"Muhammed was once a refugee taken in by the Jewish City of Medina.
Within 5-years he had driven out, executed, or enslaved every Jew there" [source]

"Aren't refugees supposed to be women, children, and families? The Muslim refugees are 70% males under the age of 30.
These aren't refugees, they are jihadists heading off to war" [source]

"We have 50 million Muslims in Europe. There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe - without swords, without guns, without conquest -
will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades" [Muammar Gaddafi]

"When you move a hamster into an aquarium, it doesn't become a fish" [source: at 19:20]

"God ... hath made ... all nations of men ... and hath determined ... the bounds of their habitation; That they should seek the LORD" (Acts 17:26-27)

"You can avoid reality but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality" [Ayn Rand, quoted at source]

al-Hijrah (Jihad by Emigration) and the Jizya Tax (Entitlement)

"There is no doubt whatsoever that the flow of migrants into Europe is an intentional process on the part of EU leaders. many of them - especially German Chancellor Angela Merkel - are on record saying how important it is to invite all this diversity into Europe. The recent tsunami has obviously taken them by surprise, but it is exactly what they wanted - just not this fast. They didn't want the immigrants entering this quickly because the indigenous people of Europe might become alarmed by the influx and take action to throw their leaders out of office. This would not do. Those leaders want native Europeans to remain asleep so that the process of population replacement can be completed before they realize it" [source].

"[I]f they are really fleeing from a greater danger than the one presented by dangerous boat journeys, why did the ones who landed in Greece insist on barging into Hungary, where they are now making such a fuss about going to Germany? Shouldn't people fleeing from war zones just be glad to be out of them without making demands about precisely where they want to end up?" [comment at source].

"It is awful to see bewildered, crying children, but why are they being dragged into dangerous, frightening and uncertain situations by their parents? Is it really because the place they've come from is even more intolerable? If so, why do they spurn the refuge they are given where they land and insist on travelling much further, through borders and barbed wire, to reach the northern countries such as Germany or the UK? [comment at source].

"You really think these crowds of young men chanting 'Germany!' in the heart of Budapest are 'asylum-seekers' or 'refugees'? Refugees don't confront the police of the countries in which they seek sanctuary. They don't chant orchestrated slogans or lie across train tracks. And why, by the way, do they use the English name for Germany when they chant? In Arabic and Turkish, that country is called 'Almanya', in Kurdish something similar. The Germans themselves call it 'Deutschland'. In Hungarian, it's 'Nemetorszag'. Did someone hope that British and American TV would be there? I've said it before, and I'll say it again: spontaneous demonstrations take a lot of organising. Refugees don't demand or choose their refuge. They ask and they hope. When we become refugees one day (as we may well do), we will discover this. As to what those angry, confident and forceful young men actually are, I'll leave you to work it out, as I am too afraid of the Thought Police to use what I think is the correct word" [source].

"It is easy to be swayed by photos of a young child who has died or boatloads crammed to the gunnels with miserable looking people to the point where the resolution to defend your native territory is overridden, but look at the aggression and sense of entitlement [of] the invaders, for that is what they are, as they battle to leave Hungary. They are in the position of supplicants but far from begging for help they demand as a right that they be let into the richer countries of Europe" [source].

"The two Eritrean refugees that were chopping peoples' heads off in a Swedish IKEA recently were also not 'timid souls fleeing war and persecution'. To let any Muslims into a civilised country is highly dangerous and does nothing to stem the cause of these religious wars. By allowing this mass migration you are simply moving war to Europe" [comment at source].

"A picture paints a thousand words... these pictures we're seeing are of cheating lying scroungers playing the political correctness card game. And Europe have fallen for it hook line and sinker. Won't be long now until mass beheadings and assaults are rife throughout Europe. How stupid the EU have been with all their big ideas and policies and rules. It's tripped them up this time" [comment at source].

"I think those fit young men would be better fighting for their country rather than looking for a soft life, benefits, housing, etc..." [comment at source].

"Look at them with their mobile phones, self-portraits and V-signs. Imagine it's the year 1939 and Axis-pact military forces have taken over most of Europe and are massing to invade us. Then imagine what would have happened if thousands of able-bodied young British men had chosen to get into boats and flee to America instead of standing up to fight for their country. Imagine what would have happened to our cities if the brave, outnumbered pilots of the RAF had elected to fly West over the Atlantic rather than stay and confront the Luftwaffe hordes. You all know the answers" [comment at source].

"The head of a UNHCR camp called Syrian refugees 'The most difficult refugees I've ever seen.'  In Bulgaria, they complained that there were no jobs. In Sweden, they took off their clothes to protest that it was too cold. In Italy, Muslim African 'refugees' rejected pasta and demanded food from their own countries. But the cruel Europeans who 'mistreat' migrants set up a kitchen in Calais with imported spices cooked by a Michelin chef determined to give them the stir-fried rabbit and lamb meatballs they're used to. There are also mobile phone charging stations so the destitute refugees can check on their Facebook accounts. It had to be done because the refugees in Italy were throwing rocks at police while demanding free WiFi. This is the tawdry sense of entitlement of the Syrian Muslim refugee that the media champions" [source].

"Hussein said: 'We have the feeling that the aid workers are heartless.'  (He) lives in a trailer that cost $3,000. The air-conditioner runs with electricity he is tapping from the Italian hospital. The water for his tea is from canisters provided by UNICEF. He hasn't worked, paid or thanked anyone for any of it. And why would he? He's entitled to it by virtue of his superiority as a Muslim and our inferiority as infidels. There is no sense of gratitude. Only constant demands as if the people who drove out their own Christians and Jews have some moral claim on the charity of the Christians and Jews of the West" [source].

"the more you give to them, the more they ask for. It's never enough. Never, never. When we cross their paths, it's always 'give money', 'give phone'. And if you don't give, you get beat up. And don't count on the police to help you ... they don't even register complaints anymore. ... They want 2000 euros pocket money per month ... they want a car, and also a house" [source].

"So let's talk about housing. Madame Bouchard has expelled people in Calais from their homes because those were situated in the Dunes area, close to the Jungle. Indeed this proximity meant that they were being robbed and beaten on a regular basis. So she expelled them, even though they were paying their rent. I myself am being thrown out of my house next month. My house is being confiscated, even though we've always been honest people. ... A court decided to sell the house, even though we've done nothing wrong. My husband is suffering from cancer, but that doesn't change anything. The French must be crushed and thrown out, their property seized to make room for the racaille intent on colonizing us" [source].

"The well-dressed women in their headgear push $1000 triple decker SUV strollers while texting into costly new cell phones 'donated' by companies like Wind Mobile. Where was Wind Mobile when poor Canadians couldn't afford a phone? They all drive new luxury SUVs and sedans, parked in front of their rent free townhouses. ... Since these people are clearly not refugees, they should be stripped of their special status and made to repay the handouts like any ordinary immigrants. No more VIP handouts and free rides" [comment at source].

"Every day now, I see Canadian tenants being thrown out and replaced with well-off Muslims. Those recipients of our largesse repay our generosity by looking down their noses and sneering at us lowly Canadian kaffir. No wonder, after all they are the new royalty in Canada! That's the real reason why our disgusting sellout leadership took down the Queen's portrait" [comment at source].

"After seeing these 'refugees' at a stay in a Montreal airport, they were very well dressed with gold bangles and jewelry, Versachi and Gucci bags with kids running around trashing the place with no supervision. These are NOT refugees, but scammers taking advantage of a stupid P.M. And why are they granted citizenship when they land? If they were refugees, fine, house them until their country stabilizes then bye bye. Why instant citizenship, makes no sense" [comment at source].

"[T]his whole 'Syrian refugee' debacle is a 'vanity project' for that vainglorious peacock Emperor Justpoleon to show off as he struts across the world stage! These people were NOT in dire straits! These people were NOT starving! These people took their valuables with them, fled Syria when the going got tough, and then seized this opportunity to double up on their good fortune by taking advantage of all that this Boy Blunder had to offer. The Canadian public certainly has been duped big time" [comment at source].

"The migrants who have been offered asylum are refusing the Greeks' kind offer just as those in Calais have refused the French offer. Real refugees do not pick and choose" [quote at source].

"This is no longer just a 'refugee crisis'. This is a hijrah. Hijrah is the Islamic doctrine of migration, which is a form of stealth jihad" [source].

"One in four people living in Bradford according to the 2011 census was muslim. One in four in Luton. Other cities are not far behind. From the Muslim Council of Britain's website... '33% of the Muslim population was aged 15 years or under in 2011, compared to 19% of the population as a whole.'  How long before a British city or town has a majority muslim population?" [comment at source].

"It's the insidious infiltration of our society and culture that is the danger and the failure of politicians to control it, assert our laws and make it plain that Islam will never get the chance to dominate our country by means of hijrah. There needs to be segregation between Muslims and the civilised world. That means stop immigration, create a hostile environment for Islam, and introduce repatriation" [comment at source].

"The Muslims in Europe are practising hijrah on a massive scale: that is migration to non-muslim lands with the intention of converting some, outbreeding the rest and taking over the country. The imams make sure that hijrah stays on track by foiling any attempt to integrate with majority population. Does anyone think that all the 'blameless, moderate' muslims would resist their keener co-religionists and fight on the side of the true native people so that they could keep their rightful land? Not if they wanted to live" [comment at source].

See also the section: The Doctrine of Immigration (Al-Hijra) here for more on the Islamic doctrine of Hijrah.

The Impact on Public Services

"Immigrants don't want to stay in Italy or Greece - they ant to move north to Austria, Germany, Britain, and Sweden, where the welfare benefits are the most generous" [source].

"It is entirely disingenuous for our leaders not to acknowledge that an influx of refugees has an impact on public services - not just in health, but in education, housing and welfare. What frustrates me is that the people so enthusiastically insisting that we welcome large numbers are not the ones who will feel the pain of all this. The Twitter hashtag mob will, largely, continue with their comfortable lives untouched. It's mostly the poor and the sick who will feel the impact of refugees coming into their community" [source].

"There are 52 million Muslims in Europe... 80% of them are on welfare. This system smacks of the socialist Cloward-Piven strategy of overwhelming the public welfare system in order to provoke a collapse, and replace it with a national system. Muslims are hoping that replacement system will be the Sharia Islamic legal system. ... We know this from interviews right here in the US, with non-US Muslims brought here by Obama at the directive of the UN" [source].

