One thing have I desired of the LORD, that will I seek after;
that I may dwell in the house of the LORD all the days of my life  (Psalm 27:4)
© Elizabeth McDonald     http://www.bayith.org     bayith@blueyonder.co.uk
Please note that the inclusion of any quotation or item on this page does not imply we would necessarily endorse the source from which the extract is taken; neither can we necessarily vouch for any other materials by the same authors, or any groups or ministries or websites with which they may associated, or any periodicals to which they may contribute, or the beliefs of whatever kind they may hold, or any other aspect of their work or ministry or position.

Bayith Home  |  Foundations  |  Political Cultural and Social Issues

Islam
A Totalitarian and Fascistic Political, Religious, and Supremacist Ideology
aka: The Religion of Peace

"And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him"  (Genesis 16:12).

"For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another.
Not as Cain, who was of the wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him?

Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous"
(1 John 3:11-12).

"It becomes important for us to clarify to the West in unequivocal terms - yet again - why we hate you and why we fight you ...
We hate you first and foremost, because you are disbelievers, you reject the oneness of Allah ...
The fact is ... our primary reason for hating you will not cease to exist until you embrace Islam.
Even if you were to pay jizyah and live under the authority of Islam in humiliation, we would continue to hate you ...
there is indeed a rhyme to our terrorism, warfare, ruthlessness, and brutality"
[Dabiq, No.15, pp30-31, quoted at
source].

Finsbury Park Revenge Attack

Quotes and Comments

Actions and Reactions, Islamophobia, Moral Equivalence, Double Standards

Government Failure to Protect Its People --> Vigilantism   |   Dhimmis, Appeasers, Quislings, Virtue-Signallers

Fifth Columnists and Trojan Horses   |   'Moderate' Muslims   |   The Mainstream Media and Press

Piers Morgan 'Interviews' Tommy Robinson   |   UK's Mosques   |   The 1400 Year War   |   Secularism and Bigotry

When Truth Disappears   |   The Curse of Cain   |   The Burden Which Habakkuk the Prophet Saw   |   Please Pray For...

Finsbury Park Attack: Articles and Videos   |   The Migrant Crisis   |   The Rape Jihad   |   The Rotherham et al Rape Jihad

Islam: Articles Page   |   Islam: The Religion of Peace   |   Political Islam   |   Acts17Apologetics


"So long as there is [the Koran], there will be no peace in the world"
[Sir William Ewert Gladstone, PM of Britain, 1868-74; 1880-85; Feb-July 1886; 1892-94]

"Didn't Newton explain that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction?" [source].

"It's axiomatic that, if the state won't protect the people, the people will protect themselves" [source].


 

Actions and Reactions, Islamophobia, Moral Equivalence, Double Standards


"No sane person would condone the Finsbury act of terrorism. No intelligent person would say it was unpredictable, especially if he studied physics at school. Didn't Newton explain that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction?"
[source].


"Everything and everyone has a breaking point. When a stone is put under increasing pressure, nothing visible happens till it finally disintegrates in a fraction of a second"
[comment at source].


"This will only become more frequent until the Media/Government start dealing with Islam and speaking honestly about it"
[comment at source].


"If you allow society to degenerate to the point where there is less and less in common to bind competing groups together, there we will be action... but just as surely there will - slowly, eventually, belatedly - be reaction. And the most obvious reaction is to reach for the same weapon your opponent's got on you: In the cold war, the Communists acquired nukes. In the culture war, the right is storming the stage
[at the recent leftist production of Julius Caesar at Central Park]. In the jihad, the Islamophobe rented a van" [source].


"One cannot begin to solve a problem until (i) one accepts there is a problem (ie. put an end to denial), (ii) identify and acknowledge what the problem/issue is, and (iii) the reasons that lie behind the problem/issue. It is important to understand actions and reactions, and the first step towards that process is assessing the reasons that lie behind the action, and the reasons that lie behind the reaction. So reasons assist assist understanding, they do not, or do not necessarily in and of themselves, amount to an excuse. So when someone sets out the reasons behind any act, one is not becoming an apologist for the act in question, unless and until that someone goes a step further, and states that the reasons is a valid excuse for the action"
[comment at source].


"It's not Islamophobia that has put the electricity of fear and tension into the atmosphere, but Islamic terrorism. So surely our response to the Finsbury Park attack should distinguish between action and reaction. Both may be reprehensible, but it takes a broken moral compass to suggest they are equally reprehensible. Or else it takes a conscience warped by what some call political correctness and what could more appropriately be called our civilisation's suicide wish"
[source].


"The 'authorities' usual consternation about motive is missing. If the incident seems 'Islamophobic' they announce the motive quickly. If the perpetrator is shouting 'Allahu Akbar' the motive is almost impossible to pinpoint, and even if identified is never described by any word with 'islam' or 'muslim' as a modifier"
[comment at source].


"We do not know all that much about the attacker, Darren Osborne, but within minutes of the incident the media, the politicians and the elites were utterly sure about his motivation: he was an evil Islamophobe. Yet when a Muslim with the name Muhammed waves an IS flag, shouts 'Alahu Akbar', and lops off the heads of infidels, all the experts [sic] assure us that we have no clear motive to go on"
[source].


"Finally, the terror deniers of the Left have a terrorist they are happy to condemn. In the aftermath of the attack there have been no idiotic efforts to downplay the terror threat by comparing the number of deaths in the West with those who die from bee stings or fall off ladders"
[quoted at source].


"Do you remember that after Manchester and London Bridge MSM, luvvies and politicians told us not to tar a whole community of peace-loving muslims with the brush of terrorism, and that we must all love each other - 'don't look back in anger'? Compare that with the instant outpouring of rage and incrimination after that 'terrorist attack' now downgraded to 'incident' on Monday night: tarring the whole 'white community' ... as Islamophobic racists is perfectly all right, muslim 'rage'; is totally acceptable"
[source].


