|
Some Questions for
Remainers
Concerning Our
Sovereignty:
Who runs your home, your
household? Who determines its ethos? Who controls its
organisation? Who decides its practices? Who manages its
finances? Who oversees its safety and wellbeing? Who
runs its day-to-day details?:
-
You and the members
of your household?
-
Or your really nice
neighbours - with whom you often socialise?
-
Or the folks who
live halfway along the road - at whom you smile and with whom
you pass the time of day when you see them in the street or on
the school-run, but that's about it?
-
Or the folks who
live right at the end of the street - whom everyone avoids when
they see them coming because they just cannot mind their own
business but want to interfere in everyone else's business too?
You do? Now why is
that?
Concerning Our
Justice:
When one of your
children comes to you and tells you that your other child has
trampled over your rose bushes, ridden their bike through your
hydrangeas, and cut the flowers off your prize orchids, but the
accused child vehemently denies it, what is your response?:
-
Is it to take great
care to investigate the truth of the matter, and then discipline
whichever child did it in accordance with the very fair justice
system you have long-established in your home?
-
Or is to lock your
accused child in a dark and dingy cupboard under the stairs
whence he will languish for an
indeterminate and lengthy time whilst the tale-bearing child
just carries on with his life, and you carry on with your's?
You would do the former?
Now why is that?
Concerning Our
Finances:
Who controls your
finances? Who organises your household's budget? When
you receive your monthly salary or invoices paid from your clients:
-
Do you
determine what percentage of it is necessary to cover your
household's bills, groceries, mortgage or rent, holidays, chosen
charities, your children's pocket money, any debts, desired
savings, etc, and apportion accordingly?
-
Or do you give a
rather large chunk of it to your nice neighbour, or the
household you don't know hugely well halfway along the road, or
that incredibly profligate family in the next street, and allow
them to manage it for you?
You control the entirety
of your finances? Now why is that?
Concerning Our
Guests:
Do you have a front door
(and perhaps a back door too)? When you are at home, when you
go to bed each night, when you're out for the day, or away on
holiday:
-
Do you shut your
front door and ensure that it is firmly locked to secure the
privacy and the safety of your household?
-
Or do you leave your
front door and all your windows wide open with a huge sign on
your gate inviting your nice neighbour, the folks along the road
whom you don't know hugely well, and the angry and violent young
man with the bull mastiff on the other side of town, to all come
in and take up residence with you and your family?
-
To signal your
virtue to your new 'tenants' do you turf your children out of
their bedrooms, deprive them of their food and clothing, and
take away their toys, and give all these things to the new
residents of your house, and expect your children to love their
new situation?
-
Do you simply smile
benignly and defer without demur when some of your new residents
bar you entrance into 'their' rooms, refuse to acknowledge the
rules of your household, and, further, begin to try to impose
their own very questionable 'rules' onto you and your family -
in your own house?
-
Do you "see no evil,
hear no evil, and speak no evil" when your sons are murdered and
your daughters are raped by some of the members of your new
'family'?
-
Indeed, do you even
go so far as to rush out into the streets to gather many more of
these poor guests into your home?
You secure your home,
and you favour and protect your children? Now why is that?
I have just one more
question:
Why is it that what you
are not willing to apply - absolutely rightly - to your family you are willing to apply to
your country?
Elizabeth McDonald
23 June 2016
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Liberty:
the Battle for the Very Soul of Britain
The
following is an extended extract from
Battle for the Very Soul of Britain
"Nine hundred and fifty
years ago, between two hillocks at Hastings, an Anglo-Saxon king
took an arrow in his eye and England surrendered her independence.
That was our last - should I say most recent? - defeat on home soil.
King Harold's forces fought valiantly but they had been exhausted by
two earlier battles ... A shrewd and ruthless Frenchman, Guillaume
of Normandy, seized power and London's Witan parliament was never
heard of again. ...
"I have been
contemplating poor King Harold a fair amount recently. ... As a
schoolboy I visited the northern French town of Bayeux to see [the]
tapestry and remember a sting of sorrow as I saw the needlework
images of vanquished Anglo-Saxons. It was always the same when I
read history yarns about British chieftain Caractacus fighting the
Romans on his hilltop and later being paraded in Rome as a chained
captive; or gallant ... Boadicea, Queen of the Iceni tribe, charging
towards the Roman lines in her chariot ... In such accounts, I
always rooted for the Brits. ... I always wanted the dwellers of our
dank and foggy, sea-set isle to seize the day. Was it a nascent
sketchwriter's inate bias or inherited love of country from my
fiercely patriotic parents? Was that love wrong? Is that love wrong?
