they were no different
from their Dalriatan neighbours across Druimalban, the spine of Britain (Adomnan V.C. II 46), except in
exploitation of fertile land. But no Scots king ever commandeered the Columban Church in quite the same
way as Nechtan, son of Derilei (706-729), controlled the Church in Pictland. After gleaning all necessary
detail from Anglian Jarrow on ecclesiastic propriety, ritual and usage, and borrowing skilled architects to help
him build a stone church (HE V, 21), Nechtan expelled the resident familia of Iona in 717. Royal control
persisted for the next 170 years until the time of northern king Giric, son of Donald son of Alpin (878-889)
who, according to Chronikil of Kings, ‘first gave freedom to the Scottish Church which was under servitude
until that time after the custom and manner of the Picts’ (Mackenzie 1830).
From mid-6thC until final assimilation by Scots, c. 843, Pictish aristocrats administered land tenure - exacting
tithes or allegiance through kinship in exchange for protection - while fostering a thriving industry in decorative
and domestic materials from the centre of an all-powerful local lord.
He in turn was subservient to the next in rank, sub-king or High King, whose central fortress would have
been rich in trappings of authority, controlling fertile agricultural ground, also with highly-skilled masons,
metalworkers and woodcarvers at his call. Bridei son of Maelchon (d.585), ‘powerful’ king of the Picts north
of the Mounth lived in such a fortress, Brudei munitio (V.C II 35) near Inverness It had obvious wealth in its
size (Alcock, 1992), impenetrable position, its great wooden doors barred against Columba when visiting on
his first mission; Adomnan describes Bridei’s other powerful asset: his personal Druid, Broichan, wise-man in
chief, consulted on augury, keeper of knowledge and laws, magician-in-residence who could raise and still
storms (V.C II 34). Not only was Bridei’s stronghold large enough for royal family, retinue, advisors and
slaves (V.C II 33), but it housed hostages taken as a means of insuring the loyalty of an Orcadian sub-king
(V.C II 42).
Such northern fortresses, like Burghead, (Small, 1969) Dundarg (AU, 729) and Dunnottar (AU, 681, each
sited within reach of a fertile plain, were prime targets for siege-and-burn raids because of wealth, real or
imagined, which could be carried off as booty. As neither side paid its army, the promise of treasure hoards
in exchange for military allegiance was an important factor in maintaining a functioning force (Wormald,
1996)
Lordship centres had to access surplus food supplies in order to feed workers temporarily removed from
agricultural production in peacetime or soldiers during siege; this implies rich landholdings immediately
adjacent, land in a wider radius, or, in time-honoured fashion, plundering one’s neighbours. Terraces on the
slopes of Dundurn indicate immediate access to a food harvest, albeit outside the walls (Ralston, 1997).
Records indicate Dunnottar, on the Mounth’s eastern extremity, was besieged more than once (AU, 681,
694?). Its fortified position, set on towering cliffs, bounded on three sides by the North Sea and defended on
the remaining narrow strip to mainland fields by bank and ditch enclosures (Alcock, 1992), is perhaps the
most dramatic of northern warlord centres. It may have been a much-prized potential conquest for Bridei son
of Bile, southern Pictish ‘King of Fortrenn (genitive of Fortriu) in his siege of Fothair in 681. Under him great
armies fought the battle of Nechtansmere near Dunnichen in 685, resulting in Pictish independence from
Northumbria (Anderson, M. 1973/80). Northern warrior aristocrats may have had just as powerful armies at
their disposal marshalled from equally impressive royal seats. Dubhtalorc, 8thC ‘rex Pictorum citra Monoth’
(d.782, AU) probably ruled from just such a fortress ‘on this side of’ the Mounth.
Status and wealth were directly related. The larger the citadel, the more land it controlled; but it had the
burden of producing more to feed its dependents. Food had to be grown in abundance to stock a royal town
(urbs or civitas of Bede, (HE I1). Whereas for a small dun crops could be grown locally, in a larger province
centred on a major fortress a higher proportion would be tithed and collected as tribute from widespread
tenantry (Clancy, 1996).
The chief seat of a district while heavily fortified, ritually protected in the 5/6thC (multivallate Burghead was
ringed on the landward side with circa 30 carved bull stones), may by the 9thC not have needed such
fortification. It would still, however, have administered all surrounding landholdings, including that of the
church - not ‘given liberty’ until the reign of Giric (878-889), above; Henderson, 1967). Jewellers and
metalworkers working full-time produced rich adornment for aristocratic overlords both local and, through
gift-giving and hospitality, in distant kingdoms. Generosity appears as a mark of status (MacQueen,
1961/90). Hospitality was a key feature of tribute given and received among princely equals. But feasting was
appreciated by all: the best way in which a warlord could thank his warriors in advance for services to be
rendered in battle was to ‘feast them all for a year’ (Song of Taliesin, Matthews, 1991).
After all, they might not return.
As law-giving and government became sophisticated, so negotiation between noble confederacies changed
from violent bloody encounters to political and matrimonial alliances sealed over the feasting table with
Mediterranean wine (Alcock, 1988).