"Let me remind all of you of one very basic and damning truth. It is a cold hard statistic that cannot be wished away or explained away: since ... 9/11/2001 ... there have been 31,046 deadly Islamic terror attacks. Did you get that? And yet the fools running the West ... are insisting that there is some sort of moral equivalence here: Islam has a few bad eggs, but so too does the evil right wing. Um no. Conservatives during the past 16 years have not gone on 31,046 deadly terror attacks. ... please offer me ten other examples of right wing terrorism resulting in numerous casualties this month. Indeed, just name two others. There is no moral equivalence here whatsoever"
[source].


"If [Mrs May] really will stop at nothing to defeat violence, she should start by stopping the Muslim action first, and the reaction to it second. This isn't just a temporal sequence, but a moral pecking order"
[source].


"[I]t seems likely that in the long run Mrs May et al will attach greater significance to this long anticipated 'Islamophobic backlash' than to mere humdrum terror attacks like Manchester, Westminster Bridge and London Bridge. If a fellow goes all Allahu Akbar ... well, he was a bit of a loner, had a few mental-health issues, difficult family background, etc. No wider significance or pattern can be discerned: ... all jihad is local. But, if some guy rides his van up on the sidewalk in Finsbury Park, that will doubtless be emblematic of an epidemic of right-wing hate, and Facebook, Google & Co need to do a better job of policing social media"
[source].


"The response to the Finsbury attack has been striking for its double standards. Observers and politicos have done all the things they warn us not to do after Islamist [sic] attacks. After Islamist [sic] terrorism they instruct us not to get angry, not to hold any community or culture responsible, and not to fall for the apparently foul, racist idea that the Koran or certain imams might have inspired this violence. In fact, they ringfence Islam from criticism and frown on efforts to discover the possible scriptural source of the terror. They wield the insult 'Islamophobe' against anyone who suggests there might be a broader cultural problem behind such violence. 'It's just an individual with warped ideas', they insist. This time, in response to a suspected act of far-right violence, they've changed their tune. They've ditched their usual pacifying cry of 'Keep calm and carry on', in favour of inviting the nation to look in the mirror. This act of violence does have a communal base, they claim. It speaks to an 'increase in Islamophobia all over the country' ... This violence does have an intellectual origin we should all worry about: it is the tabloid media's 'addiction to Islamophobia' that nurtured it, we're told. This violence does raise questions about certain communities in Britain, especially tabloid-reading ones ... 'the vulnerable', easily whipped into 'crazed hysteria'"
[source].


"Suddenly, it is okay to see an act of individual violence as a signifier of social and communal problems. It is bad, apparently, to raise any questions about Muslim communities after Islamist [sic] attacks. But after Finsbury it is absolutely fine, important in fact, to query the rank, media-fuelled prejudices that apparently lurk in certain communities 'all over the country'. ... 'We must never criticise the Muslim community, because we might hurt their feelings, but we should definitely criticise the tabloid-addicted, 'vulnerable' sections of society that refuse to respect religious difference'. ... This approach both infantilises the Muslim community, treating them as incapable of robust discussion, and criminalises the white working class, who are presumed to be one newspaper editorial away from 'crazed hysteria'"
[source].


"Action and reaction indeed, the physics of politics. Now we have the beginnings of an answer to a question ... politicians don't seem to ask: 'Do you think people are just going to keep taking this?'  Politics is about the management of violence: who gets to use violence on whom, when, and why. In the UK and other European countries, the invaders get to come to your land and kill and molest and impoverish you, [clog] your streets with strange tongues and customs, and trash your heritage. The legacy population is not allowed to protest. They must endure silently or mouth cant about diversity and acquiesce. And the politicians can't claim the populaces they represent - or used to before the demographics changed - agreed with this. Voting did no good for these beleaguered. It will do less good as immigration increases. The violence was not only managed in Britain. A de facto monopoly was given for one side to cook up more, its numbers ever strengthened by immigration, its propaganda never challenged. It is even subsidized. If violence is the last, horrible, uncertain resort for the natives, those not only native by birth but also confident adherents to the Western rite of reason, secularism, free speech, and the rule of law, I won't, as a citizen of a country created and preserved by two violent wars, condemn it"
[comment at source].


"The MCB [Muslim Council of Britain] won't accept that Islam bears responsibility for terrorism unless we Islamophobes also accept that Douglas Murray is responsible for the Finsbury Mosque van-ramming. If the MCB thinks it can deflect the notion that Islam bears responsibility for terrorism by arguing that Douglas Murray must accept responsibility for Finsbury Park, that is wrong. There are many flaws in this imaginary comparison. Apart from the huge difference in scale and 'pattern', and the differing elements of direct incitement to violence - (some in the case of hate preachers and none in the case of Douglas Murray) the most fundamental difference is that Islam is the catalyst and 'the other side' is the response. The equivalence theory is not going to work. There is no equivalence and no contradictory principle there"
[source].


"Islamophobia:  a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons"
[Christopher Hitchens].


"Islamophobia should really be defined as the cowardly and irrational compulsion to appease Islam, for fear of the likelihood of its adherents rioting and murdering should it be required to abide by the same laws as all other beliefs, and to encourage cultural, legislative and judicial self mutilation rather than to risk offending a belief system that holds us in utter contempt. An example of this bizarre and repulsive mental condition would be not just allowing but applauding a march in London, replete with emblems of various banned terrorist organisations, calling for the destruction of Israel (as opposed to calling for equal civil rights for Palestinians, which could have been achieved decades ago if the goal of the Palestinian 'liberationists' had been justice rather than genocide), and within one day calling for the arrest of Tommy Robinson who has never advocated violence, simply for refusing to pretend that there isn't a problem"
[comment at source].


"I don't think I'm an extremist. I've never been on a demonstration, I've always paid my taxes, I've never been arrested. I've never been to a football match, I don't support any team. Boringly conventional I've even spent half my working life as a civil servant. I don't bear ill will to any nation or people, if 'they' want to live like 'that', well good luck to them.  I'm not blind either. I don't see Islam being good to any peoples anywhere. The more I study of its doctrines the more convinced I am that it is bad. I can understand why people in Pakistan follow it because to not do so is to die. I don't understand why any sane government would want to import it and having done so to protect it. But then I thought men were men and women were women and their different bits fitted and that made babies and babies were better off with mums and dads. And I thought that I should accept some responsibility for my weaker neighbour but now I find that it is his right to demand my help, even if he never was my neighbour until yesterday. So just by standing firm on my society's foundations I am now an extremist as the new 'moderates' rush toward me with their staves and sickles"
[comment at source].