I still feel that way.
"The likes of Mr Cameron
and his fellow Europhiles ... presumably feel something different
when they look at the Bayeux tapestry. I suppose they experience
a glow of quiet satisfaction that William and his forces of European
integration over came the locals. ... A deep-rooted part of me
rebels against that. ... I grieve for the freedoms that were
squashed. And I feel just the same when I look at an castle built by
English lords to crush dissent in Scottish and Welsh territory. My
sympathies lie with the invaded. ...
"Hereward the Wake [a]
Lincolnshire freeman ... had his lands taken by the Normans and
decided to do something about it. For a few years after 1066,
Hereward and his small army operated out of the Cambridgeshire town
of Ely, then an island. They were beaten only after a treacherous
monk showed the Normans one of the secret paths to Ely through the
Fenland marshes. ... Almost a millennium after the event, I feel a
lively indignation on Hereward's behalf. What a cur that monk was to
betray him. What if Hereward had continued to oppose William? Could
he have combined with the still unconquered Celts and Northumbrians
to drive out the 'ingengas'? Or was Norman rule as inevitable as
supporters of the EU now say their governing body is inevitable? As
for that treacherous monk, was he a sort of Roland Rudd of his day
... the City PR smoothie pulling strings for the Remain camp? ...
"My support for Hereward
may reflect a surfeit of foolish romanticism. But it may also echo
enduring truths about the importance of self-determination and of
remaining true to one's ancestral heritage. For what are we if we
deny the past? What is the point of being British if we are not able
to say who governs us? And let there be no doubt: if we vote to stay
ion the EU, we will not be able to dislodge the elite that runs
Brussels. They will be impervious to our democratic disapproval.
They will be as safe as William and his shaven-headed Normans were
in their mighty castle keeps. ...
"The Leave campaign ...
has urged voters to quit the EU for a range of reasons ... Hereward
the Wake ... would have heard Vote Leave talk of how we must 'take
control' and would surely have thought 'I don't really want control
- I want liberty.' ...
"It would obviously be
good for us to retrieve national control of trade decisions, tax
matters, ... immigration policy ... But where is the optimism in
Leave's campaign? Where is the appeal to something more positive,
more human, more ardent? The hearts of Hereeward the Wake and his
'green men' would have burned for something greater; something more
essential. You could call it self-determination or independence but
it is basically the right to plant your feet on the clifftops of
Kent, raise your eyes to the cloud-scudding sky, and relish your
ancient liberty as a free-born Briton. ...
"I think of my
grandfathers. One was wounded three times on the Western Front in
World War I. The other landed in Normandy - Normandy! - just before
D-Day to clear the beaches of mines. They fought for king and
country, yes, but they fought most of all for an idea: freedom. The
days of ancestral sword and scramasax may have passed but that
powerful notion of liberty, the spirit of British dissent which
flared so wonderfully in the East Anglian fens 950 years ago, must
never be allowed to die. Without it, we would be an island without
pride, an island shorn of soul"
[End of Extract]
Norman and Saxon
"'My son,' said the
Norman Baron, 'I am dying, and you will be heir to all the broad
acres in England that William gave me for my share
when we conquered the Saxon at Hastings, and a nice little handful
it is. But before you go over to rule it I want you to understand
this:
"The Saxon is not like
us Normans. His manners are not so polite. But he never means
anything serious till he talks about justice and right.
When he stands like an ox in the furrow with his sullen set eyes on
your own, and grumbles, 'This isn't fair dealing,' my son,
leave the Saxon alone.
"You can horsewhip your
Gascony archers, or torture your Picardy spears; But don't try that
game on the Saxon; you'll have the whole brood round your ears.
From the richest old Thane in the country to the poorest chained
serf in the field, they'll be at you and on you like hornets, and,
if you are wise, you will yield.
"But first you must
master their language, their dialect, proverbs and songs. Don't
trust any clerk to interpret when they come with the tale of their
wrongs.
Let them know that you know what they're saying; let them feel that
you know what to say. Yes, even when you want to go hunting, hear 'em
out if it takes you all day.
