Political Correctness Quotations Multiculturalism Immigration Racism

"It is obvious that all the major institutions in Britain have been captured by the liberal/left and are promoting multiculturalism and diversity. What we have witnessed during the post-war period is Gramsci's march through the institutions and it has undoubtedly been very successful" [source].

"The liberal/left are obsessed with multiculturalism, which they promote with a hysterical fervour. In post-Christian Britain it is now the new religion and all dissenters are heretics" [Paul Weston, source].

"It seems to be almost illegal at the moment to attack multiculturalism. And people seem to think that multiculturalism is the same as multiracialism. It isn't. It's the opposite. You can have many ethnic groups, and one culture. In fact, it's the best recipe for harmony. And you can have one ethnic group and two cultures, which is not always a success. This has happened in modern Japan, where ethnic Japanese people who have been living for decades in South America have migrated to their ancestral land. Far from fitting in, they have often been rejected by Japanese-born neighbours, who dislike their funky Brazilian customs and manners" [Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 4 August 2012].

"[M]ulticulturalism transfers the quest for human perfection from the [traditionally Marxist] economic sphere to the social and cultural one, requiring people to give up feelings of tribalism and belonging, and requiring them to prefer 'the other' to the familiar" [Anthony Browne, The Retreat of Reason, p.16].

"The white proponents of multiculturalism are hypocrites. They are, in the main, middle class suburban or rural dwellers of majority white enclaves. One peculiarity of white liberals is that whilst they embrace the ethnic colonisation of the West they are repulsed by the history of white colonisation in the East, thereby showing that their political views have less to do with colonisation per se and more to do with a hatred of Western civilisation. Trying to find a working class man in a gritty and diverse part of town who supports this peculiar ideology is akin to discovering a conservative at the BBC or a democrat in church. Put simply, Western liberals, feminists and homosexuals, who for reasons known only to themselves support multiculturalism, do not choose to live in Riyadh yet hold up Islamic culture as equally valid" [source].

"The non-white proponents of multiculturalism are hypocrites. The Middle East is mono-cultural, as is Pakistan and India. The idea that Europeans in Saudi Arabia can be flogged for practising Christianity whilst Saudi money is financing thousands of radical mosques throughout Europe is perhaps the best example of multiculturalism's rank hypocrisy" [source].

"For years a dangerous myth has surrounded this type of sex crime [sexual abuse of white underage girls by street-grooming gangs]. In this era of political correctness, it is a myth promoted by the police, the BBC, and many media commentators. They insist that the perpetrators come from every ethnicity and not, primarily, from the British Muslim Pakistani community. In fact, almost all of the scores of men convicted of street-grooming schoolgirls for sex - and there have been at least 21 court cases since 1997 - have had exactly this ethnic background" [source]. For more on this issue please see here

"When looking at the picture of the masked man holding the sign which says 'Exterminate those who slander Islam' I thought, now what would be the response if instead someone was to hold a sign which said 'exterminate those who call for the extermination of those who slander Islam.' No doubt a whole other response from the police, media, politicians, judicial system, etc. The experiment of multiculturalism has long ago failed. All cultures and all aspects of the cultures are most definitely not equal, and some are not even in the same epoch, let alone the modern playing field, with some beliefs and practices being outright barbaric and brutal. And it ought to go without saying, although I realize it still does not: that no cultural beliefs and practices which are starkly in destructive contrast to one's own ought to be permitted into any liberal (small 'l' liberal) democratic freedom loving nation, ever. Shed your trappings, or do not be permitted entry" [comment at source].

"And enough of the politically correct language. Political correctness, with its disguises, has more to do with masquerades than the plain truth. And whenever someone says, 'let me be clear', unless she or he then speaks the unadulterated simple and plain truth, they either do not yet sufficiently understand what they are speaking about, are lying, or are not yet free from their indoctrination and habit of using PC speak" [comment at source].

The following is an extended extract from the article by Paul Weston of Liberty GB found here.

"The education- and media-led definition of multiculturalism is that all races and cultures are equal, that immigration enriches us culturally and economically, and, given an atmosphere of mutual tolerance and respect, differing races and religions will benefit one another when intermingled within the same territory. This is the prevailing and generally accepted definition across the West. However, this is not the way it is taught in our schools, nor disseminated by the media. Indigenous children are indoctrinated into the belief that Western civilisation is guilty of historical and present day inequality and oppression - in short, brainwashed into shame about their race and culture. Conversely, ethnic children are both encouraged to take pride in their own race and culture and to feel victimised by the majority white society that they live amongst. This version of multiculturalism is force-fed with a fervour almost religious in its intensity, despite it being a recipe for balkanisation and resentment rather than assimilation.

multiculturalism means a happy-clappy utopian world without borders, where all races and all religions live together in peace and tranquility. That this runs counter to historical precedent, current reality, and the law of nature is of little interest to its proponents, thereby exposing them as either astonishingly uneducated or wilfully ignorant.

the white abasement ideology of multiculturalism is viewed as a weakness prevalent in the governments of the native countries. Not only are they welcomed and subsidised, they are encouraged to keep their own identities and cultures and are the recipients of state-legislated privileges not available to the native whites. It is thus an ideology that can be used to advance their ethnic group self-interests over and above that of the native group. I can only assume that their private discussions must revolve around disbelief and astonishment that any race or culture could prostrate themselves before an aggressor in such a grotesque and effeminate manner.

who wishes to preserve his historical homeland, tradition and culture, multiculturalism takes on a more disturbing aspect. Demographers predict that we will become a minority in our own countries at various points this century, some even before 2050. This means we are being territorially dispossessed, that each and every year we ceded a little more physical ground to the incomers.