 

Government Failure to Protect Its People --> Vigilantism


"But what if the eternally unprovokable finally decide to get provoked?"
[source].


"This will only become more frequent until the Media/Government start dealing with Islam and speaking honestly about it"
[comment at source].


"It's axiomatic that, if the state won't protect the people, the people will protect themselves"
[source].


"The laws of political correctness superseding all other laws, the state has done nothing to solve the problem of Muslim terrorism or even to acknowledge that this is what it is. Both main parties are implicated in this. ... Pressure has been building up in the cooker for a long time, and everyone knew the top would be blown before long"
[source].


"I am not really surprised that we now see some insanity from our side with worshipers being mown down at their Mosque. When your country or government does little to nothing to defend its ... subjects, people when pushed hard enough will start resorting to vigilantism when they feel helpless to stop what is happening! There are fringes on both sides, but now our fringe is beginning to push back, and although I don't like it, I can certainly understand it"
[comment at source].


"[W]hat he did was utterly dreadful and attempting murder is not the answer, ever. However ... my heart goes out to this man ... the father of four children, watching what happened to other children in Manchester - not just that, watching life getting increasingly more dangerous for his children. He must have felt that nothing was being done to protect them - we can only guess at what was going on in his obviously tormented imagination, but I am sure he isn't alone in worrying about his young family"
[comment at source].


"The 'Bubba Effect':  When the government cannot or will not protect the citizens, some people stand up and protect themselves or go on the offensive. They carry out what they see as justice, on their own because the State has repeatedly failed to do so ... hence, a White English guy just drove into a bunch of muslims, because, well, a bunch of muslims have been killing White Englishmen for years now. Never mind that the folks he killed and injured probably have not and would not have been involved in terrorist activities. The point is, he's sick of it and is fighting back for what he sees as an attack on his culture, his way of live, his family, his church, etc, etc."
[comment at source].


"The British government ... are ... due some introspection. They actively brought in thousands upon thousands of people from a far away land, many of whom have nothing in common with regular Britons, and have no desire to assimilate, and actually hate everything about Westerners and our way of life. ... [then] when those from the far away land [who] are more inclined to violence, do decide to self-detonate or make their car a human battering ram, instead of a hard line, we are told the usual sissified, PC platitudes that only make those from this land are inclined to be 'Bubba', more furious and prone to violent action themselves"
[comment at source].


"[The Bubba Effect] was played out in full in the case of Ken Rex McElroy, the 'town bully' of Skidmore, MO.  McElroy spent [years] stealing, raping, burning, and terrorizing the people of his small country town. Attempts to get the law to take action were futile: the police and judges were intimidated by this outlaw, and people who tried to stand up to him would find themselves alone and targeted for reprisals, as their neighbours ran for cover and the law looked the other way. Finally the guy was gunned down on the main street by a posse of townsmen who'd had enough. After he was executed, everyone just walked away, and no one to this day has ever broken the silence over who did the shooting, even though it was witnessed by over a dozen people. The authorities will find soon enough that having armed enforcers on their side isn't enough if they don't have the support of the people. The difficulty of trying to investigate Muslim communities will be duplicated in the native population, as people close ranks and refuse to assist investigations of their own"
[comment at source].


"There is clearly a large swath of Western society that does not wish to commit suicide by multiculturalism and when you essentially outlaw freedom of thought and speech, and criminalise dissenting thought, this is unfortunately but ultimately a very predictable consequence"
[comment at source].


"When the people see those they have entrusted to protect them actively excusing and indirectly abetting those who attack them, why would it be surprising at all to see the people begin to take matters into their own hands. Playing by the rules only applies when the rules apply to everyone ... Perhaps if the governments involved treated the guilty as the threats to society that they are, and that includes those who assist the guilty both physically and ideologically, then the innocent wouldn't have to suffer the backlash that will inevitably come"
[comment at source].


"Muslims run down pedestrians in an attack aimed at white, Christian westerners and we are expected to just hold our cranks and take it because [of] multiculturalism. Muslims lop the heads off of white western soldiers in broad daylight in the middle of London and we are expected to deal [with it] because vibrant diversity is our strength. Muslims gun down people in the Canadian Parliament building and, oh well, we need to get used to it. The governments of Europe turn a blind eye to blatant terrorist acts on the native-born, ostensibly free born people. The civil police forces cannot be bothered to crack down on the grooming gangs of English daughters for fear of being called 'racist'. The 'no-go zones' of European cities, where police, unveiled women, and angels, fear to tread, are accepted by the authorities as a way of life in the multicultural reality. Ye the governments of these ostensibly free and liberty-minded societies are shocked, SHOCKED, when the people start rising up in retaliation against the enemy Mohammadans in their midst"
[comment at source].


"Darren Osborne ... wasn't in any immediate danger - he wasn't pre-empting or warding off an attack. However, he was justified in feeling threatened as a member of the group routinely and indiscriminately targeted by Muslim terrorists - just as Jews were targeted in Russia circa 1903. That feeling he had, however justified it might have been, doesn't excuse his criminal action. But it certainly mitigates it"
[source].


"[M]ost folks are getting sick and tired of [the hypocrisy]. If we took the threat of Islamic terror seriously, we might spare the lives of many innocent men, women and children. But as long as our elites play this sick game of defending Islam at all costs, the toll will rise, there will be more bloodshed on our streets, and likely - and regrettably - there will be more revenge attacks carried out by those who have lost all faith in their governments to protect them"
[source].


"[Tommy Robinson] says the politicians are failing us by not tackling the real problem and that this has led to what happened last night as people decide to take things into their own hands. What Robinson is not saying is that we should do that... he is in fact urging the government to take action to prevent such 'radicalisation' of non-Muslims who see themselves and their society under attack almost daily"
[source].