"The stark reality of mass immigration is that those who advocate taking in immigrants ... are stealing from the poorer of their own people. Let me list what they steal: (1) Employment, both by taking jobs and by reducing wages; (2) Housing, both by taking housing (including large amounts of social housing) and by forcing up house prices and private rents; (3) School opportunities, by both taking places and reducing the quality of the schooling available to the British children through larger classes and the extra time and money devoted to dealing with children who speak inadequate English; (4) University opportunities, both by immigrants taking places (especially in subjects such as medicine) and by the reduction in the quality of the education offered through immigrant students having poor English or by being simply intellectually inadequate. There is a strong venal incentive for universities to take larger numbers of such people because, unlike British and EU students, students from outside the EU pay the full cost of their courses. A large part of the university learning experience depends on student interaction both inside and outside the classroom. The poorer the quality of students, the less opportunity for the able student to learn because of the inability of inadequate students to express themselves intelligently; (5) Healthcare. GP's surgeries are being swamped in many areas because of immigration and anyone who has visited a NHS hospital recently in places such as London will have been astonished at the number of foreign patients there are" [source].

"Do you realize that local shops have lost between 40% and 60% of their business? Before this, Calais used to be thriving, lively, gay. Foreigners would always come during the Summer vacation time, and during the end of year festivities. Today, nothing is left of that. Nothing. The shops in the town center have shut down, one after the other. Calais is a dead city, because of the clandestines we have here ... they descend upon the town armed with iron bars and even Molotvov cocktails" [source].

"Natacha Bouchard ... has done nothing for the inhabitants of Calais. She received millions of euros of help destined to support the local economy. The first thing she did with that money was to build containers to house the migrants. ... The only jobs she created in Calais, and I know this through a friend was who was offered such a job, were fifty long-term positions to clean up the migrants' refuse in the jungle. Those are the jobs offered by Madame Bouchard" [source].

"Canada's poor and vulnerable citizens should be shaking in their boots now. I'm one of them, since I'm disabled. People like us already have a hard time accessing social services like housing and health care. My clinic was converted to 'Muslim Only' just like many public housing projects in Toronto. Now whom do you think the Liberals will be taking social services funding from? I've been waiting years for housing, living in a building that's surrounded by public projects. Now I can count on waiting at least twice as long, since affluent Syrians get a pass to the head of the wait list. ... I hobble down the street past [their rent free townhouses] on my cane because I can't afford bus fare. My rent is three quarters of my income. Can't afford my meds either, Ontario cut my pharma assistance - but Syrians get free drugs. Those of you who aren't poor will be hit as well. Prepare for huge payroll deduction increases for CPP [Canada pension Plan] and EI [Employment Insurance]. Prepare for massive tax hikes. Get ready for service cuts. All to provide a free VIP lifestyle for affluent, hostile invaders" [comment at source].

Crime, Violence, and Lawlessness

"In Germany it is said the migrants are the personal guests of the chancellor, who has been the main political driving force behind their arrival. This is a point that has even been acknowledged by a German judge, who last year ruled that migrants who committed crimes in the pursuit of entering Germany could be forgiven" [source].

"Underling the element of choice Europe has had in accepting the migrant crisis, the article [referred to here] cites the early signs of extreme violence perpetrated by migrants - in this case on each other. Recalling an asylum centre riot in Germany ... in August where inmates part-demolished their own taxpayer funded homes because of a dispute over the Koran and attacked police officers while screaming 'Allahu Akhbar', Ms. Rybinska [the author of the article] also recounted the fates of Christian asylum seekers beaten by their Muslim counterparts" [source].

"After seeing these 'refugees' at a stay in a Montreal airport ...  with kids running around trashing the place ... Before you rent a motel, make sure [they] are not being housed there, they destroy and dominate the place" [comment at source].

"To ensure the long-term safety of the British people and their culture, we must stop immigration from Muslim societies. Even the most moderate of Muslim-majority countries are immersed in serious human rights abuses. Even the best Islam has to offer is a crime in the civilised world, and many Muslims have no intention of being 'educated' by Westerners to change. Despite this, despite our complete inability to police the crimes that accompany Muslim immigration (including mass rape of non-Muslim women and girls) we continue to keep the borders open for more. This must stop" [source].

"We should end foreign aid (except in emergencies) and use those resources to restore the authority of the law in Britain. If those breaching immigration laws won't return to their native lands, they should be held in detention until they do. We have got to get tough and we have to do it soon. We will take no orders from unelected international bodies but work with allies against the global threat of sharia. None of this is controversial, it is merely the imposition of law as determined by the British majority. It is merely treating Muslims like everyone else and holding them to the same standards" [source].

"All non-Britons convicted of a violent crime (or involved in terrorism) should be deported from this country, because the British people must come first. It is the most important and moral and democratic duty of those who seek our vote. It's time for a political party to realize this" [source].

ISIS Jihadis Posing as Refugees

"These migrants are generally referred to by our political leaders and the media as 'refugees', but this is hardly the case. Not only are most of them from countries where there is no war to flee from, but they are also overwhelmingly young Muslim men, of fighting age. In other words, the current crisis is actually an instance of Islamic hijra, or migration into infidel lands to advance their cause of Islam. The hijra goes hand in hand with jihad - once enough Muslim migrants have settled in the target country, violent jihad can begin. It should be quite clear by now that the jihad phase has already begun in Western Europe. The most recent instances were the massacres in Paris and Brussels, which were acts of jihad carried out by Muslims. Some of the terrorists were in fact 'refugees' who had pretended to be 'Syrian' and came in with the migrant wave" [source].

"The media feed the public a steady stream of photos and videos that feature pitiful migrant women and children. We see them looking through the razor wire towards 'freedom', weeping, cooking their food over a campfire, and being pushed back by border guards. yet these images are so misleading that they constitute disinformation. The ugly fact is that the overwhelming majority of the 'refugees' are healthy young men who either have no wives and children, or left them behind to seize the opportunity for hijra into Europe. They come from Afghanistan, Morocco, Eritrea, and Pakistan, but they acquire forged or stolen passports so that they become 'Syrian', and thus qualify for VIP status in the flood of refugees" [source].

"We are being deliberately manipulated. The Western public is being manipulated into supporting the migration of fighting-age Muslim men into Europe" [source].

"Islamic State is using the refugee crisis to form a fifth column of Muslim fighters inside Western nations. ... 'Jihad is not only a violent phenomenon but can be pursued by many other means, including hijra.' Isis operatives are taking advantage of Western nations' generosity toward refugees to infiltrate Europe" [source].

"The ranks of the refugees include possible war criminals like Abu Hussein, the commander of a Free Syrian Army militia named the Falcons of the Tribe of the Prophet Mohammed, who controls portions of a UNHCR refugee camp and threatens to kill aid workers when they won't give him what he wants. The bleeding hearts of Europe and America want to take in the cute kiddies, but they'll be getting the Husseins instead who will be running neighborhoods in London, Paris and Toronto. And then the kindly natives will notice that their daughters are coming home late and wonder what is happening to them. Syria will happen to them. Just as Pakistan and Afghanistan happened to the British girls victimised by the Muslim sex grooming gangs in the UK. Just as Saudi Arabia happened to us on September 11" [source].

"A popular meme claims that the UK has taken in only enough refugees to fit on a subway train. My question to the meme spreaders is how would they like to be on that train, wedged between the terrorists, the sex groomers and the Sunnis and Shiites trying to reach across and throttle each other" [source].

"What about the national security implications? We know that ISIS is actively placing jihadists among the hundreds of thousands of Syrian migrants. It is imperative to ask - how many additional thousand Islamist jihadists are we prepared to accept after the UN refugee agency fails to screen them them out? The FBI has said that it does not have the tools or the manpower to screen the refugees. Asking them to do so is insane. ... If [Congress] can't say no to 10,000 jihadist-infiltrated refugees, they should just resign, close up shop and go home" [source].

"These so-called Muslim refugees overwhelming Europe are heard chanting what Jihadists often do: 'Allahu Akbar'. ... Muslim Jihadis are mixing into secular Muslim populations that are pouring into Western nations" [source].

"Most of these asylum seekers are mainly Muslim men of military age, and they will sabotage Germany, reducing it to civil war. Instead of smoothly running factories, there will be bombings, and riots in the streets. When Germany goes up in flames again, it will be because of the betrayal of Germans by their own degenerate, treacherous leaders" [comment at: source].

"It's our dream that there should be a caliphate not only in Syria but in all the world and we will have it soon, [Allah] willing. They are going like refugees. Others just go to Europe to be ready" [ISIS operative, quoted at: source].

"Europe is at war. Will European authorities continue to aid and abet the enemy, and invite Muslim migrants into their countries in large numbers, despite the presence of jihad terrorists among them?" [source].

Emotional Propaganda Trumps Rational Thoughtfulness

"One aspect of the crisis that is very important [is] the manipulation by the mainstream media of the news about the migrants. ... The image that sparked Western interest in the crisis was the widely-publicised photograph of the dead toddler on the beach in Turkey. That photo is an example of media manipulation. Not about the fact of the baby's death, but what was done with his little body once he was dead. There is now ample evidence that the body was moved and arranged in place so that the most heart-wrenching photo could be taken. ... For journalists working for Der Spiegel or Le Figaro or The Guardian or CNN, the media narrative is more important than the truth. And the media narrative was (and is) that poor innocent refugees are drowning because they are left to die by evil Europeans. ... It's what [has been termed] 'Dead Baby Porn'." [source].

"It is, of course quite right that Europe has woken to the sheer scale of human suffering in Syria. It is equally right that our compassionate instincts will drive us to fund-raise and campaign for the innocent victims of the conflict. But that compassion must be realistic and clear-headed" [source].

"If you cast your mind back a few weeks, many of us pointed out ... how come we were being told in reports about the poor women and children being forced to flee, but only saw strapping young men in their early twenties, be it in the leaking boats in the Mediterranean or in the Calais camps. So then we got photos of young women and children ... some were so obviously faked that people were reminded of a certain practice in certain Middle Eastern countries of using children as human shields. ... [These] photos and reports are now the staple of EU MSM reports. You'll also have noticed that suddenly there's hardly anything written about Calais. Have they perhaps all vanished all of a sudden?" [source].

"The MSM will use all and any tear-jerking photos, images and stories to brainwash us all, to make us vote based on emotions, not on facts. ... That's how and why this photo of that truly innocent little boy finally has worked in the way the EU Establishment - in the EU member state capitals as well as in Brussels - have always wanted: emotions and feelings trumping facts. ... That's why that photo worked - and that's why we better prepare for more of such images" [source].