When one race invades the homeland of another race it does so in order to acquire territory and to impose its own culture. Conversely, the invaded group resists in order to preserve his race, his territory and his culture, not simply because he is a racist ... Or at least that is historically how things were. ... today ... the incomer makes no pretence of his intentions in his avowal of Islamic mono-cultural superiority . To resist is to be called a racist, yet no one was called a racist in 1939 when we went to war with a different race and culture that wished to enter our homeland, overthrow our elected government, murder the Jews and homosexuals and consign our remaining [subjects] to second-class status. Multiculturalism, when viewed through the conservative prism of racial reality rather than the liberal prism of a multiracial and multi-religious utopia can lead to only one logical conclusion, to wit, Western countries are in the process of unopposed invasion and are submitting in their entirety. Multiculturalism as practised in the West today is an ideology of territorial and political aggression by the anti-Western invader and the submissive ideology of state sanctioned white European appeasement."

The following is an extended extract from the article by Paul Weston of Liberty GB found here.

(1) Mass immigration is undemocratic; (2) Race and minority status are relative; (3) White Europeans internationally are a global minority themselves; (4) Ethnic colonisation and ethnic political advancement operate only in countries with white European majorities; (5) Multi-religious countries have a history of internal violence, the outcomes of which tend toward a reversion to mono-religion after bloody civil wars; (6) Multicultural societies have present day tribal conflict; (7)The white proponents of multiculturalism are hypocrites - they are in the main, middle-class suburban or rural dwellers of majority white enclaves; (8) The non-white proponents of multiculturalism are hypocrites - the Middle East is monocultural, as is Pakistan and India; (9) Multiculturalism's belief that all cultures and races are equal is simply not true; (10) Multiculturalism breeds resentment; (11) Multiculturalism brings with it an increase in violent crime committed at a ratio vastly out of proportion to the ethnic numbers; (12) Multiculturalism promotes dishonesty; (13) Multiculturalism leads to propaganda and brainwashing; (14) Multiculturalism leads to greater government controls; (15) Multiculturalism, if history repeats itself, will lead to a probable - rather than a possible - civil war; (16) Multiculturalism promotes a brain drain from Western nations; (17) Multiculturalism is responsible for the reintroduction to the West of tuberculosis, cholera and malaria, diseases previously though eradicated; (18) Multiculturalism has brought the NHS to its knees; (19) [Importing doctors and nurses] from poor countries is an act of extreme illiberalism; (20) Multiculturalism leads to a lack of cohesion; (21) Multiculturalism is responsible for the reintroduction of slavery, euphemistically entitled 'people trafficking'; (22) Multiculturalism is a betrayal of our fathers and grandfathers who fought and died to preserve their countries and cultures; (23) The Jewish Holocaust was an act of such inhumane savagery that Western Europeans vowed it would never happen again. But multiracialism/multi-religion is responsible for present day holocausts; (24) Multiculturalism betrays the low-income white child; (25) Multiculturalism restricts the freedom of both children and adults - parents refuse to let their children travel into central London and undertake said journeys themselves only if absolutely necessary; (26) Multiculturalism leads to a reduction of standards in our quota-driven institutions; (27) Multiculturalism is a drain on the taxpayer; (28) Multiculturalism claims all faiths are equally valid yet in practice it is distinctly anti-Christian, anti-Semitic and pro-Islamic; (29) Multiculturalism is totalitarian. It brooks no opposition from its detractors and carries out campaigns against perceived heretics with a viciousness previously unknown in Western politics; (30) Multiculturalism is treason."

"One in four people living in Bradford according to the 2011 census was muslim. One in four in Luton. Other cities are not far behind. From the Muslim Council of Britain's website... '33% of the Muslim population was aged 15 years or under in 2011, compared to 19% of the population as a whole.' How long before a British city or town has a majority muslim population?" [comment at source].

"...Poloko Hiri, a Commonwealth citizen with an 'exemplary' record in the British Army, is being ordered out of the UK for committing a single speeding offence. Only Britain's scandalously incompetent immigration system would hound a man with a proud record of service to this country while allowing foreign rapists and killers who should have been deported years ago to walk the streets with impunity" [Daily Mail, 25 August 2012].

"This week's astonishing birth-rate figures, with their frightening implications for schools, housing and public services, are clearly caused by our open borders" [Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 11 August 2013].

"You see, [immigration is] not really all about economics at all. It's not really about immigrants taking jobs which native Brits won't do or the 'pensions gap'. It's really all about undermining - to use [UN's Special Representative for International Migration] Peter Sutherland's own word - our culture and ethnicity. It's all about carrying out a political experiment designed to change the social, political and ethnic landscape of Britain" [source].

"Another classic [argument for mass immigration] is the 'jobs-not-taken-by-Brits' argument. The claim is that there are thousands of jobs which British people simply won't even consider. What is really meant by this is that there are jobs which offer wages which are so low that British people won't accept them. It isn't the case that Brits wouldn't do these jobs no matter what. And why are the wages so low? Because of the masses of immigrants we already have who will happily accept such low wages. (Of course a poor peasant from Pakistan or Bulgaria would do them. But is that a good thing for Britain?) So here we have pro-immigrationists saying that more immigration is a solution to a problem previous immigrants have caused!" [source].

"In the wake of the open door immigration policies deliberately pursued by New Labour, England is now the most crowded country in Europe. By 2015, there will be twice as many people crammed into every square kilometre as in Germany, and four times more than in France. Only three decades from now, unless there is a significant tightening in border controls, there will be almost 495 people living in each square kilometre - compared to only 374 when Labour came to power in 1997. Vince Cable and his colleagues on the Left disgracefully suggest it is somehow racist to worry about immigration. As our revelations show, it has nothing to do with race - and everything to do with how schools, social services, the NHS and housing can possibly be expected to cope with such unprecedented pressure" [Comment, Daily Mail, 28 December 2013].