"[U]nless HMG does something about [Islamic terrorism against Her Majesty's subjects], people like Darren Osborne ... will. If they start doing it en masse, that could spell disintegration of public order, with vigilante justice replacing the rule of law"
[source].


"There is a simple question to be asked of our 'leaders': 'What are are you trying to achieve? (What is the goal?).'  They have imported an American Pit Bull Terrier and let it breed. Some of these dogs have attacked other dogs. They tell us that not all APBTs bite (which is true). Their 'answer' appears to be to import and breed more APBTs. Eventually everyone will have an APBT so there won't be any Yorkshire terriers being attacked so that will be 'alright'. Sadly the same approach is being adopted with gusto across the entire West. Eventually there will be no homes for any Yorkshire terriers in the world, which is exactly what the 'APBTs breed society handbook' has called for for the last 1400 years"
[comment at source].


"The liblabcon government has allowed the return of 500 hardened ISIS volunteers who together with their families and clan members ... and recruits and sleepers give access to upwards of 5,000 jihadis. They are free to live off welfare and to go where they want and plan what they want notwithstanding GCHQ monitors some of them. That is the equivalent of the wartime coalition government of Churchill allowing two regiments of Waffen SS to infiltrate the big towns of the North of England and to go to ground to fight a guerrilla war. This is High Treason. It cannot be made clearer that the government has no plan but appeasement and the punishing of people like Tommy Robinson who has the charisma and the [courage] to speak the truth"
[comment at source].


"Never in history has European man been more compliant to the wishes of his overseers, or even his peers. Life expectancy has increased, but is life being truly lived? ... Despondency sets in. Some join the ranks of the silent epidemic of White middle aged males taking their own lives. Mass immigration, Islamic terror, and the rape of White children occurs amidst this bewildering, infuriating inertia. All of this occurred to me as I watched phone-recorded images of Darren Osborne prior to being bundled into the back of a police van. In one clip he shouts 'Kill Me' to the Muslims surrounding him. Semi-drunk, he appears possessed of both physical and mental pain. I believe that Osborne's actions were indeed an act of revenge, but they were perhaps foremost an act of rebellion - a rebellion against the idea that revenge couldn't even be contemplated; a rebellion against inertia and the silent suffering of inaction"
[source].


"It was 'the authorities' that disarmed the citizenry [sic] in the 1950s and 1960s. Before that it was recognised that self defence was not only an unalienable right, but a basic human instinct. The assumption was that the free citizen [sic] should be able to protect himself or his property by any means at his disposal - including firearms. Also it was a principle that the 'keepers of the Queen's peace' were the citizens themselves - the police merely being citizens in uniform who were paid to devote themselves to it full time. In disarming the citizenry, government assumed responsibility for the safety and security of the individual citizen. It has not only failed in that duty ... but the loss of life and limb has been a direct result of government policies"
[comment at source].


"Sadly, General Gordon's deep misgivings during his last posting to Khartoum (1884-1885) have proven to be only too well-founded. like the British in 1885, Western powers still fail to understand [the] indomitable spirit of the world's mujahidin"
[comment at source].

 

Dhimmis, Appeasers, Quislings, Virtue-Signallers


"Finally, the terror deniers of the Left have a terrorist they are happy to condemn"
[quoted at source].


"The very people who implored us to carry on as before and not be alarmed after an Islamist [sic] blew up little girls leaving a pop concert in Manchester seem to think it is perfectly reasonable to be hysterical about a lone attack aimed at Muslims"
[quoted at source].


"[T]he usual calls for love, tolerance and togetherness have been replaced by opportunistic fearmongering from the very people who steadfastly refuse to accept the reality of Islamist [sic] terror around the world. Instead of prayers, hashtags and demands for unity, the Left has gone on the attack by blaming its ideological opponents for inspiring the attack. Terror is terror and should be condemned categorically, not just when it is convenient to your ideological narrative"
[quoted at source].


"The simple truth is, most Western leaders and commentators are fully in bed with Islam and will never say anything negative about it - despite the daily, even hourly, body count which keeps on rising and rising. They will only really get hyped up about terrorism when it comes form a non-Muslim it seems"
[source].


"The real blame lies with the treasonous quislings who have sold us out for a few bags of silver. Sure Blair got 50 to 100 million for it, nits it's surprising how cheaply the rest were bought. Our politicians have dug this hole for us and now they don't have the guts to fix it or even admit it"
[comment at source].


"The British government and the rest of the elites go from 'what could possibly go wrong' to 'how could we have possibly known' in a nanosecond, but not with any sense of shame or responsibility. You can't shame the shameless. There will be no introspection ... they will double down on the multiculti"
[comment at source].


"How long do these apologists think the steady stream of Muslim terrorism can go on before the backlash occurs, and do they really think that yelling 'Islamophobia' is going to stop the backlash once it has started?"
[comment at source].


"[T]he complete intractability of the liberal mindset, ie. Yes, we must accept the cultural differenced, yes, we ARE supposed to lie down and take it just because, and yes, this will never happen to anyone I care about, therefore I see no reason for anger or revenge, you conservative beastly person. ... At this point I firmly think that there is a physical chasm in the liberal/conservative genetic makeup that can never be bridged by discourse or body count. We are doomed to spin in our alternate realities, overlapping occasionally like a Venn diagram. How disheartening"
[comment at source].


"[T]he double standards also point to a deeper problem: the commonalities between the extremist Islamist outlook and what passes for 'liberal' commentary today ... Reading some of the commentary on the Finsbury attack, about the 'poisonous narrative' spreading through Britain and creating 'hateful bigots' all over the country, it is hard to tell where mainstream thinking ends and Islamist [sic] intolerance begins. Because that outlook, that idea that vast numbers of Brits despise Muslims and are on the cusp of bigoted hysteria, is precisely the underpinning of the extreme victim narrative of modern Islamist [sic] violence"
[source].