"I think we need to be fully aware of the propaganda war going on here - not just in regard to mixing up asylum seekers, politically persecuted people, refugees, and economic migrants who are mostly illegal immigrants. The concerted crocodile tears about that drowned little boy shows clearly how politicians and MSM are working in concert: make people feel sad and outraged, so that politicians can 'help' alleviate the hurt and outrage - by taking in more 'refugees' who are generally young healthy males belonging to a certain religion ... Do we really want more Rotherhams?" [comment at source].

"[I]t has now come to pass that anybody at all who dares to question a policy of 'we will take you all, regardless' is branded as a disgusting right-wing populist without heart. ... The very strange thing is that this vituperative attitude isn't shown against the people smugglers. Those smugglers seem to be some sort of protected species, as far as the Left is concerned. They don't even shout about the inhumanity of their profiteering from the misery of others, ... You've heard about the now 70 people found dead in a truck in Austria, ... Allegedly, the doors of that truck had been wired shut. Am I the only one who sees a disturbing and disgusting parallel to the use of trucks, doors locked, as 'extermination' instruments during that inhumane regime in Germany over 70 years ago? How and why is it that the EU Left does not see this but would rather fight and besmirch those in the EU member states who can see that unlimited immigration is unsustainable? Have we now reached the point where emotions, feelings, irrational 'empathy' are all that matter, and where rational though is deemed to be hard-hearted and beyond the pale?" [source].

"Surely we need open, rational debate so we can thrash out solutions. If people's worries or objections are unfounded, then expose them to the light and watch them wither away. Don't try to shove them under the carpet" [source].

Regarding "the news reports ... arm-waving, hand-wringing, over-excited and emotive accounts of their plight, designed to evoke sympathy rather than state facts. It is awful to see bewildered, crying children, but why are they being dragged into dangerous, frightening and uncertain situations by their parents? Is it really because the place they've come from is even more intolerable? If so, why do they spurn the refuge they are given where they land and insist on travelling much further, through borders and barbed wire, to reach the northern countries such as Germany or the UK? I'd like an explanation of these and other questions from the reporters, but they just don't seem interested in asking them. This isn't news reporting, but propaganda" [comment at source].

"[O]ne's got to read publications from elsewhere [than the MSM] to get an impression beyond that pushed by the hacks. ... We're being played for fools, and asking questions ... means that, in the eyes of the Westminster Establishment, [we] are heartless, xenophobic and extreme right-wing. It's only about emotions now, not about facts" [comment at source].

"[M]assive propaganda, lying, obfuscation, subterfuge, blackmail of dissenters and sheer terror at the hand of the states' and EU's ruling elites, hired 'anti-racist' hounds, journalists groomed by postmodern Marxist mentors, freelance Antifa shock troops, and their Muslim allies. The psychotic illusion started long ago, when Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi foisted his European Union 'dream' onto the European elite in the 1920s. The elite then foisted it on a bamboozled population, beginning in the 1950s-60s" [source].

"[I]n the UK, families of British jihadists killed in Syria are preparing to sue the government for compensation. ... [T]he centrist Daily Express reports that a sign with Kitchener telling Muslims to get out of Britain is 'sick hate'; par for the course in a country that sentenced its own Royal Marine to life in prison for killing a Taliban enemy. ... [T]he hashtag #refugeeswelcome is the hottest Twitter thing among British 'celebrities', exceeding even their self-loving selfies. ... Actress Emma Thompson, reports the British press, blasts her country's failure to take on more refugees as 'racist'. No one reports why Western mass media consider the socio-political opinions of nincompoops with good cheekbones and a talent for mimicry worthy of publication" [source].

"It's the sympathy of the bleeding hearts that leads to dead children whose parents are willing to risk their lives for their own economic goals. The left creates the crisis and then indicts everyone else for refusing to accept its solution that would make it even worse. The 'humanitarian catastrophe' in which migrants use their children as photogenic human shields would go away if the doors were closed to everyone except real refugees who were not part of this war. The only thing that taking in fake refugees does is attract more of them and that empowers the left which uses dead children for its power and profit at more places than just Planned Parenthood" [source].

"This lack of logic over immigration thickens the general air of unreality which envelops the BBC and the EU. Watching BBC coverage of current events sometimes feels like getting reports from a parallel universe in which everything looks much like it does in our world, but in which all the conclusions are the diametric opposite of those which a rational, sensible human being would draw: the EU and the BBC both seem certain that the only way to solve a problem is to do even more of what caused it in the first place, whether that be more Europe, more bureaucrats, more green energy, more public spending, or more migrants. And both organisations seem utterly convinced that those who warn of a potential problem are always somehow guilty of causing it. (A similar warped logic dictates that the beliefs of a religion in whose name innocents are being slaughtered around the globe are to be accorded the utmost respect, while the beliefs of those who follow a religion which isn't killing anybody, and which lies at the very heart of our civilisation, are to be dismissed with contempt" [source].

"This is how Herr H. manipulated millions: by working them up into an emotional frenzy instead of appealing to their rational thought processes" [comment at source].

Moral Pornography and Narcissistic Virtue Signalling

"[W]hen thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do ... in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily, I say unto you, They have their reward. But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth. That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly"  (The Holy Bible, Matthew 6:2-4)

"If your only source of information regarding Europe's current migrant catastrophe was the BBC, you might have gathered that the only migrants seeking to enter the EU are refugees from Middle East war zones, and that most of the men are doctors who all speak impeccable English and who are invariably accompanied by their wives and children. An item on the corporation's News site entitled 'Migration to Europe explained in seven charts' includes three photographs of migrants, all prominently featuring women and children. None of the charts breaks down asylum seekers by age, marital status or profession (if any), but several highlight Britain's lack of generosity in accepting migrants compared to our compassionate European partners. It fails to mention that 72% of those who have attempted to cross the Mediterranean are adult males, while just 13% are adult women. But is the BBC as whole focusing on this point? Of course not? The danger inherent in a mass influx of young, unmarried, mainly uneducated Muslim men is obviously the threat of Islamophobic violence from the Far Right (i.e. anyone to the right of David Cameron): the threat of 'radicalisation' stems from xenophobic hostility to those who do manage to get here" [source].

"[I]nfluential groups in society are exerting pressure - consciously or unconsciously - to stop [opposing] arguments, and the feelings behind them, being expressed. It's psychologically unhealthy for people to think they have no right to voice sincerely held convictions. And at a practical level, it's dangerously counterproductive for dissenting voices to be shouted down by a chorus of people desperate to show how caring they are" [source].

"These people are merely telling us about themselves. Public expressions of compassion signify that a person is good. Their absence demonstrates heartlessness. This has been called 'virtue signalling', or mandatory emoting, and it has now reached its crazy apotheosis in the great migration crisis" [source].

"This ostentatious virtue-signalling - for that is all it is - serves two purposes. Firstly, it makes them look like nicer people - not remotely right-wing or Islamophobic or any of the other horrid things nice people don't want to be. Secondly, it's the perfect form of issue avoidance - enabling them to touch briefly on a matter of great public concern and then, almost simultaneously, to pretend that the problem doesn't exist or that at least if it does exist, [right-wingers] are much, much worse" [source].

"'Dead Baby Porn' tugs at the heartstrings of well-meaning Westerners. It reinforces all their presuppositions about current events. It gives them a vicarious frisson about the poor, suffering child. And, in their response, it makes them feel morally superior when they join the clamor to open their country's borders to the unfortunate 'refugees'." [source].

"In one survey, only one in four people favoured taking in more than 10,000 refugees. In another, two-thirds said they were worried that the images of drowned children risked distorting the debate. Yet on social media and among our broadcasters and politicians, there's a very different consensus. In fact, people in these groups - often privileged, always fond of their own voices - have been competing with each other to insist we offer asylum to ever greater numbers. Those who haven't joined this collective orgy of emotion are condemned as immoral, cruel and stupid. ... [They] not only over-rate their own goodness and competence, but they also dangerously underrate the abilities and humanity of those who dare disagree with them" [source].

"I suppose it should not be a surprise that the virtue signalling over the appalling plight of Syrian refugees displaced by that country's monstrous civil war has bow reached fresh heights of absurdity. Nor that some of the press coverage of this dreadful crisis is edging towards a post-Diana level of mawkishness. One front page this morning shouts at David Cameron, demanding the Prime Minister SHOW YOUR HUMANITY. ... Then, on ITV's Murnaghan programme this morning, Nicola Sturgeon and Yvette Cooper were asked if they would house Syrian refugees in their own homes. Obviously they had to say yes and we may now expect the same question to be asked of every politician in Britain. If it's good enough for Nicola and Yvette - and Bob Geldof - then why isn't it good enough for you? ...  Can we agree this is ridiculous? True, nothing says I'm a pretty decent kind of person better than scribbling #RefugeesWelcome on a piece of paper and then posing for a selfie and posting said selfie on Twitter or Facebook. Twibbons are so yesterday, don't you know? I don't doubt the sincerity of the people behaving in this fashion. ... But let's at least try and recall the scale of the problem ... for how long are they prepared to host a family of Syrian refugees in their own property? Six weeks? Six months? Six years?" [source].

"We all know about the problem of sexual pornography on the internet. Now we need to talk about the problem of moral pornography. And nothing better illustrates it than the photo of Aylan, a three-year-old Syrian who drowned alongside his five-year-old brother Galip, his mother and others ... The global spreading of this snapshot - which appears on the front page of the Independent today and inside the Guardian, and is even callously being turned into a meme by sections of the weeping Twitterati - is justified as a way of raising awareness about the migrant crisis. Please. It's more like a snuff photo for progressives, dead-child porn, designed not to start a serious debate about migration in the 21st century but to elicit a self-satisfied feeling of sadness among Western observers. ... marvel at the purity of your emotional response to it, and be sure to tell everyone what your emotional response was. 'I cried so hard' thousands of tweeters are saying. The operative word being 'I'." [source].

"There's a tradition of pushing victimised or dead kids to the front of news reporting. And more recently they've been given a starring role in the Twitterati's handwringing over global calamities. ... the sad or hungry or dead child has become a substitute for serious analysis or rational commentary. It shuts down discussion. ... It's cheap moralism, emotionalism taking the place of thoughtfulness. ... This narcissistic search for outlets for our tenderness has increased a million-fold with the dawn of the internet, when not only can we gawp at more images of destitute, destroyed kids, but we can republish them too, signalling our virtue and emotional sensitivity. It can be cruel and unnecessary. it's the victory of the visceral over the rational. And we really need a rational debate about the migrant crisis, rather than people holding up a dead-child snuff photos and saying: 'I cried, therefore I'm good'" [source].