"That the indigenous British could be a minority by 2066 is the most alarming aspect of this open-border self-immolation. A few public figures may mumble about a lack of school places and hospital beds, but such is the consensus amongst the political class that even a slight breaking of ranks brings obloquy - recall Nigel Farage's 'shameful' suggestion that the British taxpayer not foot the bill for third-world HIV patients who travel here to exploit Britain's international health service. Any discussion of the cultural or demographic consequences of mass immigration garners an even stronger response from the Left than when the debate is restricted solely to resources" [source].

"The manner in which the immigration issue is framed - as a matter of equal rights and the blessings of diversity on one side, versus 'racism' on the other - tends to cut off all rational discourse on the subject. One can only wonder what would happen of the proponents of open immigration allowed the issue to be discussed, not as a moralistic division, but in terms of its real consequences. Instead of saying, 'We believe in the equal and unlimited right of all people to immigrate to ... Britain and enrich our land with their diversity', what if they said, 'We believe in an immigration policy which must result in a staggering increase in our population, a revolution in our culture and way of life, and the gradual submergence of our current population by Muslim and Caribbean and Asian peoples'. Such frankness would open up an honest debate between those who favour a radical change in Britain's ethnic and cultural identity and those who think this nation should preserve its way of life and its predominant, European-British character. That is the actual choice - as distinct from the theoretical choice between 'equality' and 'racism' - that our nation faces" [comment at: source].

"[I]n politically correct Britain you can starve and beat a child and very little is done, but if you have the wrong political views children will be taken from you immediately. If you work in education as I do, or any public sector job, you are in grave danger of losing your job if you express the wrong political views. Children in our schools are immediately withdrawn or suspended if they break the taboos of political correctness in relation to race or gender. Young children are reported to the police for saying the wrong things in the playground, especially if it is related to Islam or immigration. The agencies of the state are very quick to crush dissent and any questioning of the multiracial utopia they are creating. However when it comes to a starving and beaten four-year-old whose parents are immigrants the agencies of the state are not so quick to act" [source].

"Of course we should not be surprised by this, shocking as it is. We have recently witnessed the systematic rape and sexual abuse of young white girls by Pakistani men all over the country, and the police and social services simply refused to intervene in order to ensure good race relations and 'community cohesion'. When both the police and social services were finally forced to take action they made sure that the ethnicity of the perpetrators was kept well under wraps and denied that this had anything to do with Islam when it became obvious to all that those involved were men of Pakistani origin. There is no question that children continue to be let down by the agencies designed to protect them and it is clear that much of this is to do with political correctness, especially where immigrants are concerned. The whole system is rotten and must be replaced by decent people not infected with the disease of political correctness and multiculturalism" [source].

"It's difficult to wake Britain up when the younger generations know little or nothing of Britain how it used to be, and have been taught nothing about our own history in the context of world history. They are stuffed to the gills with [Hitler], the Nazis and the Holocaust and that's about it. ... they think history begins and ends in the first half of the 20th century with terrible wars. Children I know are unaware that our country used to be a white, Anglo-Saxon or Celtic, Christian, homogenous society. For them, the present mish-mash is the norm and they are educated at school to regard themselves as just another ethnic group. The children of indigenous people of these islands are slowly but surely being robbed of their heritage and birthright. If the present situation continues, future generations won't even know that these islands in the north west corner of Europe used to belong to their forebears. The worst of it is that no one is allowed to warn of the danger without being demonised by the liberal/left Common Purpose pro-multiculturalism establishment. Do you remember being consulted or being invited to vote on whether this country should become multicultural? No, of course not" [comment at source].

"So, the transformation of this country by mass migration, begun by New Labour to rub the Right's nose in diversity, has now moved up a gear. One in eight of us was born abroad - and how long before that's one in six, then one in four? These people are not (as I am) the children of British subjects born while overseas. They are people who have grown up in a different culture. Never before in our history have we faced the task of integrating a minority so large. Never before have we had such a feeble idea of what being British is. And yet people ask me, as if the idea were absurd, why I think this will be a Muslim country within a couple of generations. I can think of no force or idea or movement or faith more likely to prosper in the state to come. Like all other civilisations which lost their nerve and the will to live, European Christianity is destined to become a minority in its own territory. By the way, if you don't like this, and voted Tory at the last Election, you have no business complaining. I told you repeatedly that the Tory concern about immigration was faked. They don't want the power to stop it" [Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 30 August 2015].

"Can all the people who live in all the c**p countries all over the world who want to come to Europe and the UK be allowed to come? As the number would be in billions, the obvious answer is NO. Why, therefore are they allowing any to come in, when all it does is encourage millions more to follow suit?" [comment at source].

"Can we stop this transformation of all we have and are? I doubt it. To do so would involve the grim-faced determination of Australia, making it plain in every way that our doors are open only to limited numbers of people, chosen by us, enduring the righteous scorn of the supposedly enlightened. As we lack the survival instinct and the determination necessary, and as so many of our most influential people are set on committing a sentimental national suicide, I suspect we won't. To those who condemn reasonable calls for national self-defence as bigotry, hatred and intolerance (which they are not), I make only this request: just don't pretend you're doing a good and generous thing, when you're really cowardly and weak" [source].

"Those amongst the native populations of the First World who propagandise in favour of mass immigration do so in the belief that they will be untouched by the immigration because they live in affluent areas where immigrants cannot generally settle. Not for these people state schools which 'boast' that 'there are 100 languages here'; not for these people a need for increasingly scarce affordable (social) housing in places such as London; not for these people having to use grossly over subscribed medical services in their area. These people think they are safe from the effects of mass immigration, but if it continues their children and grandchildren will not be so lucky. There needs to be a penalty for those who promote and facilitate mass immigration, for example, forcing them to take immigrants into their homes and be responsible for their upkeep" [source].

"Homo sapiens is the social animal par excellence. All social animals need boundaries to their group because trust has to exist between the members of the group. Human beings can tolerate very large numbers in their group, but there is a limit. To be a member of a functioning human group, whether that be tribe, clan or nation, the members [of] the group must share sufficient distinguishing behaviours and attributes to create the necessary trust. Putting huge numbers of people with very disparate backgrounds together cannot create that trust. Anyone who doubts that should try to find any society where territory is shared by different racial or ethnic groups that does not have inter-group discord. They will not find one in history or the present" [source].