"The frothing at the mouth of the liberal cognoscenti has been excruciating to follow. That idiot of idiots Owen Jones described Finsbury park as an atrocity. Will he be censured, lose his job at the Grauniad or his fat ABBC pay packet? ... Will Cressida Dick be censured? ... We are led by idiots and I really don't know how it has happened"
[comment at source].


"[T]he figure of the 'right wing extremist' is largely mythical. Not only is this true in terms of the vulgar exaggeration of the threat of violence from the Right, but also because 'extremism' is itself merely an invention of the late 20th-century Liberal state, which hubristically lays claim to define what is normal and natural. The Liberal state sees itself as devoid of ideology, and the ultimate in benevolent neutrality. Just as the Liberal state is founded on this lie, so the concept of 'extremism' is a lie. There isn't even anything 'extreme' about Islamism - it simply is, and is true to its own primitive nature. It would be more honest for us to simply call Islamists 'Muslims' than to call them 'extremists'"
[source].


"In truth, so called 'right wing extremists' comprised just 8% of terror arrests last year, and were almost non-existent at the charging and conviction stages - suggesting that the legal system is deliberately targeting innocent Whites for arrest on very weak suspicions in an effort to massage its figures and make Muslims look slightly better"
[source].


"I could probably argue that the Liberal 'state' is itself 'extremist' because it locks people in jail for years for leaving sandwiches outside mosques, but that would be playing their game ... the only oddity about it all is that Liberalism has forgotten that it rests on 'the shoulders of giants' who jailed, were jailed, killed, or were killed in order to pave its way into government and statehood. Without 'extremists' Liberalism wouldn't exist today"
[source].


"Liberalism is facilitating multiculturalism. Multiculturalism is facilitating the demographic decline of our people. We cannot long endure the status quo. As things worsen, we will very probably see more examples of the frustration of the everyman boiling over. However, Liberalism cannot accept that it is pushing ordinary people to the edge. Thus, Osborne the frustrated everyman is being reconstructed as Osborne the right-wing terrorist. It's a narrative resting on very poor foundations, but the status quo is milking the incident in Finsbury Park for every drop of ideological value. Owen Jones, a repugnant homosexual journalist at The Guardian has written: ... Jones, like many pathological liars on the Left, is being disingenuous to say the least ... Jones may truly believe the lies he tells, though he has a history of bending narratives in accordance with his own ideological preferences"
[source].


"The real, deeper, reason why Osborne has been charged with a political offence is because his actions were a political affront to the multicultural agenda and the Left-Liberal, globalist state, and must necessarily be reconstructed as systematically 'racist', 'neo-Nazi' or 'far right'. As time progresses and things worsen, we should expect more and more relatively ordinary, unaffiliated, and frustrated people to act against this system, and to undergo similar reconstructions"
[source].


"I have no doubt that Osborne will be convicted of terrorism as a diversionary tactic. Interesting that the rent-a-mobs are out with other anti-White protest about the Muslim filled Grenfell Tower fire. Bad press for Muslims - London Bridge and Manchester - are out of the news and good press is in!"
[comment at source].

 

Fifth Columnists and Trojan Horses


"Does Sadiq Khan think terrorism is 'part and parcel' of living in London now?"
[quoted at source].


"For some reason the Muslim Mayor of London Sadiq Khan did not repeat his claim that terrorism is part and parcel of living in a big city. Indeed, while he is often silent on all the terror attacks in his city and nation, he was very quick to stand in front of the media to condemn the attack and offer more police protection for mosques"
[source].


"The MCB [Muslim Council of Britain] won't accept that Islam bears responsibility for terrorism unless we Islamophobes also accept that Douglas Murray is responsible for the Finsbury Mosque van-ramming. If the MCB thinks it can deflect the notion that Islam bears responsibility for terrorism by arguing that Douglas Murray must accept responsibility for Finsbury Park, that is wrong. There are many flaws in this imaginary comparison. Apart from the huge difference in scale and 'pattern', and the differing elements of direct incitement to violence - (some in the case of hate preachers and none in the case of Douglas Murray) the most fundamental difference is that Islam is the catalyst and 'the other side' is the response. The equivalence theory is not going to work. There is no equivalence and no contradictory principle there"
[source].


"Maybe the MCB should be confronted with a few questions.... (1) Does Douglas Murray use a book of socio-political rules in a religious binding to back up his very well researched arguments?  (2) Have there been any Channel 4 documentaries made about how Douglas Murray tried to undermine the political system in London by installing shills into the Labour Party, and furthering a political agenda using religion as a base for nepotism? (Britain's Islamic Republic (2010))  (3) Has Douglas Murray, using his belief system and adherents thereof, published an 'online magazine' downloaded by 55,000 people in the UK which calls for the destruction of the secularist west?  (4) Is Murray trying to start a state that is entirely based on the teachings of the literature of one religion?  (5) Has Douglas Murray ever issued a death threat, even a slightly camp one?  (6) In his broad lexicon, does Murray have equivalent words for 'taqiya, jizya or kaffir', words that would sum up their Arabic and Koranic semantics quite as well?"
[comment at source].

 

'Moderate' Muslims


"The attacker is solely top blame - he chose to do this, nobody made him do it - he alone is guilty of this crime. But I think the 'moderate' or 'peaceful' muslims ('please stand up, please stand up, please stand up') need to look in the mirror and realise that they have a responsibility to ferret out muslim supremacists within their ranks. Problem is, too many of them who may not be violent themselves, are okay with other muslims using violence against infidels. Also, they've had many opportunities to stand up and say something, or do something, and very, very few of them rarely do"
[comment at source].

 

The Mainstream Media and the Press


"If you have not heard anything about the Brussels and Paris attacks there is good reason for this. The leftist MSM is utterly focused on ... Finsbury Park ... it is the despicable hypocrisy and double standards here that stink to high heaven. The T and H words were immediately released (terrorism and hate); global condemnation was instantaneous; and incredibly, not one excuse was made by the MSM for this particular attack"
[source].