"A 30 week old baby died two weeks ago; his English mum and dad [were] left to live in a car by the local council ... We British must get off our rears ... Like the 1400 girls and boys in Rotherham, we just said 'How terrible!'  That is all we do daily. We will die saying 'Oh how terrible!'  No backbone left. ... While these disgusting prancing emotional feely-touchy vampires feed their habit and fixation of attention 'oooh look at me! I am wonderful!' we should be collecting their names for future arrest and trial if we come out of this awful evolving tragedy. Look at the placard these smug so and sos are holding? It is the same one. This is organised. Where were they when 1400 girls and boys were trafficked ad raped, even killed. No placard for the little boy dying in a car" [comment at source].

"It is incredible that [LGBT Support Migrants] want to welcome a group of people that detest them. Have they already forgotten what the so-called 'Muslim Patrol' did in East London a Year or so ago? Do they not recall the 'Gay [sic] Free Zone' stickers plastered all over the area? Are they blind to the fate of gays [sic] in Muslim countries?" [comment at source].

"I predicted this ten years and more ago. I was called 'mad' and all the rest - even 'scary' and 'dangerous'. Well it's happened now ... Class enjoy your assuaged borrowed guilt ... Call me what you like 'Liberals', but God - and He does exist - will call you a lot worse as will your progeny" [comment at source].

The No Borders Activists

"There's been a new development here recently: the No Borders activists. They are the worst racaille on the face of the Earth. They are the ones inciting the clandestines to riot in Calais. It's even worse than that. They post themselves across the town and coordinate riots using walkie talkies" [source].

"The problem is that the West is full of young people who are deluded and ignorant of recent history. Open borders is the cry, tear down statues that offend they cry and most of them have never had to fight for anything, let alone freedom, in their lives!" [comment at: source].

"Young people aren't just ignorant of history, they're also actively manipulated. The strategy revolves around pushing ideas that deny any need to take individual responsibility for things that matter while pushing the idea of taking 'social responsibility' for vague abstract things that are either useless, or very low priority, or counterproductive. In short, the strategy is [to] encourage them to behave irresponsibly toward individuals around them, while supporting anything that can, of course, only be solved through increased central government authority. Therefore 'social responsibility' is redefined so that it no longer refers as much to individual behaviour but refers more to supporting centralized authoritarianism which is of course pushed as the only way to solve the problems that they are being encouraged to create" [comment at: source].

"The oddest aspect of the EU's open borders policy and the BBC's support for it is that the left-liberal elites which have been busily feminising European manhood have now opened their arms (well, our arms, actually) to hordes of the most unreconstructed, hairy-chested, misogynistic, male chauvinists on the planet. The EU plans to force publicly-listed companies to reserve 40% of their board seats for women (inevitably the BBC has signalled its virtue by announcing a 50% quota by 2020) - while leaving European women vulnerable to attacks by testosterone-charged young men from relatively primitive cultures where an uncovered female head is regarded as an open invitation to abuse. Is there something about the unfettered masculinity of these recent arrivals that awakens atavistic urges in those liberals who have created a society in their metrosexual image?" [source].

Zakat (The Third Pillar of Islam):
Islamic Charity/Aid Towards Other Muslims, Especially the Destitute

"Most, if not all of them, are Muslims. Why are they not fleeing to nearby muslim countries instead of making hazardous journeys to Europe, where there is rising tension with muslim populations?" [comment at source].

"[W]hy aren't filthy rich Saudi Arabia and other oil-rich muslim nations stepping forward to take refugees of their own faith?" [comment at source].

"Is it really such a novel idea that refugees from a Middle East civil war should be resettled in the Middle East, not Europe and America?" [source].

"Why are we allowing Saudi Arabia and several other wealthy Middle East nations to take in ZERO refugees? Why are Syrian, Iraqi and Libyan refugees not being resettled in wealthy neighboring countries instead of Europe and the US?" [source].

"Some will not like me saying this, but in recent years, there has been too much Muslim mass immigration to Europe. This has resulted in ghettos of Muslim communities living parallel lives to mainstream society, following their own customs and even their own laws. Isn't it high-time instead for the oil-rich Gulf States to open their doors to the many Muslims are are fleeing conflict? Surely if they are concerned for fellow Muslims who prefer to live in Muslim-majority countries, then they have a moral responsibility to intervene" [source].

"[T]wo key issues about Muslim refugees: one, we know that many of them are in fact jihadists seeking to get a free pass not the West to wage war against it. Two, there are plenty of wealthy Muslim nations in the immediate vicinity which are refusing to take in any refugees. Now that is the height of hypocrisy, and genuine discrimination. They refuse to take in their own, and some have even said the reason for this is because they are worried about terrorism! Why can Muslim nations be rightly worried about Muslim terrorism while Western nations are just supposed to turn a blind eye to all this, and take in anyone who demands to be let in? That of course is a recipe for national suicide" [source].

"Western media is reporting on the Muslim refugee crisis as a humanitarian problem that the West must deal with. But where are the media's questions about the huge financial and land resources available to oil-rich Arab and Muslim countries? Where are the Islamic solutions in this equation? The World is often lectured to about the urgency of respecting Arab and Islamic brotherly love, but where is the Arab action to rescue fellow Muslims and Arabs from the claws of ISIS?" [source].

"Where is the wealthy Arab League to coordinate safe cities on Arab land that extends from Morocco to Iraq and from Northern Syria to Sudan? ... Where are the mighty Arab armies who waged dozens of wars against Israel? Why aren't they fighting ISIS and building tent cities in the vast deserts of Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and the wealthy Gulf States? They are all claiming they are 'moderate' Muslims and that they are against ISIS. But [what] is one substantive thing that have done?" [source].

"Where are the thousands of Islamic human rights groups operating in the West, the likes of CAIR and ISNA, who are dedicating their energy and millions of dollars to stop discrimination against Muslims and 'Islamophobia' in the West? This is the same West that their refugees are escaping to" [source].

"Where are the Arab feminists, especially those who demonstrated against France for banning the hijab? They are silent and doing nothing to rescue thousands of women that are victims of Islamic jihadist rape and enslavement. The only compassionate women helping women in the Middle East are the Christian mother [sic] Teresas and Kayla Muellers of the western world" [source].

"Arab countries lack compassion and action to rescue each other despite the rhetoric of Arab/Islamic unity. Saudi Arabia and Gulf nations never open their borders to poor Muslims in distress. Even Egypt rejected the Darfur refugees who were later forced to go to Israel, which took them in" [source].

"Arabs would rather spend their petrodollars on expanding their influence in the West ... than making life better for their own citizens or supporting other Muslim nations who are financially less fortunate" [source].

"Islamic groups believe that refugees from Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan will spread Sharia in Europe, which is the main goal of jihad. ... Life and saving lives and avoiding human tragedy are not more important than jihad in Arab culture" [source].

"We are told that the Syrian refugees 'stir the conscience' of the world; certainly not the Muslim world. The Saudis don't want them. Jordan and Turkey have resentfully set up refugee camps without actually offering permanent legal status to them the way that Europe, Canada and America are expected to. What do Muslim countries know about the Syrian Civil War that we don't? The Saudis, Jordanians and Turks have their own problems. They don't want to import the Syrian Civil War into their own borders. Only the Western countries are stupid enough to do that" [source].

"Curious ... that instead of any of the 56 Islamic countries taking in Muslim 'refugees' it is somehow Europe's responsibility to take these people in... despite the hundreds of thousands of Muslims we already accept every year, and despite the billions of pounds we have poured into Muslim countries to assuage our 'white guilt' or something. I'm still not clear on the reasons we throw taxpayers' money at Islamic nations while neglecting our own people at home. Shouldn't our own people be our first responsibility" [source].

"The United Nations - in various ways a branch of the 57-nation Organization of Islamic Cooperation - issues daily appeals to Europe to do 'more', to engage in a 'massive common effort', despite the curious, total absence of any fabulously rich Muslim state from this humanitarian effort on behalf of Muslims being persecuted by other Muslims" [source].

"Muslims don't have a great track record in helping one another: the old tribal mindset is alive and well. 'Charity' goes to jihad. Some years ago Iran was hit by a devastating earthquake; whole villages were destroyed and people left homeless. The images were awful. I asked an Iranian shopkeeper in our area if there would be any help for children who'd been orphaned, or people who were left homeless. His answer was curt: 'that's for you Americans. In Iran, we don't help strangers.'  When I responded, 'but surely the children...' he shrugged and turned away. End of conversation. My sense of it is that any 'help' offered by Muslims ... is strictly for strategic reasons - to help grow the Ummah" [comment at source].

The Death of Aylan Kurdi

"[A] few inconvenient truths are conveniently overlooked: (a) the wife and the other son of that man also lost their lives, because life belts were only 'issued' to the men, the smugglers included; (b) this family, like so many others, were quite safe in refugee camps in Turkey, but had their immigrant application to Canada refused by the UN, that's why they tried to cross into the EU, i.e. Greece; (c) the despicable people smugglers demand hefty sums of money for their 'work' - nobody asks who pays and how come 'poor' refugees have so much money; (d) these 'refugees' in camps everywhere conveniently all have lost their passports - conveniently because thus they cannot be deported; (e) Suddenly those 'refugees' stuck in Hungary and elsewhere have miraculously 'found' their passports again - and are all Syrians - but ... the huge majority are actually people from Albania and Kosovo who want one thing only: get to Germany, to what they see as 'paradise'" [source].

"Having seen more than my share of real corpses, and watched children starving to death in a Somali famine, I am not unmoved by pictures of a dead child on a Turkish beach. But I am not going to be pretend to be more upset than anyone else. Nor am I going to suddenly stop thinking, as so many people in the media and politics appear to have done. The child is not dead because advanced countries have immigration laws. The child is dead because criminal traffickers cynically risked the lives of their victims in pursuit of money. I'll go further. The use of words such as 'desperate' is quite wrong in this case. The child's family were safe in Turkey. Turkey (for all its many faults) is a member of Nato, officially classified as free and democratic" [source].

This little boy "[A]llegedly 'loved' by everyone who wants to use his death for political reasons. His mother and aunt no doubt loved him, but I have grave doubts about his selfish father who put his whole family's lives at risk unnecessarily. ... every time there is resistance to taking more and more refugees into Europe, the little boy's name and death will be invoked relentlessly by those who care nothing for their own country's stability and security" [comment at source].