"A peaceful prosperous nation with a shared history, culture and language has no need for an interfering, meddling, aggrandizing State government. The political elites contemplate this scenario with utter horror. They are redundant. They cannot wield the power which would make them feel important. What to do? Fracture and disintegrate society by allowing an invasion of alien cultures (who are encouraged to keep THEIR sense of cultural cohesion intact), atomize people into identity groups - whether by gender or ethnicity or any other minute division one can come up with ... Once the inevitable reaction of disenchantment and disbelief overwhelms the society soon to be followed by rage, step in with sanctimonious and accumulating State power, FORCE tolerance, MANAGE the chaos and HERD the sheep into the same pen, whether they like it or not. ... The only solution is to expose the ideology of Political Correctness for what it is" [comment at source].

"To ensure the long-term safety of the British people and their culture, we must stop immigration from Muslim societies. Even the most moderate of Muslim-majority countries are immersed in serious human rights abuses. Even the best Islam has to offer is a crime in the civilised world, and many Muslims have no intention of being 'educated' by Westerners to change. Despite this, despite our complete inability to police the crimes that accompany Muslim immigration (including mass rape of non-Muslim women and girls) we continue to keep the borders open for more. This must stop" [source].

"We should end foreign aid (except in emergencies) and use those resources to restore the authority of the law in Britain. If those breaching immigration laws won't return to their native lands, they should be held in detention until they do. We have got to get tough and we have to do it soon. We will take no orders from unelected international bodies but work with allies against the global threat of sharia. None of this is controversial, it is merely the imposition of law as determined by the British majority. It is merely treating Muslims like everyone else and holding them to the same standards" [source].

"All non-Britons convicted of a violent crime (or involved in terrorism) should be deported from this country, because the British people must come first. It is the most important and moral and democratic duty of those who seek our vote. It's time for a political party to realize this" [source].

"When has 'anti-racism' or 'diversity' or mass immigration ever been demanded of any non-white populations anywhere? If this was being imposed on All and Only African populations, wouldn't that be an obvious attempt to rid the world of African populations?" [comment at source].

Racism

"The outraged progressive establishment ascribed racist motives to Trump. To do otherwise would have been to admit the truth of what he said. There are some truly awful places in the world run by horribly corrupt and brutal governments, places where our progressive elites would not wish to live. The word Trump is accused of using for them [s***hole] is a mild description. Hell on earth would be a better description for countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Somalia and Eritrea. Few enlightened Western progressives are interested in making these countries their homes. The immigration traffic is all one way; residents of these nations know all too well that they are s***holes" [source].

"To claim that Trump is racist for saying [that some countries are s***holes] is in itself racist. Trump mentioned states in Africa and Asia, and said nothing about race. It was the progressive puritans who pounced and shouted racism, making the assumption that these states are as they are because of the race of the inhabitants. These countries are not as they are because of the colour of their people, but because they are dominated by bad ideas; their kleptocratic governments are corrupt, their religion is oppressive and their culture is unable to adapt" [source].

"Postmodernists routinely condemn racism and intolerance as wrong but then say that there is no such thing as right and wrong. They are clearly not being serious. Either they do not really believe in moral nihilism or they believe that racism cannot be condemned!" [source].

"It's amazing how the left hold non-whites to a much lower standard than whites. It's so patronizing and racist but they don't get it. If a white guy committed the kind of violent acts of terrorism that Neo-Marxist Nelson Mandela committed you'd never hear the end of it" [comment at source].

"Didn't MacPherson define racism as 'any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person'? I wonder how the victims in this case, and their parents perceive it?" [comment at: source].

"For many years I have pointed out that the word 'racist' is an insulting slander, designed to smear good people and drive them out of public life. I have myself been charged with 'moral racism' by an enraged and hysterical book reviewer in The Guardian, for daring to dissent from the establishment view that cannabis is cool. I have even been accused, on Twitter, of riding my bicycle in a racist fashion through the streets of Cambridge. As with the good and selfless foster parents, persecuted and insulted by snivelling, insolent officials because they belong to UKIP, the accuser cannot produce any evidence that the accused is a racial bigot. That is because there isn't any. What the word means is 'someone who doesn't agree with the politically correct, multicultural consensus'. What it also means is that the new establishment will not even argue with such people. It will try to crush and silence them, by scaring them and smearing them, and lying that they are unreasoning bigots. In truth, many of the worst and most unreasoning bigots in this country are the Left themselves. They hate anyone who dares to disagree with them, and their policies have led to deep and lasting ethnic divisions which could easily have been avoided. They long ago stopped thinking, believing they were secure in power. But perhaps they have been too complacent. People are beginning to understand their lies, and they may not work much longer" [Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 25 November 2012].

"Toddlers should be taught about racism and singled out for criticism if they have racist attitudes, a Government-funded advisory group said yesterday. It told nursery teachers, playgroup leaders and childminders to record and report every racist incident involving children as young as three. These could include saying 'Yuk' about unfamiliar food. Even babies should not be ignored in the hunt for racism ... Nurseries are encouraged to report as many racist incidents as possible to local councils. 'Some people think that if a large number of racist incidents are reported, this will reflect badly on the institution,' it said. 'In fact, the opposite is the case'. The guidance said that anyone who disagrees is racist themselves" [source].

"Senior managers at a local authority have been criticised by the most senior family court judge in England and Wales over the way they handled a case involving a toddler who had been placed in foster care at birth because of the father's links to the English Defence League. ... social services staff said the youngster should be adopted - and had raised concerns about his father's morality. They were concerned because he had at one stage had some involvement with the 'racist' EDL ... A social worker said the nature of the values and beliefs of the EDL were 'immoral'. ... Sir James [Munby] said ... 'social services are not guardians of morality'" [source].