"The irony is that the BBC has long warned of the rise of the Far Right and they get applauded... [Tommy] Robinson does it and he gets attacked and told he should be locked up.... the difference of course between him and the BBC is that Robinson tells you why the Far Right is able to get an audience and attract supporters... it lies in the policies of the government and its failure to genuinely tackle the rise of radical, conservative Islam... in fact doing all it can it would seem to encourage it and prevent criticism of it as the dangerously failing experiment of mass Muslim immigration into Europe continues apace. The BBC naturally does not tell you that awkward truth merely suggesting that the Far-Right are simply racists who have no rational reason to rise up against what they see as a threat... and of course there is no thereat... it's racist scaremongering by the Mail apparently"
[source].


"Today has made me really angry about how the bBC promotes this leftwing idea that Islam can only be a religion of peace ... We had an incident where somebody allegedly drove into a load of people. The bBC which always affixes 'allegedly' to any terrorist attack carried out by Muslims hasn't done so in this case. 1 Person died and it seems he didn't die due to being hit by a van, but rather he died due to medical reasons, which is why he collapsed into the road just before the van came along and where so many people had rushed into the road in which to help him"
[comment at source].


"Last month 25 year old Akikul Islam was found guilty in London of driving into a crowd of Muslims (who just happened to be celebrating Eid with baseball bats, knives, bottles, fists and feet). He put a load into hospital some seriously. Where was the bBC outrage? Last night a man armed with an axe and a knife was arrested outside a TA (reserves centre) in Kidderminster. On friday a muslim looking fellow was tazered outside parliament whilst carrying a knife. In Paris a man drove into a police car and died. Inside the car was found an nAK47, explosives. Last week a Pakistani boy had his throat slit in London. In fact this past month has seen an average of 1 person (usually non-white) stabbed to death or shot in London every other day. Yet for all of the above only one is deemed a hateful terror attack"
[comment at source].


"[T]he BBC can best be understood as having a number of linked agendas and bias is just a product of those agendas. Having an agenda is more than just a bias - they seek to indoctrinate, persuade and suppress. Just take a look at the CBBC channel - which is aimed for 6 to 12 year olds - an age where children in general lack critical faculties. On the CBBC channel they describe the Finsbury Mosque attack as a case of Islamophobia and they they have a very detailed explanation for Islamophobia: ... But it is much more than this... it leaks into the actual television programmes for children too"
[comment at source].


"It doesn't seem to occur to all those who have abandoned their professional duty to report objectively that what they are doing is worse than appeasement. They are promoting the submission of us, the 'white British', to Islam. Criticising that 'religion', never mind being angry about their terrorist attacks, and above all never mind being angry about their child grooming gangs and rape gangs over decades: that must be prohibited in the the name of 'peace and love'. Edmund Burke said: 'All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing'. Prohibiting us ordinary people from speaking out against evil allows that evil to flourish and triumph"
[source].


"As for The Guardian, it is the voice of a small minority and its content has reached self-parody as a sort of BAME/LGBT/Marxist broadsheet, but it is unfortunately quite influential, especially in the BBC, among Labour/Liberal Democrats, and the Red Bohemia of the 'music' & 'arts' scene. It has been the main public 'intellectual' tool of the New Left 'race-gender-class' agenda-networking, which has incrementally subverted our institutions, from education curricula to parliamentary legislation, and is now poised for 'insurrection' (John McDonnell MP) as a final push on the 'class' front - targeted vilification of opponents, grievance demos, student safe-spaces & sit-downs, wildcat strikes, race riots, direct action, social media manipulation, paralysis of government, etc"
[comment at source].

 

Piers Morgan 'Interviews' Tommy Robinson

The one in which Piers Morgan shows himself to be a fool and a disgrace, devoid of all truth and knowledge; Tommy Robinson shows himself to be standing on the righteous and factual high ground; and the air-head in red shows herself to be, well, the air-head in red...

YOUTUBE:  Muslim Terrorism: Piers Morgan vs. Tommy Robinson:  Part One  |  Part Two  |  Part Three  |  Part Four  (20 June 2017)

"Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him" (Proverbs 26:4)   /   "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!" (Isaiah 5:20-21)   /   "He that saith unto the wicked, Thou art righteous; him shall the people curse ... But to them that rebuke him shall be delight, and a good blessing shall come upon them" (Proverbs 24:24-25)


"I ... timed the so-called 'interview' and the total amount of time that Tommy Robinson was allowed to speak without being interrupted or talked over was 5m 22s or in other words 23% of the entire interview time ... that wasn't a fair interview, just a finger-wagging diatribe. No not diatribe... RANT, by Piers Morgan"
[comment at source].


"All the left have in their locker is screaming those buzzwords, they have no common sense argument against us. Piers Morgan, what a disgrace, Tommy came armed with the Koran and they freaked out they had no answers and everybody saw that"
[comment at source].


"Piers' reaction, once his ignorance of Islam had been so graphically exposed, was to attempt to drown out the arguments he could not answer by hurling a barrage of prejudiced, intolerant, totally inaccurate and underserved insults at Tommy. Piers is by no means always wrong. But, on this occasion he was pitifully wrong. Fortunately, as we saw, Tommy is an experienced old hand at dealing with this sort of bigotry"
[comment at source].


"As soon as Tommy mentioned Sir William Gladstone, it was all over for Piers, and that's precisely why he flew into hysterics. Obviously you can't call beloved figures like Gladstone and Churchill Islamophobic bigots, so Piers has no choice but to regress into ad homs ('bigoted lunatic') and furious denouncement in order to avoid conceding the larger point. Not only could Piers not refute Tommy's point, he couldn't even acknowledge it. He lost his moral high ground and silencing tactic in one fell swoop. At that precise moment, in front of the whole country, he looked like the unpatriotic Tokyo Rose turncoat that he is. He couldn't let that stand"
[comment at source].