"Sad though the death of the small boy (now used to justify more immigration) was it is worth noting that his father has taken him home to be buried. So much for fleeing an inhospitable country. Time for common sense to prevail over the bleeding hearts; only one person was to blame for his death and it does not justify allowing thousands more aliens into our country" [comment at source].

"The kid died because his father wanted new teeth, paid for by his cousin in Canada - they thought the money transfer would be easier from Canada to the UK. He really should be charged with murder for putting his family's life at risk for such a superficial, unnecessary reason" [comment at source].

"In a manner familiar to students of faked and media-fanned 'Israeli atrocities' in Gaza, every image of a dead refugee child, or just one looking distressed, is used skilfully to express more tears from Europe's and America's lachrymose glands. The media has no interest in disclosing that the dead child's father is a smugger of 'refugees' who drove the unsafe boat himself" [source].

"Time to put away the picture of that kid, and look at the situation as it really is" [comment at source].

Operation 'Adopt a Muslim'

"Every one of the posturing notables simpering 'refugees welcome' should be asked if he or she will take a refugee family into his or her home for an indefinite period, and pay for their food, medical treatment and education. If so, they mean it. If not, they are merely demanding that others pay and make room so that they can experience a self-righteous glow. ... As William Blake rightly said: 'He who would do good to another must do it in minute particulars. General good is the plea of the scoundrel, hypocrite and flatterer'." [source].

"If those who advocated mass immigration had to pay a real price for their parading of their conscience you may be assured that their enthusiasm would vanish as quickly as the morning dew. What should be the price? Here are a couple of scenarios: (1) [T]hey should have to take responsibility for that person permanently. By that I mean not only house them but meet all their reasonable needs such as food, clothing, medical and educational costs. They should have no choice about who they are allocated, so there will be no choosing a westernised, well-educated immigrant or two who speak good English; (2) [Or they] and their immediate family [could experience] the conditions the poorer Britons experience. This would require that their family home be requisitioned and the advocate and his or her family moved to basic accommodation in an area absolutely brimming over with the diversity such people religiously extol as being so desirable. The income of the adults involved would be reduced to the bare minimum which the British state says is needed to live. Where there are children of school age, these would be sent to state-funded schools which boast '93 languages spoken here'. If healthcare is required they would have to use a local GP and the nearest appropriate NHS hospital" [source].

"[S]eeing as our political class, progressives and media are hellbent on stuffing this country full of Muslims I thought they could help promote 'community cohesion' by accepting some into their own homes. These Muslims should be chosen from the poorest areas of Pakistan and Somalia so that our politicians get the true flavour - there will be no entrepreneurs and comedians in this lot, let me tell you! I've often felt that our politicians are living in [a] bubble that protects them from reality, so this 'adopt a Muslim' strategy will educate them extremely quickly on what the rest of us have been putting up with. ... If we must accept new Muslim 'refugees that's fine by me just so long as our political class puts their money where their mouth is and take these people into their own homes. The public have been bearing the burden of mass immigration for way too long" [source].

"Congratulations on welcoming your first Muslim into you home! Here are some guidelines to help you adjust to this new situation:  (1) You should be aware that he thinks he is 'the best of people' (Koran 3:110) and you are 'filthy and unclean' (9:28) and of 'the worst of people' (98:6) - so you're off to a good start already!  (2) In the event that he rapes any of the female residents of your home (your wife, your daughter, your mother) just be aware all that is condoned in the Koran. Specifically, the passages relating to the rape of infidel women are 4;3, 4:24, and 33:50. Remember, only racist people get upset about what's written in the Koran!  (3) The Muslim has very specific guidelines on how to behave, as 64% of the Koran is devoted to telling him how to treat you, the infidel ... For example, 48:29 tells him 'Muslims are merciful to each other and are merciless towards the unbelievers', which must be a euphemism for love, tolerance and multiculturalism - right?  (4) Other chapters I would like to bring to your attention are 5:33, where he is instructed to cut one hand and one foot off opposite sides of a person's body for the vague crime of 'causing mischief', 5:45 which instructs him to tear a person's eyes out, 47:4 which tells him to cut your head off, and the many verses related to burning people alive. Again remember, only racist and intolerant people think there's anything wrong with this!" [source].

"Did Bob Geldoff actually take any in after his self-promoting offer? I would like to hear the experiences of any who do" [comment at source].

Christian and Other Non-Muslim Refugees

"If states placed the real victims at the front of the queue - Christians, Yazidis, gays [sic], atheists, secularists - the number would be small and assimilable. These would be genuine refugees, worthy of help & not a threat to Europe's homogeneity and cult7ure. But this would involve a now dirty word - 'discrimination' (aka discernment). The new definition of 'equality' is blind to the only diversity that matters - the difference between the deserving and the un-deserving, because that would involve making judgements & the liberal mindset must, above all, not be 'judgemental'." [comment at source].

"Recently the media has been playing on our heart strings telling us we need to let even more Muslim 'refugees' and immigrants into our country. Funny how it's rarely Christian, Hindu or Buddhist refugees that we're accepting - you know, the people who actually are being persecuted in many countries" [source].

"Today Christians who are being persecuted in a barbaric fashion in Syria deserve Christian countries ... to act fast to help them" [Polish Prime Minister Ewa Kopacz, quoted at: source].

"Where are the genuine refugees, the Iraqi and Syrian Christians at risk of murder by Isil? When did we last see a Christian refugee family featured in the media? Or do Syrian Christian women wear the hijab? If we had not imported 8 million unnecessary immigrants already, we would have plenty of room for terrorised Christians. That would be the truly humanitarian response: rigorously screen the migrants, accept only the Christians (the policy adopted by Cyprus) and send the Muslims to the rich Islamic states such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar, who are not known to have taken in a single refugee. If Shiite Muslims are in danger from Isil, let Iran admit its co-religionists" [source].

"Christians in the Middle East have been crucified, beheaded, raped, forcibly converted and ethnically cleansed. Yet our government has so far refused requests to grant asylum to Christians trying to flee Iraq and Syria. With few exceptions such as Poland and the Czech Republic, Europe's Christian countries are shunning Christian refugees from Islamist terror while opening their borders to hundreds of thousands of Muslims. Hungary's prime minister, Viktor Orban, has said Europe should only let in Christians. For that, he has been denounced as a Nazi. But this lemming-like attitude will itself ensure that the spectre of fascism in Europe becomes a reality" [source].

"Almost all of the migrants flooding into Europe are Muslims. Most of the Christians have been hiding in churches and homes in the Middle East, afraid to venture to the UN refugee camps which tend to be managed by Muslims. ... David Miliband, CEO of the New York City-based IRC, demanded ... that the U.S. accept 65,000 Syrian refugees by the end of President Obama's term in office. Miliband's organization made no mention of the persecuted Christians in Syria" [source].

"[T]he frustration for those of us who have been calling for compassion for Syrian victims for many months is that the Christian community is yet again left at the bottom of the heap. ... Mr Cameron's policy inadvertently discriminates against the very Christian communities most victimised by the inhuman butchers of the so-called Islamic State. Christians are not to be found in the UN camps, because they have been attacked and targeted by Islamists and driven from them. They are seeking refuge in private homes, church buildings and with neighbours and family" [source].

"[Christians] are the most vulnerable and repeatedly targeted victims of this conflict. Indeed, a Hundred years after the Armenian and Assyrian genocide, in which over a million Christians are estimated to have been killed by Ottoman Muslims, the same is happening today in the form of an ethnic cleansing of Christians in the region. Christians have been crucified, beheaded, raped, and subjected to forced conversion. The so-called Islamic State and other radical groups are openly glorifying the slaughter of Christians" [source].

"Britain should make Syrian Christians a priority because they are a particularly vulnerable group. Furthermore, we are a Christian nation with an established Church so Syrian Christians will find no challenge to integration. The churches are already well-prepared and eager to offer support and accommodation to those escaping the conflict" [source].

"[T]he Muslim world is exporting its instability to Europe, via a mass exodus of people. What can [we] do? There is nothing we can do about the ancient Sunni-Shia schism, but we can protect those who have become collateral damage - Christians. ... For the past 20 years Christians have been ethnically cleansed across much of the Middle East as part of the rise of Muslim militancy. In Syria, before the civil war, more than 1 million Syrian Christians lived in security and were better educated than the general population. That number has been decimated. In Iraq, the number of Christians has plunged from 1.4 million to about 250,000 over the past 40 years, displaced by waves of civil war, invasion and ethnic cleansing. Most Christians who remain live in the Kurdish-controlled area. Another 300,000 Christians live under the Islamic theocracy of Iran. Most are ethnically Armenian or Assyrian. Would it be a breach of our discrimination laws to prioritise Christians are refugees? No. I've checked. About 1 million Arab Christians are currently displaced and have no chance of returning to safety and normalcy in their own countries. Unlike displaced Muslims they have no diaspora in the region to absorb them" [source].

"There are Christians and non-Muslim minorities who are genuine refugees, but the two Muslim sects whose militias are murdering each other are not victims, they are perpetrators. Just because Sunnis are running from a Shiite militia or Shiites from a Sunni militia right now doesn't make them victims. The moment that their side's militia wins and begins slaughtering the other side, the oppressed will become the oppressors. Such shifts have already taken place countless times in this conflict. The refugees aren't fleeing a dictator, they're fleeing each other while carrying the hateful ideologies that caused this bloodshed with them. ... Muslim migrants are murdering Christian refugees on the journey over. And this is only the beginning. ... Slovakia has announced that it ill only take in Christian refugees and that's the right thing to do. Christians are the real victims of this Muslim conflict. The vast majority of the refugees, many of whom aren't even Syrians, aren't. The rest of Europe should use Slovakia's refugee policy as a model" [source].

"Are Syrians being moved to the front of the line among the millions of displaced persons across the globe? Why? Why are they more deserving than Africans fleeing tribal butchery, Coptic Christians driven from their homes in Egypt and Libya, Ukrainians fleeing Russian Reconquista, or Venezuelans escaping Marxist militarism?" [source].

"The REAL refugees of ISIS (Christians) are being denied access in Western countries (except Poland), while Muslim Jihadis are mixing into secular Muslim populations that are pouring into Western nations" [source].