"There is a joke: the definition of a racist is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal. ... There are essentially two reasons the left use this insult. Firstly, as they lose the argument on immigration, they must shift the debate from facts to morality. Secondly, racism is such a damaging accusation that even when untrue, it can do great harm to opponents. ... Leftists do not live in a reality-based world. They live in a world of ideology and theory and 'wouldn't it be nice if'. As a result, they tend to be very uncomfortable with arguments that revolve around observable fact. In debates about immigration they ideologically believe that immigration is good. But when they are shown the facts about the negative impact of mass immigration, they become defensive. Leftists rarely win arguments based on the facts, as facts are not their currency of choice. Instead, they focus on the alleged moral failings of their opponent" [source].

"The Vikings were illegal immigrants when they landed in America but the 'racist' Native Americans wouldn't accept any sob-story from them, wouldn't provide any housing or benefits and in fact those violent 'racist thugs' shot arrows at them until they left. I mean, some of the poor immigrants were actually killed by these vicious 'fascists'! Why, when you think about it, those 'racists' stopped their country being over-run for the next 500 years or so. Shame on them!" [comment at: source].

"Whilst [Diane Abbott's] comment is undoubtedly racist she is not alone in believing that racism can only go one way nowadays. This [Conservative] Government (to my knowledge) has never prosecuted a person of any race or creed for insulting the views, beliefs or customs of the 'White indigenous Christian'. But if you were trying to dispose of the indigenous people where better to start? I personally expect nothing better from this odious woman!" / "I assume the Mets Twatter/Faceache squad are looking into it? No?" [comments at source].

"'Racism' - the charge with which those who reject any aspect of diversity are indicted" [source].

"Dear Parent/Carer, As part of the National Religious Education Curriculum together with the multicultural community in which we live, it is a statutory requirement for Primary School aged children to experience and learn about different cultures. ... Refusal to allow your child to attend this trip will result in a a Racial Discrimination note being attached to your child's education record, which will remain on this file throughout their school career", Mrs. L. Small, Head Teacher, Littleton Green Community School, Huntingdon" [source].

"[T]he fact that an individual like Mrs Small could attain the position of headmistress and threaten children with the lasting epithet of 'racist' for not going to a mosque is reflective of the dogma which defines state education throughout the country" [source].

"'Diversity' and 'racism' are fast destroying a people bound by a shared inheritance and history. These platitudes are succeeding where Adolph Hitler failed, and they are just as evil as he was. 'Diversity' and 'racism' are tools of dispossession" [source].

"If Tony Blair and any of the Prime Minsters after him had been Prime Minister during the Second World War, Britain and all Europe would have been defeated. Germany's Nazis would have been warmly welcomed into Britain. They would have been provided welfare benefits and allowed to barbarically attack our people and violently gang-rape and sexually enslave British children. Any Brit who protested would have been called a 'racist'; viciously persecuted and jailed by British leaders ... UK leaders spit on the graves of our brave World War Two heroes who fought and died so that we could live in freedom and safety" [comment at: source].

"I believed the PC rubbish 15/20 years ago but then had an awakening after 7/7. ... Brainwashing is only skin deep. I spoke [to] a Green Party supporter who described the Charles Hebdoe [sic] killers as 'black b@@tards'. So there we conceal our latent racism but because of so called hate speech laws we conceal it" [source].

"UKIP's primary political positions are the complete withdrawal from the EU and a halt to all International Socialist political and social experiments in mass immigration. (Unmandated experiments, need I say, on the British people.) Predictably then, Leftists have called UKIP a 'racist party' and 'far right' (the latter being a neologism for 'fascist' or even 'Nazi'). That's not a surprise; such people call virtually all those who dare to disagree with them (or to the Right of Che Guevara/Trotsky) 'racist' or 'far right'" [source].

"Sanya-Jeet Thandi claims to have been offended by 'the direction in which [UKIP] is going', which she describes as 'terrifying'. 'Ukip', she says, 'has descended into a form of racist populism that I cannot bring myself to vote for'. The primary piece of evidence for this is the UKIP poster campaign which reminds voters in the UK of the huge unemployment problem across the EU and then points out that unlimited immigration can mean that there could be a threat to UK jobs. You can argue about the economics, but it's much less inflammatory than Gordon Brown's 2007 speech in which he referred to 'British jobs for British workers'. That was a line taken directly from the old National Front. If you're not going to vote UKIP because of its posters, you definitely shouldn't have been voting Labour the past few years. Oh, that's right. References to immigration are only racist if UKIP makes them. Sorry, we forgot" [source].

"Our [government, education system, media, local councils] are intent on seeing us reduced to a small, servile race of people. Why they want to do this I simply don't know. Some of them are evil, some of them are naive and stupid and don't understand. But combined with the evil and with the naivety we are in serious, serious trouble, and our children and our grandchildren are going to be utterly confused. How did you allow this to happen? What sort of people were you to sit back and allow this to happen under your noses? Because you were frightened of being called a racist? Really, one word? One word has made you sit back and do nothing while your country was ripped from underneath your feet? You have got to be joking! But we're not joking" [Paul Weston, chairman of the political party Liberty GB, source].

"It's so important that we are not allowing ourselves to be called a racist if we stand up and say: I want to protect my country, I want to protect my culture, I want to protect my race. You are the racist, because ... you have deliberately reduced an indigenous people to servitude" [Paul Weston, chairman of the political party Liberty GB, source].

"[I]t is time that the politicians that govern/hope to govern, must stop being racist against its own [indigenous] population. In the recent scandals where thousands of girls have been sexually violated by Asian Muslims, nothing was done for years even though it was known to police and Councils as to what was happening. Nothing was done because of the fear of being branded racist - Blair and Cameron's book of 'political correctness'. Had it been the opposite and Muslim girls are being violated by [the indigenous Brits], it would have taken far less time for the authorities to act. But the foolishly tolerant public does not seem to give a damn" [comment at: source].