"It's become apparent that this current crop of politicians and pundits are trying to forcibly separate Brits from their forefathers and ancestors. Deliberately burying and drowning out the timeless wisdom and warnings they imparted before entrusting us with their legacy. The pro-Islamic propaganda the left pushes is the 180 degree opposite of what the country stands for and they b***** well know it. Echoes of the past are like crosses to these EU vampires because they serve as a painful reminder of a long-abandoned duty to the British way of life and representative government. Piers and his comrades are as guilty as sin and the thing they fear most is you REALIZING it. Tommy left them exposed beyond a reasonable doubt, and their only remaining course of action became distraction, panic and rage"
[comment at source].


"I believe that British people are truly demoralized and frightened and Piers simply shows that they are in denial. The UK is occupied by a fifth column, there is no doubt about it. If Tommy Robinson didn't have a 'lower class' accent, he'd be in parliament! A prophet its without honor in his own land... He speaks truth with passion"
[comment at source].


"I believe that the school already teach their kids that Gladstone and Churchill were 'racist thugs'. There is no controversy in today's UK about that. Also, I don't remember anyone in the government protesting when Hussein Obama removed the bust from the Oval Office. I think quoting Churchill (or even Ataturk) is considered blasphemy, Islamophobia, racism and hate speech. To quote the Koran with the intent [of] 'exposing' its hate speech is also hate speech"
[comment at source].


"[Tommy] was completely set up there, but it didn't work out quite as they'd planned :)"  /  "They really thought they had him didn't they. The pre-production meeting must have been something to behold as they high-fived past the croissants armed with their bit of footage from 2011 and media diplomas in 'berating and obfuscation'. Reid proving herself to be a cretin on no less than three occasions. Morgan interviewing himself. Again"
[comments at source].


"This takes Craig's interruption quotient up to a whole new level. I don't think Tommy was allowed to complete a single sentence before being shouted down - or shrieked at by the apparently ill-informed duo. Remember, it's all about the questions - in Piers Morgan's world answers are not important. Who needs a guest anyway?"
[comment at source].


"When someone calls you names and tries to silence you, they've lost"
[comment at source].


"Tommy Robinson has his faults but is generally on the side of the angels. The fact he gives his opinions in blunt working class fashion, does not make them less valid. His persecution by the state has been outrageous"
[comment at source].


"Which part of Sharia law does Morgan like? I wish he'd tell us since he's not an Islamophobe"
[comment at source].


"Oh look!  ITV have blocked the video on copyright grounds. Not because they had two presenters that made utter turkeys of themselves for 10 minutes then? To be honest, if I was ITV I'd have blocked it too. Robinson waving the Koran about could be enough to start conflict, which proves his point to an extent. The broadcasters just can't seem to complete the circle of logical thought that would lead them to start asking why they are so terrified"
[comment at source].


"Morgan is just a talking head. All of the MSM is these days. After Rushdie, Theo van Gogh, the Danish cartoons, Charlie Hebdo, etc etc... the MSM bosses have probably had private meetings where they have decided to defend Islam in order to protect their employees. The BBC and ITV, for example, have thousands of workers turning up every day, from cleaners to 'journalists' to CEOs. If a SINGLE WORD is out of place then they are ALL under threat. The majority of these workers probably don't even know about these issues. They are too busy trying to earn a living and survive. ... The MSM lives in fear due to the threat of death to innocent people. ... It's a real shame that so many people get their news from the MSM. The MSM is cucked, but I can understand why ... Criticising Islam equates to a possible death sentence"
[comment at source].


"[F]ear ... for the welfare of employees serving to gag media organisations ... is a problem that needs serious consideration, but is generally avoided due to its obvious difficulties. In the bleakest terms though the readiness of Islam's adherents to resort to violence over any challenge to their attempts at supremacy can be either confronted or submitted to. This should be responded to with open public criticism and defiance. Yes this is dangerous. The fact is that many of us are going to get killed and injured. It is also the case that responding in kind is not helpful. But there is no choice, refusing to recognise and confront this problem only allows it to grow and the danger to increase"
[comment at source].

 

UK's Mosques


"[N]o efforts were made to integrate the Muslims into British society. On the contrary, Islamic particularism was encouraged in the name of diversity"
[source].


"[Nothing] has been done to make sure that none of Britain's 1,600 (!) mosques would be used as recruitment grounds for mass murderers. Specifically, from 1997 until 2003 Finsbury Park Mosque ... provided a platform for Abu Hamza to preach Islamic hatred for our hospitable country. And this was far from the only mosque used for that purpose"
[source].


"Those impassioned youngsters, many of whom can't even speak proper English despite being born in Britain, are easy clay to mould. They go out and kill in the name of Allah, with people in Britain becoming increasingly desperate and insecure"
[source].


"'...on random Muslims in the street'  Of course Finsbury Park mosque area is notorious and has been on the news over many years. Just for accuracy"
[comment at source].

 

The 1400 Year War

"[L]et's begin by admitting that we're at war - not with alienated [loners] on cannabis, not with Islamists, not with Islamofascists, not with Islamic fundamentalists, but with Islam. This was has been going on for 1,400 years, and it has had lulls alternating with flare-ups. We're going through a flare-up now" [source].

 

Secularism and Bigotry

Bigot:  "a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices"

Bigotry:  "obstinate or intolerant devotion to one's own opinions and prejudices"  / "stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own"

"[The] stumbling block is the new secularism that says, very clearly, that we are to be treated equally and to do otherwise is contrary to the separation of state and religion. This, of course, is not what secularism originally meant. True secularism never claimed that all beliefs (or behaviours) were equal but it did state that all beliefs were to be heard and considered and then the people were entitled to make a decision based on the facts. The new secularism jams that mechanism and says that we are not even entitled to discuss the matter. This is based on the claim of 'bigotry', but to anyone who knows what bigotry actually means, it is the idea that people refuse to be convinced irrespective of the evidence. The idea that people should be shut down from speaking and putting forward a point of view because their ideas are 'bigoted' is absurd. It goes completely against any logical concept of what bigotry actually is. Until we address this fundamental problem with how people perceive what secularism is then the way forward is blocked. Secularism needs to be returned to what it originally meant" [comment at source].