"First thing is to find the Christian refugees, get them out before they arte slaughtered by the 99% muslims. Bring them to the UK as a priority. This can easily be justified as the first and easiest step in processing the remainder. These people have been systematically [eradicated] by the muslim hordes in a genocide against christians. A couple of simple questions to identify them as non-muslim Christian Syrian refugees: (1) Do you believe Jesus is the Son of God? (2) Was Jesus crucified, did he die on a cross and was he resurrected? (3) Was Abu al-Qasim Muhammad ibn 'Abd Allah ibn 'Abd al-Muttalib ibn Hashim a rapist and a murderer? 2 out of  3 correct answers will suffice"   /   "Don't forget many muslims are converting to Christianity to get into Europe. Also, as Christians, they are less likely to be deported to a muslim country (apostasy = death) although they will, of course, secretly convert back to Islam once papers are given over" [comments at: source].  [EMcD: As this second comment suggests, Westerners need to familiarise themselves with the Islamic doctrine of Taqiyya: 'Permissible Lying' which is an aspect of Sharia especially authorised for use with unbelievers in order to further the spread of Islam into the Dar-al-Harb (the House of War; i.e. non-Muslim nations).]

"Sweden: Iraqi Christians are being systematically expelled back to Iraq (and certain death) by the Swedish government. The United States: Assyrian Christian refugees have been denied Visas by the US State Dept., while thousands of Muslims (non-refugees) are accepted. Only one nation, having tasted the cruelty of a totalitarian system has opened wide its borders to Christian refugees: that sanctuary is Poland. May the rest of the West find the mercy and compassion of the Polish people towards Christian victims of Muslim persecution. And may we do it before we stain our souls again with the blood of innocents. A stain that may NEVER be removed" [source].

"These people that the Liberals brought here are just voters for the Liberals. Meanwhile Christians are being crucified, burned alive, beheaded, raped, shot, cut to pieces, and being subjected to about as many horrors that you can think of. Trudeau and the Liberals have turned their backs on those who most desperately need our help. Choosing instead at cherry picking those that will most likely vote Liberal instead. ... Clearly they are NOT refugees, and never were, and Canada will have a black eye internationally speaking for ignoring those that truly need help. Choosing instead to bring affluent voters for the Liberals to this country. All thanks to that heartless and ignorant Trudeau and the Liberals"   /   "Won't Trudeau be red in the face when the immigrants he is rushing in end up voting for the Sharia Law Party instead of him" [comments at source].

The Eradication of Christianity in the West

"Those arriving have been raised in another religion and represent a radically different culture. Most of them are not Christians, but Muslims. This is an important question because Europe and European identity is rooted in Christianity. Is it not worrying in itself that European Christianity is now barely able to keep Europe Christian? If we lose sight of this, the idea of Europe could become a minority interest in its own continent. There is no alternative, and we have no option but to defend our borders" [source].

"To defend Christianity today is to violate the ultimate taboo of the Brussels multiculturalists and the forces of political correctness that promote mass immigration for precisely the objective of eradicating Europe's Christian identity. [Viktor] Orban [PM of Hungary] and his Fidesz party have long been a target for demonisation by the cultural Marxist left, ever since it gave Hungary an admirable new constitution. When Hillary Clinton, the New York Times, the United Nations and the Brussels kleptocracy all denounce a nation, it is a clear sign that it is doing something good" [source].

"So, the transformation of this country by mass migration, begun by New Labour to rub the Right's nose in diversity, has now moved up a gear. One in eight of us was born abroad - and how long before that's one in six, then one in four? These people are not (as I am) the children of British subjects born while overseas. They are people who have grown up in a different culture. Never before in our history have we faced the task of integrating a minority so large. Never before have we had such a feeble idea of what being British is. And yet people ask me, as if the idea were absurd, why I think this will be a Muslim country within a couple of generations. I can think of no force or idea or movement or faith more likely to prosper in the state to come. Like all other civilisations which lost their nerve and the will to live, European Christianity is destined to become a minority in its own territory. By the way, if you don't like this, and voted Tory at the last Election, you have no business complaining. I told you repeatedly that the Tory concern about immigration was faked. They don't want the power to stop it" [Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 30 August 2015].

"I've come to the conclusion that some people are so bent on destroying Christianity that they will even choose the most illogical and dangerous ideas to justify it" [source].

"And still, Europe, like a Japanese mother taking her brood with her as she suicides by drowning, is deliberately entering a roiling tide, firmly grasping her children. The difference between the two is that Europe lies, and is so perverse in her deed that she cares more about alien children than she cares about her own that she is about to drown. America, competing for 'progressive' creds with Europe, watches the advancing wall of water with yearning and curses the Gun Nuts, Bible Freaks and White 'Racists' who still hamper her with fraying cords" [source].

"And from the ritual rape, 'Eurabia' shall be born, with 'Chrislam' as its religion. In Cultural Marxist Sweden, the Church is already collecting money for the establishment of mosques, and staying busy by taking down the crosses. The Bishop of Stockholm's diocese, who ordered the crosses to be removed, is none other than the Lesbian Feminist Eva Brunne. That Cultural Marxism has infiltrated and taken over is apparent, from secular Lutheran parishes to the Vatican itself - which for hundreds of years has engaged in occult non-Christian activity" [source].

"If Europeans don't take action at once - Germany and Europe will be Islamic Caliphates. Germans and Europeans will be converted to Islam, large scale genocide of Europeans will take place - Europeans who don't want to convert - white girls and women will be taken by Islamic invaders, Europeans and Germans will try to escape as refugees to Eastern and Southern Europe and Russia, until Europeans stop Muslim immigrations and deport all immigrant invaders who are already come in on Hijrah to Europe" [comment at source].

The Battle of Vienna and the Betrayal of Our Nations

"For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?"  (The Holy Bible, Matthew 16:26)

"There will come a tipping point (if not already reached) where we cannot row back the self-inflicted damage, but we will be hit with the realisation of what we have done. The deep breath before the plunge. Like standing on the beach, marvelling at the low tide and the exposed stones and floundering fish, then the awful realisation of seeing the horizon RISE, then knowing a tsunami is on its way and even with minutes to spare, we are hit with the powerlessness of our situation. That time will come. The only thing that will give us hope of turning it around (and preventing much worse to come) - is a series of SEVERE shocks to the system that no amount of Leftist apologism can make up for, nor the media suppress. Then the tsunami will the THE PEOPLE - a mass awakening that the Elites who brought this on us cannot avoid, cannot hide from, and CAN NEVER RECOVER FROM" (emphases in original) [comment at source].

"Merkel looks more and more like the posthumous revenge of the GDR. It is the former communist state with its cadre schools where she has learned her trade. We've all been deluded in thinking it was dead and the evil spirit that inhabited it along with it. The way this woman talks and acts now is precisely consistent with this part of our past: A state which, despite calling itself 'democratic', has utter contempt for its constituents, disregards their opinions and choices and decides everything over their heads, only needs them as workhorses who, in the end, are interchangeable commodities. What they don't know is that they can't control Islam in the same way. We can rid ourselves of such a cynical regime as we've done before, but not any longer when we ourselves are gone. One wonders if they're speculating on that, not knowing that they're creating their own demise" [comment at source].

"This project will require the unending expansion of the State government into all areas of communal life as they have set up a situation of continual, never-ending conflict, until people resign themselves in despair to their new status ... It is not surprising that it is the Eastern European nations who see the writing on the wall. Their experience under Communist tyranny is still within living memory" [comment at source].

"These politicians are owed nothing any more neither are we obliged to obey them anymore. They have betrayed us and future generations. They are duty bound to defend and protect but instead they have liberally attacked and intentionally destroyed this country and its people. These are crimes. They are criminals as are their feckless supporters. Traitors one and all" [comment at source].

"If Trump's proposals are 'extreme' then how exactly would you categorise the current do-nothing policies being championed by the most of the Western world's political leaders from Barak Obama to David Cameron and Angela Merkel? I'd suggest that policies which involve imposing tens of thousands of displaced citizens from Islamist [sic] hellholes like Syria and Libya on the reluctant populaces and creaking welfare systems of Western liberal democracies are about as extreme as you can get. They are, in fact, a form of tyranny" [source].

"You impose tolerance and diversity but you mean self-hatred, self-denial, and self-abolishment. You love and support the foreign and hate and fight what is our own. You want to talk us into believing that we have no identity, that we are too homogenous. We shall be repressed and replaced. You preach of the diversity of cultures yet you destroy them" [source].

"The old expression, 'the genie is out of the bottle', comes from Arabic folklore, surrounding the devilish character known as the 'Jinn' [EMcD: the biblical Satan] who grants wishes in exchange for the soul of the seeker. Western leaders have let the 'jinn' out of the bottle, and like Pandora's box, the resulting chaos will not be contained" [source].

"In the First Century, 'the Moors' - Muslims of antiquity - invaded and nearly conquered the entire European continent (Spain, France, Greece, Turkey, etc). It was only the strength of Christianity and the unity this inspired, which turned back the scourge of Islamic imperialism in Europe. The world of today is very similar, but with one key difference. Europe, and less so America, now exist in a moral and religious vacuum. There is no concrete ideology or religious paradigm posing a credible challenge to the radical adherents of Islam. Islam is now controlling most of Europe, either actively, or passively, due to the absence of any response from local governing authorities - a curious void of law and order. ... Unless Europeans and Americans rise up now to reverse this trend, one of two things will occur. Either those in power will succeed in using this crisis to advance their aims and fundamentally transform their societies, or, more likely, Islam will become dominant in the West past the point of no return" [source].

"The policy of encouraging mass migration feels like an attempt by the EU - with the BBC's wholehearted support - to punish the indigenous peoples of Europe for disappointing them. Here, our left-liberal elite lost faith in us in the '80s, when, unforgivably, we kept on voting for Mrs. Thatcher.  In particular, the working and lower-middle classes have proved a sad disappointment, with their refusal to embrace socialism, or to give a stuff about feminists, gays [sic], the transgender community, nuclear disarmament, immigration, multiculturalism, foreign aid, political correctness - or the EU itself. Despite decades of propaganda from the BBC, the lower orders have proved obdurate when it comes to signing up to the Great Progressive Programme: pride in the flag, the military, and the monarchy and a propensity to celebrate our national differences are, if anything, increasing. The indigenous working classes - here and in many parts of Europe - have proved themselves unworthy of the compassion of their enlightened overlords; now, the elites seem determined to replace them in a sort of endlessly prolonged punishment beating. (It never occurs to the BBC or the EU that perhaps it's their attitudes which need to change, rather than those of the tax-payers who fund them.)" [source].