"Most shocking of all [on Question Time tonight 14 May 2015] was that none of the panellists and not a single member of the studio audience invoked the usual lazy 'racist' insults against UKIP" [comment at: source].

"Why has the establishment media suddenly dropped the 'UKIP is racist' lie?" / "They must be as bored with it as we are? Or maybe saving it to dust off later when UKIP really gets going on the OUT campaign" / "Or maybe it's a tacit admission that it was a media-manufactures, cynical and dishonest accusation" [comments at: source].

"What the politically correct media fail to understand is that when they shriek 'racist' at people who are not in any meaningful sense racist but who are merely expressing normal human feelings of tribal identity, far from antagonising the British population in general a huge proportion of that population will, secretly or otherwise, sympathise with the person labelled racist" [source].

"Any person who opposes the intake of even more Muslims into our communities is immediately judged in the harshest of terms: they are called the 'R' word, which is meant to shut them up and damage their reputation. ... We should be able to discuss any matter in polite and respectable terms, because people can think for themselves, and judge an idea on its own merits, without having to label anyone a 'racist' for stating the obvious" [source].

"Trump's recent words have caused the Left to become so clammy-handed and discombobulated that their only riposte to him is the mentally retarded epithet of 'racist' The other night on the Sky News press preview some leftist woman whose name I can't remember was so upset that she pointed out the 'sensitivity' of the Muslim community at this time. God forbid a few Muslims should get a funny look on a bus or in the street as we are blown up and shot. This idiot on Sky then started deriding Trump's hair, such was her paucity of ability to argue why Trump should not bar followers of Mohammed from entering his country" [source].

"Europe has not been this barbaric since the Roman occupation, all for the sake of not being called a 'racist'. Call me what you will, it's time to defend women, protect our children, and restore our civilisation regardless of what names the leftist socialists call us" [comment at source].

"Everybody is racist, only for many it is linked to socialist genocides carried out along racist lines (whilst ignoring the other other lot of socialists who committed genocide by class warfare). Being a racist does not mean that I have to be violent, it is just that I prefer being among people with whom I share a language and a compatible culture and I am not ashamed of it" [comment at: source].

"Our Constitution forbids the adoption of foreign law and Sharia Law is as incompatible and foreign to our founding documents and civil law as it gets. So, no, it isn't 'racist' or 'bigoted'. It is simply our Constitution that forbids Sharia" [comment at source].

"I believe that the problem caused by Islam in Britain is the biggest concern people have regarding the preservation of our society. Most people daren't raise this issue in public because of the bullying and intimidation of the left leaning mainstream media and the liberal elite snobs. I urge everyone to take the advice of the late American conservative activist Andrew Breitbart: walk towards the fire! Don't be bullied and intimidated by false left wing accusations of racism and bigotry. It is they who are guilty of the racism of low expectations in that they believe people from muslim countries are incapable of acting in a civilised way. They can if the law requiring them to do so is enforced. They are also guilty of bigotry, a complete intolerance of anyone who deviates from their moronic, cultural-relativist ideology, call them on these failings at every opportunity! We desperately need to return to the principle of equality before the law if we are to save our civilisation" [comment at source].

Regarding Charlotte Proudman/Bailye and Other Spoilt-Brat Feminists

"Where are these 'third-wave' feminists when girls as young as twelve are gang-raped by members of the 'Asian' ... community? Nowhere to be seen. They seem to condone this because it's 'in their culture', ... and who are we to judge, that would be 'racist'. Their ideology has now pervaded our public life and public services to such an extent that Rotherham Council and the South Yorkshire Police work together to prohibit protests against what happened there, because it's 'too expensive' to police; there are counter-demos by UAF and that lot, because protesting against decades of rape by members of the 'Asian' community is racist, ... and we can't have that... That is the hypocrisy of the metro-left, especially the female metro-left, a hypocrisy which literally stinks to heaven. According to their understanding a compliment is outrageous, but gang rape by the community they regard as their own clients - well, shrug your shoulders and pass on the other side of the street, or you're a racist, and that is worse even than murder, never mind rape" [source].

"Seventy years ago, German women were raped as a matter of course by the conquering Soviet soldiers, Nobody dared talk about it openly, and for decades it was regarded as something that happens in war, and it was the just deserts of those Germans. Today, we have another army invading. It is, so far, peaceful, but it is done with intent. It is called Hijrah but we mustn't talk about that, because that would be racist. When will all of us who have wives, daughters, grand-daughters, dare to stand up and say that we will not condone such behaviour, that we will not be cowed any more by the empty, disgusting chants coming from the left that such protest is racist? When will we take the 'third-wave' feminists to task for their hypocrisy, their self-aggrandisement, their delusions and their hard-heartedness in the face of the multiple rapes, in all nations in the EU who 'open their arms' to the hijrah migrants?" [source].

Rotherham

The following extended extract is from the article: That's What White Girls Are For

"I have written extensively on Muslim grooming gangs in the UK and know that these men target non-Muslim girls (usually white, but Sikh girls have also been victimised), who they regard as trash. In the course of my own investigations, I heard from a former victim that she had been told by Muslim men 'that's what white girls are for.'

"While [the Rotherham] abuse and rape carried on for decades, local government, police, social services, and others who are charged with protecting young people, did absolutely nothing to prevent it. Why? Overwhelmingly because they did not want to discredit the absurd and dangerous notion of multiculturalism. In many cases, people feared being labelled a 'racist', and this fear was greater than any concern for mass gang-rape in their own towns.

"Rotherham has come to symbolise ... the violent misogynistic attitudes of Muslim men towards women and girls - white women and girls in particular, the poisonous multiculturalism that causes us to pretend that all cultures are equal and therefore we should not criticise others - no matter how horrific, and the disgraceful political correctness that puts so-called 'community cohesion' above the rights and protections of young girls.

