Contents Up one level 1. Number 2. "Success" 3. The Old Order 4. Monuments 5. City of God? 6. A Tide 7. One-Way        

By John Cole

 

Action 3

Three churches to be found in Leeds city centre illustrate three of these ‘Seven Facts of Life’.

1.

St John’s, Briggate, is sandwiched between a multi-storey car park and a department store. It stands redundant, unused, unusable because of its historic interior.

It is virtually ignored by the city that has grown up around it - only serving as a backdrop when couples who have just married at the registry office up the hill come down to have their photographs taken outside its porch!

 

 

3. "The Old Order Passeth"

 

Many parish clergy in the Church of England would be polishing their haloes after reading the last section on ‘success’ and the gathered church.

"That’s a problem for congregational churches," they would say. "In the Church of England the parish priest has the cure of souls of everyone living in the geographical parish - of any religion or none."

The Church of England’s parish system was set up over a thousand years ago. The entire land is parcelled up into precise geographical areas. Until the 19th century the parish boundaries were the same for both church and civil administration; in fact the Church was the civil administration!

In theory the local Church of England church served (and still serves) everyone living in its area. The effect, even until quite recently, was to give the Vicar of that parish a distinct role within the community which was not offered to his free-church ministerial colleagues. For the Church of England priest was the Parson - and many Anglican clergy still see themselves in this role. Whether all the residents in their parishes do is another matter!

For two factors now mean that the traditional parson is on the verge of extinction:

1. The break-up of local communities.

2. The moves towards Christian unity.

And with the demise of the parson goes perhaps the central reason for having a parish system.

We have already noticed how once upon a time people lived their whole lives in one village. A trip to market was an adventure. Most could not read or write and their every need had to be met from within the village.

It was therefore quite natural for one person (‘parson’) to function as clerk, priest, counsellor, confidant and decision-maker for this totally integrated community.

Here was a true ‘cure of souls’ because everything which might serve to shape an individual’s spiritual growth lay within the confines of the village. In the middle of it was the priest, probably working his own plot of land just like everyone else.

Only a shadow remains of this local pastoral relationship following a tide of changes which has been flowing for at least the last 600 years - from the growth of the bourgeoisie and the ‘urbanisation’ of the 13th century, through the division of Christendom at the Reformation and the 18th and 19th century industrial revolution, to today’s multi-cultural, technological, ‘secular’ but still spiritually questing society.

The all-round ‘cure of souls’ that was envisaged when the parish system was set up can now only be sustained either a) among people who are willing to be drawn out of the real world to live in the substitute world of a gathered church or b) among those who are ‘trapped’ in a geographical locality and who thus establish their ‘tribe’ on that basis. Essentially these latter are the elderly, the infirm and parents with tiny children, in other words all who form the dependent half of the population.

Church of England clergy, wanting to be good ecumenists, also find that the quest for church unity drives them to see themselves primarily as ministers to a congregation on a par with their free-church colleagues.

The parish system may still be needed as brake stopping the Church of England from rushing too quickly into becoming a gathered church - with all its spurious ‘success’! But it is over-rated if it is still linked to the now virtually defunct role of ‘parson’.

 

Parish boundaries and parish church both serve as symbols of the dominance which the Church of England once had but has no longer.

In the countryside parish boundaries still make some degree of sense at least in terms of geography. But each parish can no longer have its parson, for the local unit is too small. In urban and suburban areas the boundaries are no more than arbitrary lines on a map, for the local unit is now the town or city itself, something much bigger.

However noisily clergy and church people in the Church of England proclaim their support for the parish system, the pressures inside and outside their church are driving them away from it.

These pressures include:

a society which sees ‘vicars’ (of any denomination) as shopkeepers, proprietors of local churches, not parsons to their locality:

a society which affirms denominations as an expression of consumer choice;

a church which for financial and synodical reasons has its attention focused on membership and maintenance rather than God’s mission in God’s world:

a church which consequently flirts with an illusion of success based on the prejudices of contemporary society rather than a deep understanding of the Gospel.

Even where churches would claim to be going against the trend because their priority is seeking to convert others, in practice their motive will be seen as recruitment - and all the pressures to operate as a ghetto church will thus be reinforced.

Almost unconsciously, in the face of a parish system which is long past breaking point, Church of England congregations find themselves trapped into becoming gathered churches - either by seeking that illusory ‘success’ or by settling for being the ‘faithful few’ - or, in a few cases, by becoming narrowly and aggressively evangelistic.

 

Yet the gathered church is not the only alternative.

1. At the very same time that the Church of England is drifting towards congregationalism, many churches with ‘congregational’ roots are, with the exception of certain fundamentalist groups, now moving quite strongly in the opposite direction - as they become increasingly aware of the society in which their church members live and the complex and challenging task of expressing God’s love within it.

2. No less significant, however, - as a pointer to where the future lies - may be a slow and silent seepage away from regular church-going by people who are in other respects extremely positive about their faith quest. These are people for whom the tribal conventions of the gathered church, the Sunday morning congregational experience, do not meet their spiritual needs.

More of these people remain within the institution of the church than leave it, but they suffer considerable pain and frustration while they remain. They find their nourishment, as do others who are further back on the road to faith, in smaller and more informal gatherings of Christian disciples - often coming from different denominational traditions.

These people are the ones who find meaning at Taizé and Iona, in Cursillo, Focolare or at Julian group meetings.

As they come together in small faith communities they can study and pray, care for one another, live and worship, and be engaged with God’s world.

Here they find the richness of the empowering and healing love of God.

In these contexts people ‘outside the tribe’ can also find their way forward on their journey of faith - but it may be some time, if at all, before they find their way into the institutional fellowship of the church.

Click here for Action Step 3

Go to next page