"The cultural cancer that Islam represents for Europe is ultimately only one (of many) tools used by the Elite to break the indigenous body and spirit, ... The retarded outlook on life which Allah's most pious represent, with its totalitarian collectivist mentality, is in perfect goose-step with Communist ideology, which in turn equates to total oppression. That is what's actually being imported" [source].

"The Muslim invasion of Europe is planned. To believe otherwise is naive, considering how the Elite openly discuss their vision. Goldman Sachs' chairman [Peter] Sutherland, who also has represented the United Nations on the migration issue, has stated that the EU must do everything to undermine national homogeneity. Monopoly man and billionaire George Soros has expressed similar wishes, that Europe should accept at least a million migrants annually. Both are members of the Bilderberg Group. Add to this that the EWU has opened job centers in Africa, with the intention to import fifty million Africans to Europe" [source].

"Princess Europa was Phoenician, according to legend, which means that Zeus therefore must have kidnapped her to Crete from the area of present-day Lebanon and Syria. It was the war in Syria, created by decree of the Elite, which gave the entire Third World their excuse to invade Europe - assisted with detailed maps, which appeared as mysteriously as the Twitter campaign 'Refugees Welcome', and which guided them en masse along the best routes into Europe... One of these was to the Greek Islands, therein Crete. The Rape of Europe is a fact, and what awaits the indigenous European peoples is nothing sort of an archetypal struggle of epic proportions" [source].

"The leaders and influential elites of the European nations have signed up to [Replacement Migration] in full. The eradication of native Europeans seems to be just good business to these people. One only has to look back at when then French President Nikolas Sarkozy said on television that 'miscegenation is the duty' of Europe, and if people did not breed with non-native immigrants willingly then 'the state will have to move in with more coercive methods'.  Similarly, influential British journalist Andrew Marr wrote in a piece for the Guardian back in the late 1990s that the answer to all [our] problems is 'vigorous miscegenation' and that 'state repression' is required" [source].

"One question that never gets asked is why do the elites of the west see replacement migration as the only option? After all, birth rates are only low in Northern European nations thanks to Marxist social engineering policies. Why can the state not implement measures to encourage native families to have more children?  Why can the state not bring in measures to increase productivity and therefore tax revenue in the nations in question?  Why is it that the only option they wish to pursue is the total destruction of the ethnic and cultural order of Europe?" [source].

"I was watching Merkel as Trump talked about radical Islam, she was shaking her head, she won't hear a word said against Islam. That's in spite of the invasion, the thousands of brutal gang rapes, the Female Genital Mutilation, the crime, violence and killing" [comment at source].

The Wise Men

"It seems that people who survived decades under communism are less susceptible to the tyranny of political correctness. An alliance known as the Visegrád Group was formed in Central Europe after the fall of the Iron Curtain and is currently led by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán of Hungary, President Miloš Zeman of the Czech Republic, and Prime Minister Robert Fico of Slovakia. Not only do these countries allow dissent on the issue of Islam, their political leaders are among the foremost Islam-critics - what they say into the microphones in their state broadcasting studios is the same thing that prompted the prosecution of Geert Wilders, Tommy Robinson, and myself. Nowadays, those former communist dictatorships host the freest speech in Europe. ... The future of Europe may depend on these stalwart patriots behind what used to be the Iron Curtain. They are leading the way - showing the cowardly political leaders of Western Europe how these things could and should be done" [source].

Global Governance: The Tower of Babel

"No matter what their motives are, the internationalists who push for global governance and a borderless world are expending vast amounts of money to fool the European public and move millions of Muslim immigrants into Western Europe. Europe will become more diverse whether it likes it or not. And if, as a consequence, terror attacks have to kill hundreds or thousands of people, and women have to be gang-raped, why, those are just unfortunate side-effects. You can't make an omelet[te] without breaking eggs, you know. Especially white European eggs" [source].

"The traditional cultures and nations of Europe are being deliberately deconstructed so that a borderless society with no national identities can be constructed on top of the ruins. And a borderless Europe is simply a precursor to a borderless global society. This future entity is commonly referred to as the 'New World Order' or 'global governance', and it is intended to be an unaccountable worldwide system of management and control modeled ion the United Nations. A totalitarian behemoth - to paraphrase what George Orwell said: 'If you want a vision of the globalist future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever'." [source].

"Tragically, fear has gripped the nations who have been brainwashed to the point of no return and a sense of helplessness through lack of wise leadership over very many decades. I personally see either the European Civil War ... or ... the culmination of all of this Satanic political/religious movement in the emergence of the Anti-Christ. It happened only a generation ago with Hitler, an anti-Christ with a small 'a', emerging at a time of chaos and for a time, sweeping all before him in his evil ambitions. The time of crisis and chaos will likely be exacerbated by a massive collapse of world economies and finance. The ideal time for a counterfeit saviour to emerge on to the world stage. It's all in the Word of God, The Bible, on which our western systems used to be be based. I urge everyone to read it" [comment at source].

Some Facts and Figures

The Refugee Camps

"72% are adult men, while just 13% are women, and 15% are children, the UN has calculated, based on reports from governments and the media" [quoted at source, as at 25:09:2015].

Mediterranean Crossings

"The number of migrants attempting the dangerous crossing has soared in the past two years, from about 22,000 in 2013 to about 380,000 so far this year. Of the more than 300,000 who have tried to cross the Mediterranean in 2015, the UN reports 2,850 are dead or missing" [quoted at source, as at 09:09:2015].

Demographic

"Most of [the migrants] are from Syria (53%) and Afghanistan (14%), as well as Eritrea (7%), Nigeria (3%) and Pakistan (3%)" [quoted at source, as at 09:09:2015].

The Silk Muzzle

The following is an extract from the speech given on 15 March 2016 by Hungarian PM, Viktor Orbán: The Time Has Come for Opposition and Resistance

"Ladies and Gentlemen, Europe is not free. Because freedom begins with speaking the truth. Even if it is made of silk, a muzzle is still a muzzle.

It is forbidden to say that those arriving are not refugees, but that Europe is threatened by migration. It is forbidden to say that tens of millions are ready to set out in our direction. it is forbidden to say that immigration brings crime and terror to our countries. It is forbidden to point out that the masses arriving from other civilisations endanger our way of life, our culture, our customs, and our Christian traditions. It is forbidden to point out that those who arrived earlier have already built up their own new, separate world for themselves, with its own laws and ideals, which is forcing apart the thousand-year-old structure of Europe. It is forbidden to point out that this is not an accidental and unintentional chain of consequences, but a pre-planned and orchestrated operation; a mass of people directed toward us.

It is forbidden to say that in Brussels they are concocting schemes to transport foreigners here as quickly as possible and to settle them here among us. It is forbidden to point out that the purpose of settling people here is to reshape the religious and cultural landscape of Europe, and to reengineer its ethnic foundations - thereby eliminating the last barrier to internationalism: the nation-states. It is forbidden to say that Brussels is now stealthily devouring more and more slices of our national sovereignty, and that in Brussels many are now making a plan for a United States of Europe - for which no-one has ever given authorisation. ...

At last the peoples of Europe, who have been slumbering in abundance and prosperity, have understood that the principles of life that Europe has been built on are in mortal danger. Europe is the community of Christian, free, and independent nations; ... Mass migration ... is masquerading as a humanitarian cause, but its true nature is the occupation of territory. ... We shall not allow [Brussels] to force upon us the bitter fruit of its cosmopolitan immigration policy. We shall not import to Hungary crime, terrorism, homophobia and synagogue-burning anti-Semitism. There shall be no urban districts beyond the reach of law, there shall be no mass disorder, no immigrant riots here, and there shall be no gangs hunting down our women and daughters. We shall not allow others to tell us whom we can let into our home and country, whom we will live alongside, and with whom we will share our country. ... we reject the forced resettlement scheme, and we shall tolerate neither blackmail, nor threats.

The time has come to ring the warning bell. The time has come for opposition and resistance. The time has come to gather allies to us. The time has come to raise the flag of proud nations. The time has come to prevent the destruction of Europe, and to save the future of Europe. ... hidden, faceless world powers will eliminate everything that is unique, autonomous, age-old and national. They will blend cultures, religions and populations ... And if we resign ourselves to this outcome, our fate will be sealed, and we will be swallowed up in the enormous belly of the United States of Europe. ...

The task which awaits [us] is to defeat, rewrite and transform the fate intended for us ... if [we] are brave enough. We must therefore drag the ancient virtue of courage out from under the silt of oblivion. First of all we must put steel in our spines, and we must answer clearly, with a voice loud enough to be heard far and wide, the foremost, the single most important question determining our fate:  'Shall we be slaves or men set free?' - that is the question, answer me!"

Malsi-Tung

The following is an extended extract from the blog article: What is Malsi-Tung?

"The nature of this mentality is very difficult to pin down. It is the product of many different social currents: liberalism; social liberalism; socialism; Christianity in its more non-conformist manifestations; Marxism; Progressivism; Political Correctness. People are committed in varying degrees to the features of this mentality ... they will tend to be suspicious of patriotic sentiments, seeing these as a way of excluding outsiders ... they will tend to be very solicitous of the needs of immigrants and minorities; they will tend to take the side of 'the other' rather than straightforwardly supporting the 'home team'; they will tend to be less suspicious of foreign powers and assume that all people are fundamentally motivated by the same generosity of spirit as themselves ... readily amalgamated with self-guilt and cultural self-denunciation. ...

"This utopian and naive mentality is now opening the gates of the city, metaphorically speaking, to the forces of Islam, a long-standing, powerful, relentless, and poorly understood social movement of enormous brutality. Deaf to the cries of those who know more about this movement, the details of its ideology and its historical record, they seek to silence these voices as the remnants of an out-dated, backward-looking mentality of bigotry and distrust. Simply be nicer to everyone and all will be well, they say.

"Malsi-Tung is the name I use to denote the interweaving of ... on the one hand Islam, which has well-documented, historically proven, and theologically grounded aspirations for global domination under Sharia; and Left/Liberal/Progressivism, a difficult-to-name and hard-to-classify set of beliefs, attitudes, assumptions, values and prejudices which are forming a deadly embrace with the wholly antithetical culture of Islam. These two forces ... are driving the world towards a new dark age characterised by things which the Liberal/Progressive world claims endlessly to be against, but against which apparently it is unwilling to offer any resistance, indeed it seems destined to hasten their progress. ...