"Furthermore, Rotherham has come to symbolise the corrupt politics that will cover up mass rape in order to maintain the vote share of Muslim communities, and to prevent truths coming to light that may result in votes for parties that oppose mass immigration and multicultural lunacy. The fact of the matter is that Rotherham would never have happened if we had not filled our towns and cities with Islamic misogyny and anti-white hatred."

[End of Extract]

Definitions of Immigrant and Refugee

Immigrants:

"Immigrants are people who have left their homes to seek a better and more prosperous home in another country. They are not running away from anything, except perhaps poverty and lack of opportunities. They are leaving families and extended families behind them. The regard themselves as pioneers. They hope to establish themselves in a more prosperous environment. If and when they succeed in making good in their new homes, they will encourage families, extended families and friends to follow them" [source].

"Immigrants are almost always young men, travelling alone or with friends. If they have families at home, they have left them behind in conditions of reasonable safety and stability, hoping that, in due course, their families will be able to follow [source].

"Immigrants are subject to pull factors - they are attracted to their chosen destination" [source].

Refugees:

"Refugees are of two kinds: (a) There are political refugees who fear for their lives. These are people who are being persecuted. In most cases, they have become involved in politics in a way which the government of their country does not permit. These are also sometimes whole groups of people - Protestants in 17th century France, Jews in Hitler's Germany - who fear for their lives simply because of who they are; (b) refugees who are ... leaving their countries because their homes and places of work have been destroyed, and their lives have become increasingly intolerable due to the dangers, privations and anarchy of war. Refugees are families fleeing with children. They are people who would never have considered emigration of their lives had only been allowed to continue as they were a few years ago. They may want nothing better than to be reunited with their extended families and friends in their home countries if and when conditions there return to normal" [source].

"Refugees are responding to push factors, which are driving them out of their homes" [source].

"It may not be ideal, but the definition of a refugee is that he is fleeing from danger, not fleeing towards a higher standard of living" [source].

Identity Politics

"European culture has been gutted by Post-Modern 'victim'-obsessed PC indoctrination which has already warped the minds of the young" [comment at: source].

The following extended extract is from the article: The Origin of 'Identity Politics' & 'Political Correctness'

"Identity politics (sometimes dubbed 'political correctness') is the result of a political-Left major backlash against the mass of ordinary people (in Europe and 'the West'), beginning in the 1920s/30s, in the wake of the persistent failure of Marxist theory to be realised in European 'revolution' or any real change through democracy. In shifting the blame away from Marxist theory and those gullible enough to adhere to it, and on to those the theory had prescribed and predicted would have been the beneficiaries, if only they had responded accordingly ('the [white, male] workers'); then the cognitive-dissonance within the political-left mindset caused by this crisis to an extent was salved"

"As with any fervent ideology, a hallmark of the political-Left is interpreting anything and everything in its own ideological terms to claim as a manifestation of the ideology and its prophecy - jumping on a bandwagon, so to speak; though here only to hijack it. The bandwagon here was, of course, the American civil rights movement, which though enjoying ubiquitous support within black communities - to the point often of various forms of extremism - featured virtually nil endorsement of socialism ... It is from the time of this co-option that 'identity politics' dates; many considering that the movement was incorporated into the Left in the wake of King's assassination in 1968 - the major turning-point year in political-Left politics generally"

"'Civil rights', as the first great 'single-issue' campaign, served not least to provide an acceptable cloak for the Left to avoid provoking a resurgence of McCarthysim. The major social upheaval of 'civil rights' with its large-scale and widespread rioting was easily the nearest thing in then recent US history to look like the promised Marxist 'revolution', and obviously was just the practical application the 'theory' was seeking. Moreover, the protagonists (black Americans) were eminently separable form the now despised 'workers' per se, in being presentable as a new 'group; from outside of the former fray of 'boss' versus 'worker'.

"This accident of history served to add 'black' to 'woman' as 'the new oppressed' ... 'The worker' in effect was retrospectively stereotyped as both 'man' and 'white'. With the inverse of this stereotype of 'white' being not just 'black American' but 'black' - that is, ethnic-minority generically ... so it was that the new 'agents of social change' / 'disadvantaged' / 'oppressed' were extended from women to also include all ethnic minorities"

"It is only with the knowledge of how this developed that sense can be made of why ethnicity is held above the myriad other possible differences that could be utilised as in-group markers, when in fact there is nothing inherent in ethnicity as an in-group marker to produce inter-group prejudice that is particularly more pernicious"

"Indeed, the worst inter-communal conflicts nominally between different ethnicities usually are between different cultural heritages with no discernible 'racial' differences of any kind - and what (non-ethnic) differences there are can be minimal; the lack of contrast actually fuelling the intensity of conflict, such is the need for groups to feel distinguished from each other"

"Furthermore, ethnic prejudice is anything but restricted to or even predominantly 'white' on 'black': inter-ethnic (eg, 'black' on Asian) and ethnic-on-'white' 'racism' can be, often is and may usually be the greater problem; and a negative attitude to a certain ethnicity does not imply a similar attitude to other ethnicities"

"The specific US experience, given the highly divisive politics in the wake of the American Civil War over the basis of the Southern US economy in African slavery, does not translate to elsewhere; notably not to Europe - as was starkly evidenced in the experience of World War II 'black' American GIs stationed in England in how they were favourably received by locals, who sided with them when discriminated against"

"'Racial divides' in European 'white' host countries are the result not of mutual antipathy but affiliative forces, principally within migrant enclaves and secondarily within the 'host' community; in both cases being through in-group 'love', not out-group 'hate'" [Note from Bayith: though the latter part of this observation is indeed true in normal circumstances, this does not, of course, take account of the Islamic/Koranic doctrines of Al-Hijra (Immigration), Taqiyya (Lying and Deceit), and Razzia/Ghazwa (Rape and Slavery), Dawa (Cultural and Stealth Jihad), and Terrorist and Violent Jihad, carried out by fundamentalist Muslims as they settle in increasing numbers in Western countries with the sole and deliberate purpose of making every remaining Dar al-Harb ('House of War': i.e. any non-Muslim country) into a Dar al-Islam ('House of Submission': i.e all Muslim countries) until Islam finally achieves its longed-for global Caliphate.]

