|
"Juergen Habermas, a
veteran leftist German philosopher stunned his admirers not long ago
by proclaiming, 'Christianity, and nothing else, is the ultimate
foundation of liberty, conscience, human rights, and democracy, the
benchmarks of Western civilisation. To this day, we have no other
options [than Christianity]. We continue to nourish ourselves from
this source. Everything else is postmodern chatter.'" [http://pcwatch.blogspot.com].
"Our humanistic society
caters to everything that appeals to sinful man and opposes
everything that reflects a holy God. It seeks to eliminate whatever
God says is right. It disparages the Biblical home and declares that
it is no better than immoral arrangements. It is against God's order
in the home. It opposes morality. It violates the sanctity of the
unborn. It negates authority in society. It scoffs at a holy Lord's
Day. It forbids the teaching of the Bible in school. It goes into a
self-righteous, scientific funk at the very mention of the word
creation. If God is for it, our society is against it. As a
result, the society id rushing to its own destruction" [John E.
Ashbrook, Family Fundamentals, p48].
"There are in fact two
wars being waged against the English: one is a war similar in aim
though not as murderous in scope (yet) to that being waged against
the Boers in South Africa and directed, for the time being,
primarily at displacing whites from the large council estates in the
big cities ... or rendering them fragmented, inert and willing to
accept their fate as a racial minority in their ancestral lands. ...
The other war is an ideological being waged among the professions
and by the professions. This war is aimed at the cultural,
political, national, economic and legal destruction of England. The
striking thing about both these wars is that they are not being
prosecuted by the agents and soldiers of an occupying force, as
would have been the case in 1940 had we succumbed to Nazi invasion.
The most active persecutors of the English are not African or
Pakistani immigrants but their fellow Englishmen and Englishwomen:
the police; the social services; a corrupt and cowardly teaching
profession; politicians and whole swathes of business" [Dr. Frank
Ellis,
http://drfrankellis.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/rise-of-new-variant-liberal.html].
"The callousness of
fatherless, comprehensive-educated, Godless, TV-entertained,
computer game-desensitised, cannabis-crazed and lagered-up Britain
is perfectly demonstrated in the pictures of Johnathan Robinson, a
pub landlord whose robbers dragged him from his car, ran him over,
broke his leg and then stamped on his face for fun (since he was, by
then, helpless). Man without conscience is wilder and more dangerous
than any beast. We have bred a generation of concentration camp
guards, and if as a society we later turn to mass murder, nobody
will need to wonder much why and how it happened. I am told the
footprint on his face may help to identify the attacker who, if
convicted, will not suffer anything resembling punishment. It
certainly helps to identify this country as a moral slum" [Peter
Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 02 February 2009].
"One of the most
influential positions in the arts world is quietly up for grabs: the
chairmanship of the Culture Honours committee. Adherence to a
politically correct, modernist view of the world may be compulsory,
if recent evidence is anything to go by. The committee decides which
figures from the arts and media worlds receive knighthoods, damehoods, OBEs and so forth. ... The committee's current chairman
is Lord Stevenson, friend of Peter Mandelson and a disgraced banker
from the Brown years. He also ran the 'People's Peers' fiasco for
Tony Blair. ... The committee's members are straight from Hampstead
central casting. They include Dame Jenny Abramsky (ex-BBC poohbah)
and Dame Liz Forgan (ex-Guardian, ex-Arts Council). ... Also: Leftie
novelist Ben Okri, ex-Arts Council chief Luke Rittner, and Sir Peter
Stothard, who as editor of The Times turned that newspaper into a
Blairite organ. ... Given the committee's bias to the Left, ... it
would be a minor scandal if this job did not go to someone prepared
to question the Guardian view of the world" [Quentin Letts, Daily
Mail, 19 May 2012, p40].
-------------------------------
"The Frankfurt School believed that
as long as an individual had the belief - or even the hope of belief
- that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing
society, then that society would never reach the state of
hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to
provoke socialist revolution.
Their task, therefore, was as
swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do
this they called for the most negative destructive criticism
possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to
de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the
'oppressive' order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a
virus - 'continuing the work of Western Marxists by other means' as
one of their members noted.
To further the advance
of their 'quiet' cultural revolution ... the [Frankfurt] School
recommended (among other things):
(1) the creation of racism
offences,
(2) continual change to create confusion,
(3) the teaching
of sex and homosexuality to children,
(4) the undermining of
schools' and teachers' authority,
(5) huge immigration to destroy
identity,
(6) the promotion of excessive drinking,
(7) emptying of
churches,
(8) an unreliable legal system with bias against victims
of crime,
(9) dependency on the state or state benefits,
(10)
control and dumbing down of media,
(11) encouraging the breakdown of
the family.
One of the main ideas
of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism'
- the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences
between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships
between men and women. To further their aims they would:
(a) attack
the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and
mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary
educators of their children,
(b) abolish differences in the
education of boys and girls,
(c) abolish all forms of male dominance
- hence the presence of women in the armed forces,
(d) declare women
to be an 'oppressed class' and men as 'oppressors'."
"Woe unto them that call evil
good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that
put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"
(Isaiah 5:20-21)
Quotations, Comments, Miscellaneous
Information
Websites and Recommended Materials
|
Scripture References
Education
|
The Front Of It (Chart) |
The Front Of It (Documentation)
Bayith BTR
Articles
|