Forteviot, an elite capital of later kings of Fortriu, seems to have centred on a glorious palace - palisaded, but
not as formidable as neighbouring Dundurn, (AU 683) - with feasting hall, royal church of decorated stone,
and Christian burial ground. Strategically set in lush Strathearn on the Water of May, its landscaping is more
relaxed than iron-nailed ramparted Dundurn: suggesting perhaps fewer raids in more enlightened times. It is
possible, however, that it could afford to show affluence, as protection came from a line of fortresses,
Dundurn among them, similar to the line of promontory forts as coastal guardians of Banffshire. It was
spiritually guarded from above by 8/9thC Class II (Christian) carved stones , of which Dupplin and
Invermay crosses are only two (Alcock, 1992). From the reign of Bridei son of Bile, d.693, kings of
Fortriu seem to have enjoyed overkingship, as the term Fortrenn is used in annals with dual meaning
denoting kingship as well as head of a dynasty (Smyth, 1984).
carved arch from Forteviot
The Dupplin cross, in particular, may demonstrate the importance of Fortriu as supreme kingdom. Its
inscription celebrates Constantine, among the last of the Pictish kings, (Forsyth, 1995). ’Custatin filius
Forcus’ (Urgust) ruled Pictland from Fortriu in 789, assumed kingship of DalRiata by 811, and retired to
monastic St. Andrews (Cillrighmont) where he died, 820.
Forteviot had prestige and precedent. Pictish capital at the height of its power, it ministered to an orderly
nation accustomed to hierarchy based on allegiance developed over a millennium. No wonder to the Scots
who subsequently ruled there - at least for a time - it was the ultimate prize.
The bard was asked who of the kings of Prydein
is most generous of all
‘And I declared boldly
That it was Owain’
The Gorhoffedd, 12thC heroic poem
Bibliography: The Role of lordship centres in Pictish society: Marian C. Nagahiro
AU Annals of Ulster; date, where indicated, is year of mention in Annals
Adomnan VC(Vita Columbae), see below, Sharpe, R. (Ed).
Alcock, L. (1988) ‘The Activities of Potentates in Celtic Britain, AD500-800: a positivist approach’. Power
and Politics in Early Medieval Britain and Ireland. Driscoll & Nicke (Eds.)
Alcock, L & Alcock, E.A. (1992) ‘Reconnaissance excavations on Early Historic fortifications and other
royal sites in Scotland, 1974-84; 5:A, Excavations & other fieldwork at Forteviot, Perthshire, 1981; B,
Excavations at Urquhart Castle, Invernessshire, 1983; C, Excavations at Dunnottar, Kincardineshire, 1984’
PSAS 122, 215-285.
Anderson, M.O. (1973/1980) Kings and Kingship in early Scotland Edinburgh & London
Bede HE(1990) Sherley-Price, L. and Farmer, D.H. trans./ed Bede Ecclesiastical History of the English
People. see below Sherley-Price, L
Clancy, T.O. (1993) ‘The Drosten Stone: a new reading’ Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of
Scotland 123, 345-353.
Clancy, T.O. (1996) ‘Iona, Scotland and the Céli Déi.’ Crawford, B.(Ed.) Scotland in Dark Age
Britain,St John’s House Papers no.6 St Andrews, 111-130. Scottish Cultural Press, Aberdeen
Cowan, Edward J. (1984) ‘Myth and Identity in Early Medieval Scotland’. Scottish Historical Review
Volume LXIII, 2: no.176 111-135
Forsyth, K. (1995) ‘The Inscriptions on the Dupplin Cross’. From the Isles of the North: Medieval Art in
Ireland and Britain. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Insular Art, Belfast, April 1994,
Belfast
Henderson, I. (1967) The Picts. London.
Hudson, B (1994) Kings of Celtic Scotland. Westport, Connecticut
Mackenzie, J.W. (1830) Chronicle of the Kings of Scotland from Fergus the First to James the Sixth
in the year M.DC.XI. Maitland Club, Edinburgh
MacQueen, J. & W. (1961/90) St Nynia: with a translation of the Miracles of Bishop Nynia. Edinburgh
Matthews, J. (1991) The Song of Taliesin: Stories and Poems from the Books of Broceliande. London
Ralston, I. (1990) ‘The Green Castle and the Promontory Forts of North-East Scotland’. Scottish
Archaeological Forum(SAF 10)27-40 Edinburgh
Ralston, I.B.M. & Armit, I. (1997) ‘The Early Historic Period: an Archaeological Perspective’. Scotland:
Environment and Archaeology: 800 BC - AD 1000 Edwards, Kevin J and Ralston, Ian B.M. (eds)
Edinburgh
Sharpe, R. (1991) Adomnan of Iona: Life of St Columba. Penguin, London
Sherley-Price, L. & Farmer, D. (Trans.)(1990) Bede:Ecclesiastical History of the English People with
Bede’s Letter to Egbert & Cuthbert’s Letter on Death of Bede. Penguin, London.
Short, S. (trans.)(1994) The Gododdin. Llanerch.
Skene, W.F. (Ed.)(1867) Chronicles of the Picts, Chronicles of the Scots and other Early Memorials of
Scottish History. HM Register House, Edinburgh.
Small, A.(1969) ‘Burghead’. Scottish Archaeological Forum (SAF-)61-68 Edinburgh.
Smyth, A.P. (1984, 1995) Warlords and Holy Men: Scotland AD80-1000. Edinburgh University Press,
Edinburgh.
Taylor, S. (1996) ‘Place-names and the early church in Eastern Scotland’ Scotland in Dark Age
Britain,Crawford, B. (Ed.) St John’s House Papers no.6 St Andrews, 93-110. Scottish Cultural Press,
Aberdeen.
Watson, W.J. (1926) The History of the Celtic Place-Names of Scotland. Rhind Lectures 1916,
Blackwood, Edinburgh & London.
Wormald, P. (1996) ‘The Emergence of the Regnum Scottorum:a Carolingian hegemony?’ Crawford,
B.E.(ed.) Scotland in Dark Age Britain, St. Andrews 131-147
©1998 Marian Youngblood
contact Friends Of Grampian Stones by e-mail
©1998-2004 Friends of Grampian Stones - Editor: Marian Youngblood