"There is no word for this mentality so I have called it malsi-tung. Those afflicted with it I refer to as Malisites.

"The most despicable aspect of Malisites today is their pre-emptive surrender to Islam, a phenomenon they do not even bother to subject to serious enquiry. Basing their views on utopian assumptions instead of well-documented facts, they do everything in their power to smooth the path for this alien and cruel culture. If we do manage to avoid the descent into a New Islamic Dark Age, the part played by the Malisites will forever be remembered as one of the vilest in history"

[End of Extract]

Angela Merkel

The following is a reader's comment on the following article: Put Merkel in a Straitjacket

"Like her infamous countryman Hitler [Angela Merkel] has united with the Muslims and the far left against her own citizens in general, against Jews, Christians, and patriots in particular.  And in the process she will destroy Europe.

"In the Second World War Hitler and the Mufti of Jerusalem bonded over a shared virulent and irrational hatred of Jews.  The Mufti was impressed by the way that Hitler blamed every ill that had befallen humanity since the world began, on Jews.  The Mufti accordingly sent entire Muslim regiments to fight alongside and under the command of the Nazi Schutzstaffel regiments.  No doubt the Mufti of Jerusalem planned ultimately to wipe out all infidels including Hitler and his supporters, once the Jews had been exterminated.

"And today history repeats itself.  Today we have a mad German Chancellor making common cause with the same people Hitler did (the Muslims and the far left).  And once the Jews and the Christians, the atheists, the agnostics and the patriots have been wiped out Merkel and the other useful idiots will be eliminated in turn.  For by then Merkel and her cronies will have outlived their usefulness.  But it will be too late for the infidels.  Because Merkel the mad traitor will have delivered Europe into the hands of a murderous oppressive totalitarian, misogynistic Muslim theocracy."

Some Cold Hard Facts

The following is a viewer's comment on the YouTube: UN Migration Deal

"Here [are] some cold hard facts that globalists, and their supporters, don't want to face:

• Migration IS NOT and never will be a human right;
• Forcing people to accept other invaders' cultures won't work in the long run;
• Stifling freedom of speech or having overall censorship will only fuel populism/nationalism;
• Giving special privileges to immigrants will only serve to foster civil unrest and distrust/hatred of immigrants, especially those of Islamic descent, all the while the natives in their respective countries get next to nothing;
• Communism/Socialism (aka Globalism) or any form of Totalitarianism almost always fails. History has shown us this much (which also explains why the Left are trying to change or completely erase the past) which leads us to:
• Attempting to change or to erase the past won't work and will only lead to societies making the same mistakes over again;
• The sheer disdain of the Elite/Bourgeoisie for the average working classes will also fuel civil unrest;
• Even if all this comes to pass, it won't last... Many people, no matter how slowly, are waking up and no matter how insidious the MSM is, one way or another even the 'normies' will eventually realise what's going on. You can't hide something like this forever, especially in the age of the Internet (which is just one reason why the EU wants to censor it) ...

"I sincerely believe that the globalists will not win. It may sound naïve or perhaps a tad optimistic, but I don't wish to fall prey to despair. Good always triumphs in the end no matter how long it takes."

Identity Politics

"There is absolutely no difference between [Islam and European Fascist-Marxism]. ... European culture has been gutted by Post-Modern 'victim'-obsessed PC indoctrination which has already warped the minds of the young" [comment at: source].

The following is an extended extract from the article: The Origin of 'Identity Politics' & 'Political Correctness'

"Identity politics (sometimes dubbed 'political correctness') is the result of a political-Left major backlash against the mass of ordinary people (in Europe and 'the West'), beginning in the 1920s/30s, in the wake of the persistent failure of Marxist theory to be realised in European 'revolution' or any real change through democracy. In shifting the blame away from Marxist theory and those gullible enough to adhere to it, and on to those the theory had prescribed and predicted would have been the beneficiaries, if only they had responded accordingly ('the [white, male] workers'); then the cognitive-dissonance within the political-left mindset caused by this crisis to an extent was salved"

"As with any fervent ideology, a hallmark of the political-Left is interpreting anything and everything in its own ideological terms to claim as a manifestation of the ideology and its prophecy - jumping on a bandwagon, so to speak; though here only to hijack it. The bandwagon here was, of course, the American civil rights movement, which though enjoying ubiquitous support within black communities - to the point often of various forms of extremism - featured virtually nil endorsement of socialism ... It is from the time of this co-option that 'identity politics' dates; many considering that the movement was incorporated into the Left in the wake of King's assassination in 1968 - the major turning-point year in political-Left politics generally"

"'Civil rights', as the first great 'single-issue' campaign, served not least to provide an acceptable cloak for the Left to avoid provoking a resurgence of McCarthysim. The major social upheaval of 'civil rights' with its large-scale and widespread rioting was easily the nearest thing in then recent US history to look like the promised Marxist 'revolution', and obviously was just the practical application the 'theory' was seeking. Moreover, the protagonists (black Americans) were eminently separable form the now despised 'workers' per se, in being presentable as a new 'group; from outside of the former fray of 'boss' versus 'worker'."

"This accident of history served to add 'black' to 'woman' as 'the new oppressed' ... 'The worker' in effect was retrospectively stereotyped as both 'man' and 'white'. With the inverse of this stereotype of 'white' being not just 'black American' but 'black' - that is, ethnic-minority generically ... so it was that the new 'agents of social change' / 'disadvantaged' / 'oppressed' were extended from women to also include all ethnic minorities"

"It is only with the knowledge of how this developed that sense can be made of why ethnicity is held above the myriad other possible differences that could be utilised as in-group markers, when in fact there is nothing inherent in ethnicity as an in-group marker to produce inter-group prejudice that is particularly more pernicious"

"Indeed, the worst inter-communal conflicts nominally between different ethnicities usually are between different cultural heritages with no discernible 'racial' differences of any kind - and what (non-ethnic) differences there are can be minimal; the lack of contrast actually fuelling the intensity of conflict, such is the need for groups to feel distinguished from each other"

"Furthermore, ethnic prejudice is anything but restricted to or even predominantly 'white' on 'black': inter-ethnic (eg, 'black' on Asian) and ethnic-on-'white' 'racism' can be, often is and may usually be the greater problem; and a negative attitude to a certain ethnicity does not imply a similar attitude to other ethnicities"

"The specific US experience, given the highly divisive politics in the wake of the American Civil War over the basis of the Southern US economy in African slavery, does not translate to elsewhere; notably not to Europe - as was starkly evidenced in the experience of World War II 'black' American GIs stationed in England in how they were favourably received by locals, who sided with them when discriminated against"

"'Racial divides' in European 'white' host countries are the result not of mutual antipathy but affiliative forces, principally within migrant enclaves and secondarily within the 'host' community; in both cases being through in-group 'love', not out-group 'hate'"

[EMcD: though the latter part of this observation is indeed true in normal circumstances, this does not, of course, take account of the Islamic/Koranic doctrines of Al-Hijra (Immigration), Taqiyya (Lying and Deceit), and Razzia/Ghazwa (Rape and Slavery), Dawa (Cultural and Stealth Jihad), and Terrorist and Violent Jihad, carried out by fundamentalist Muslims as they settle in increasing numbers in Western countries with the sole and deliberate purpose of making every remaining Dar al-Harb ('house of war': i.e. any non-Muslim country) into a Dar al-Islam ('house of submission': i.e all Muslim countries) until Islam finally achieves its longed-for global Caliphate.]

[End of Extract]

The Burden Which Habakkuk the Prophet Saw:

The righteous cry out for God's punishment of the injustice in their lands:
O LORD, how long shall I cry, and thou wilt not hear! even cry out unto thee of violence, and thou wilt not save!
Why dost thou show me iniquity, and cause me to behold grievance? for spoiling and violence are before me: and there are that raise up strife and contention.
Therefore the law is slacked, and judgment doth never go forth: for the wicked doth compass about the righteous; therefore wrong judgment proceedeth.

The LORD God answers:
Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you.
For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwelling places that are not theirs.
They are terrible and dreadful: their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves.
Their horses also are swifter than the leopards, and are more fierce than the evening wolves:
And their horsemen shall spread themselves, and their horsemen shall come from far; they shall fly as the eagle that hasteth to eat.
They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.
And they shall scoff at the kings, and the princes shall be a scorn unto them: they shall deride every strong hold; for they shall heap dust, and take it.
Then shall his mind change, and he shall pass over, and offend, imputing this his power unto his god.

The dismay of the righteous at God's answer:   
Art thou not from everlasting, O LORD my God, mine Holy One? we shall not die.
O LORD, thou hast ordained them for judgment; and, O mighty God, thou hast established them for correction.
Thou art of purer eyes than to behold evil, and canst not look on iniquity:
Wherefore lookest thou upon them that deal treacherously, and holdest thy tongue when the wicked devoureth the man that is more righteous than he?
They take up all of them with the angle, they catch them in their net, and gather them in their drag: therefore they rejoice and are glad.
Therefore they sacrifice unto their net, and burn incense unto their drag; because by them their portion is fat, and their meat plenteous.
Shall they therefore empty their net, and not spare continually to slay the nations?
I will stand upon my watch, and set me upon the tower, and will watch to see what he will say unto me, and what I shall answer when I am reproved.

The LORD God's reassurance to the righteous:
And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.
For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry.
Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith

[Habakkuk 1:1-2:4]

The Frankfurt School

"The Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution.

Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the 'oppressive' order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus - 'continuing the work of Western Marxists by other means' as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their 'quiet' cultural revolution ... the [Frankfurt] School recommended (among other things):

(1) the creation of racism offences,
(2) continual change to create confusion,
(3) the teaching of sex and homosexuality to children,
(4) the undermining of schools' and teachers' authority,
(5) huge immigration to destroy identity,
(6) the promotion of excessive drinking,
(7) emptying of churches,
(8) an unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime,
(9) dependency on the state or state benefits,
(10) control and dumbing down of media,
(11) encouraging the breakdown of the family.

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism' - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

(a) attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children,
(b) abolish differences in the education of boys and girls,
(c) abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces,
(d) declare women to be an 'oppressed class' and men as 'oppressors'."

"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"
(Isaiah 5:20-21)

"Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together,
against the LORD, and against His anointed, saying:
'Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.'
He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD shall have them in derision"
(Psalm 21:1-4)

"Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried;
but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand;
but the wise shall understand"
(Daniel 12:10)

© Bayith Ministries     http://www.bayith.org     bayith@blueyonder.co.uk