[End of Extract]

Malsi-Tung

The following is an extended extract from the blog article: What is Malsi-Tung?

"The nature of this mentality is very difficult to pin down. It is the product of many different social currents: liberalism; social liberalism; socialism; Christianity in its more non-conformist manifestations; Marxism; Progressivism; Political Correctness. People are committed in varying degrees to the features of this mentality ... they will tend to be suspicious of patriotic sentiments, seeing these as a way of excluding outsiders ... they will tend to be very solicitous of the needs of immigrants and minorities; they will tend to take the side of 'the other' rather than straightforwardly supporting the 'home team'; they will tend to be less suspicious of foreign powers and assume that all people are fundamentally motivated by the same generosity of spirit as themselves ... readily amalgamated with self-guilt and cultural self-denunciation. ...

"This utopian and naive mentality is now opening the gates of the city, metaphorically speaking, to the forces of Islam, a long-standing, powerful, relentless, and poorly understood social movement of enormous brutality. Deaf to the cries of those who know more about this movement, the details of its ideology and its historical record, they seek to silence these voices as the remnants of an out-dated, backward-looking mentality of bigotry and distrust. Simply be nicer to everyone and all will be well, they say.

"Malsi-Tung is the name I use to denote the interweaving of ... on the one hand Islam, which has well-documented, historically proven, and theologically grounded aspirations for global domination under Sharia; and Left/Liberal/Progressivism, a difficult-to-name and hard-to-classify set of beliefs, attitudes, assumptions, values and prejudices which are forming a deadly embrace with the wholly antithetical culture of Islam. These two forces ... are driving the world towards a new dark age characterised by things which the Liberal/Progressive world claims endlessly to be against, but against which apparently it is unwilling to offer any resistance, indeed it seems destined to hasten their progress. ...

"There is no word for this mentality so I have called it malsi-tung. Those afflicted with it I refer to as Malisites.

"The most despicable aspect of Malisites today is their pre-emptive surrender to Islam, a phenomenon they do not even bother to subject to serious enquiry. Basing their views on utopian assumptions instead of well-documented facts, they do everything in their power to smooth the path for this alien and cruel culture. If we do manage to avoid the descent into a New Islamic Dark Age, the part played by the Malisites will forever be remembered as one of the vilest in history"

[End of Extract]

The Burden Which Habakkuk the Prophet Saw:

The righteous cry out for God's punishment of the injustice in their lands:
O LORD, how long shall I cry, and thou wilt not hear! even cry out unto thee of violence, and thou wilt not save!
Why dost thou show me iniquity, and cause me to behold grievance? for spoiling and violence are before me: and there are that raise up strife and contention.
Therefore the law is slacked, and judgment doth never go forth: for the wicked doth compass about the righteous; therefore wrong judgment proceedeth.

The LORD God answers:
Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you.
For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwelling places that are not theirs.
They are terrible and dreadful: their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves.
Their horses also are swifter than the leopards, and are more fierce than the evening wolves:
And their horsemen shall spread themselves, and their horsemen shall come from far; they shall fly as the eagle that hasteth to eat.
They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.
And they shall scoff at the kings, and the princes shall be a scorn unto them: they shall deride every strong hold; for they shall heap dust, and take it.
Then shall his mind change, and he shall pass over, and offend, imputing this his power unto his god.

The dismay of the righteous at God's answer:
Art thou not from everlasting, O LORD my God, mine Holy One? we shall not die.
O LORD, thou hast ordained them for judgment; and, O mighty God, thou hast established them for correction.
Thou art of purer eyes than to behold evil, and canst not look on iniquity:
Wherefore lookest thou upon them that deal treacherously, and holdest thy tongue when the wicked devoureth the man that is more righteous than he?
They take up all of them with the angle, they catch them in their net, and gather them in their drag: therefore they rejoice and are glad.
Therefore they sacrifice unto their net, and burn incense unto their drag; because by them their portion is fat, and their meat plenteous.
Shall they therefore empty their net, and not spare continually to slay the nations?
I will stand upon my watch, and set me upon the tower, and will watch to see what he will say unto me, and what I shall answer when I am reproved.

The LORD God's reassurance to the righteous:
And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.
For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry.
Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith

[Habakkuk 1:1-2:4]

The Frankfurt School

"The Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution.

Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the 'oppressive' order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus - 'continuing the work of Western Marxists by other means' as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their 'quiet' cultural revolution ... the [Frankfurt] School recommended (among other things):

(1) the creation of racism offences,
(2) continual change to create confusion,
(3) the teaching of sex and homosexuality to children,
(4) the undermining of schools' and teachers' authority,
(5) huge immigration to destroy identity,
(6) the promotion of excessive drinking,
(7) emptying of churches,
(8) an unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime,
(9) dependency on the state or state benefits,
(10) control and dumbing down of media,
(11) encouraging the breakdown of the family.

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism' - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

(a) attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children,
(b) abolish differences in the education of boys and girls,
(c) abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces,
(d) declare women to be an 'oppressed class' and men as 'oppressors'."

"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"
(Isaiah 5:20-21)

"Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together,
against the LORD, and against His anointed, saying:
'Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.'
He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD shall have them in derision"
(Psalm 21:1-4)

"Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried;
but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand;
but the wise shall understand"
(Daniel 12:10)

Multiculturalism, Immigration, Racism General Articles | Political Correctness Articles Pages

Websites and Recommended Materials | Scripture References

Education | Islam | The Front Of It (Chart) | The Front Of It (Documentation)

Political Cultural and Social Issues | How To Support Bayith Ministries