 

When Truth Disappears

The following is an extended extract from the article: Terrorism: When Truth Disappears

"You know the drill by now: every idiotic excuse in the book is made for Muslim terrorists. It has become such a standard and routine response of Western leaders, commentators and 'experts' that we do not need to wait for any new information.

"The formula runs like this: A Muslim kills in the name of his faith, or political ideology, making it 100% clear what his motivation is, what his religion is, and what his beef is, and the West offers us this:

  • he was mentally ill;
  • he was a lone wolf;
  • he must have had some real serious grievances to act like this;
  • we cannot tar all of Islam with this one attack;
  • we must remind people that Christians are terrorists too;
  • we must insist that you have more chances of getting killed by a wayward emu than a Muslim terrorist;
  • we must repeat the mantra that Islam is a religion of peace;
  • we must come to accept all this as the new normal;
  • we must accept that this is the way life now is in the West;
  • we must insist that the real worry is any backlash against Muslims;
  • we must do more to protect Muslims;
  • we must resist all this racism;
  • we must assure all Muslims that we fully stand with them no matter what;
  • we must stop alienating and offending Muslims;
  • we must above all guard against Islamophobia;
  • we must remember the appropriate response: more hashtags, candle-lit vigils, 'peace' marches and love-ins;
  • we will need more pop concerts with young pop stars gyrating in front of smitten 13-year-old girls;
  • we will hire yet more Muslim policemen, firemen, politicians, military leaders, lecturers, and news readers in the West to combat all this ugly Islamophobia;
  • we will immediately attack and condemn anyone who dares to say we might have a problem with the political ideology of Islam.

"Now just change a few words and see how all this goes down with the Finsbury Park attacker:

  • he was mentally ill;
  • he was a lone wolf;
  • he must have had some real serious grievances to act like this;
  • we cannot tar all of conservatism with this one attack;
  • we must remind people that Muslims are terrorists too;
  • we must insist that you have more chances of getting killed by a wayward emu than a right wing terrorist...

"Exact same response, but to a different attacker. Now unless I have missed something here, I have never once heard any of these excuses and justifications for the non-Muslim attacker. Not one. Never. Why is that? Why do we have a broken record when it come to clear-cut cases of Islamic terrorism and jihad, but the whole world goes nuts when one non-Muslim does something similar?"

[End of Extract]

 

The Curse of Cain

"After Cain killed his brother, the Lord told him, ... 'Cursed shall you be from the earth', ... and so it has been. The earth under their feet may be cursed, it yields nothing but sand and thistles, ... They become worshippers of death dreaming of the green verdant fields of paradise which they can reach only if they kill enough men, women and children. Leaving devastation behind them, dead lands, lost cultures, widows and orphans, they claw their way up to heaven on a ladder of bones. Everything around them dies until the only green is on their flags. They are cursed from the earth and they curse the earth. Where they go, the world dies. ... Cain sows fields of corpses of the innocent for the Lord and he still does not understand why his sacrifice is not accepted and why the earth he dwells on is cursed. ...  From Iraq to Iran, from Kuwait to Saudi Arabia, from Nigeria to Somalia, from Pakistan to Indonesia, he holds up human heads and cries 'Allahu Akbar'. ... There is no room for Cain anywhere. Where he remains there will be death and suffering. He will kill because it is all he can do. He has nothing else to offer the world, his own kind, or the Creator.. ... He kills from one end of the world to the next and it is never his fault. Each time, each Abel did it. ... His code is cruelty and his holy book is written in blood on the flayed skins of his murdered victims. ... The cries of peoples long vanished from the earth warn us that we will either drive out Cain or his curse will fill our lands with blood and dust and all that we love and all that we have worked for will die at his cursed touch" [source].

 

The Burden Which Habakkuk the Prophet Saw

The righteous cry out for God's punishment of the injustice in their lands:
O LORD, how long shall I cry, and thou wilt not hear! even cry out unto thee of violence, and thou wilt not save!
Why dost thou show me iniquity, and cause me to behold grievance? for spoiling and violence are before me: and there are that raise up strife and contention.
Therefore the law is slacked, and judgment doth never go forth: for the wicked doth compass about the righteous; therefore wrong judgment proceedeth.

The LORD God answers:
Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you.
For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwelling places that are not theirs.
They are terrible and dreadful: their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves.
Their horses also are swifter than the leopards, and are more fierce than the evening wolves:
And their horsemen shall spread themselves, and their horsemen shall come from far; they shall fly as the eagle that hasteth to eat.
They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.
And they shall scoff at the kings, and the princes shall be a scorn unto them: they shall deride every strong hold; for they shall heap dust, and take it.
Then shall his mind change, and he shall pass over, and offend, imputing this his power unto his god.

The dismay of the righteous at God's answer:   
Art thou not from everlasting, O LORD my God, mine Holy One? we shall not die.
O LORD, thou hast ordained them for judgment; and, O mighty God, thou hast established them for correction.
Thou art of purer eyes than to behold evil, and canst not look on iniquity:
Wherefore lookest thou upon them that deal treacherously, and holdest thy tongue when the wicked devoureth the man that is more righteous than he?
They take up all of them with the angle, they catch them in their net, and gather them in their drag: therefore they rejoice and are glad.
Therefore they sacrifice unto their net, and burn incense unto their drag; because by them their portion is fat, and their meat plenteous.
Shall they therefore empty their net, and not spare continually to slay the nations?
I will stand upon my watch, and set me upon the tower, and will watch to see what he will say unto me, and what I shall answer when I am reproved.

The LORD God's reassurance to the righteous:
And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.
For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry.
Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith.

[Habakkuk 1:1-2:4]

 

Please Pray for All Those Persecuted by Islam

There are many, many suffering brothers and sisters who desperately need us to pray for them...

http://www.persecution.org/
http://www.britishpakistanichristians.co.uk/

http://www.releaseinternational.org/index.php
http://www.barnabasfund.org/

"Remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them;
and them which suffer adversity, as being yourselves also in the body"
(Hebrews 13:3)

 

 

 

 

 

© Bayith Ministries     http://www.bayith.org     bayith@blueyonder.co.uk