"They'll drink every
hour of the daylight and poach every hour of the dark. It's the
sport not the rabbits they're after (we've plenty of game in the
park).
Don't hang them or cut off their fingers. That's wasteful as well as
unkind, for a hard-bitten, South-country poacher makes the best
man-at-arms you can find.
"Appear with your wife
and the children at their weddings and funeral and feasts. Be polite
but not friendly to Bishops; be good to all poor parish priests.
Say 'we', 'us' and 'ours' when you're talking, instead of 'you
fellows' and 'I'. Don't ride over seeds; keep your temper; and
never you tell 'em a lie!"
[Poem by Rudyard
Kipling]
Free Nations
The
following is an extended extract from
Freenations
"Free nations, like free
people, are the condition for democracy, free trade and
international peace. No system based on freedom under the law and
majority votes in elections can exist without a common language,
history, [and] religion which form the basis of the law and a
predominant culture to which immigrants must gradually assimilate.
Such are the achievements of the Nation States. Supranational States
achieve the opposite - war, internal conflict, economic failure,
financial collapse and social decay, as the USSR, Nazi Europe and
the EU today so clearly demonstrate. ...
"The great wars of the
20th century were fought to free the nation states from the hegemony
of imperial powers, from fascism and from communism. The years of
general peace after 1945 coincided with the rapid growth in the
number of nation states, and the UN Convention on Civil and
Political Rights of 1966 affirmed the rights of all peoples to self
determination. But gradually over the last 50 years the power of
supranational government (the EU being the most aggressive) and
multinational corporations frustrated and overturned the will of
voters and the power of the consumer. They formed that combination
of corporate and State power that has always destroyed democracy and
nationhood and has always been associated with the rise of fascism
ad German imperialism in Europe.
"From the Single European
Act of 1986 and the Maastricht Treaty of 1992, conflict and wars,
ethnic cleansing, the break up of nations and inter-nation tensions
have risen in Europe. The results of the wars which freed the
nations have been reversed with the political map of Europe now
looking remarkably like 1914 and the height of Nazi hegemony in
1941. The EU has now extended further East than even Hitler was able
to venture as recent agreements between the EU and Ukraine, Georgia
and Moldova testify. Those agreements - like the early trade
agreements of the European Common Market - have already required
constitutional surrender by those nations and now there is built by
German Europe from the West something akin to the Russian Europe
which Stalin built from the East. ...
"Corporatism and Fascism
are cross party. They combine the left, the right, and in particular
the unthinking centre. ... Therefore the solution is cross party.
...
"Nationism [describes]
the (non-nationalistic) concept of the democratic sovereignty of
nations trading and co-operating peacefully with other nations.
Self-governing and democratic at home and free trading and
cooperating abroad, there is nothing aggressive about the nation
state.
"NATIONISM: (a)
democratic people, (b) equality of nations, (c) cultural homogeneity
to ensure democracy, (d) free movement of goods and capital, (e)
diffused political and economic power, (f) stable money for people
to save.
"NATIONALISM: (a)
political State power over other nations, (b) multicultural imperial
supranational power, (c) controlled trade to ensure political
control, (d) central political and corporate control, (e) inflation
for the State to reduce its debt"
[End of Extract]
The Tower of Babel: EU /
UN / NWO
"These are the families
of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and
by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.
And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they
found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there. And
they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them
thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for
mortar. And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a
tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name,
lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.
And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the
children of men builded. And the LORD said, Behold, the people
is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do:
and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have
imagined to do. Go to, let us go down, and there confound
their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.
So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all
the earth: and they left off to build the city. Therefore is
the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the
language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them
abroad upon the face of all the earth" (Genesis 10:32-11:9).
The Frankfurt School
"The Frankfurt School
believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the
hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the
problems facing society, then that society would never reach the
state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary
to provoke socialist revolution.
Their task, therefore, was as
swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do
this they called for the most negative destructive criticism
possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to
de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the
'oppressive' order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a
virus - 'continuing the work of Western Marxists by other means' as
one of their members noted.
To further the advance
of their 'quiet' cultural revolution ... the [Frankfurt] School
recommended (among other things):
(1) the creation of racism
offences,
(2) continual change to create confusion,
(3) the teaching
of sex and homosexuality to children,
(4) the undermining of
schools' and teachers' authority,
(5) huge immigration to destroy
identity,
(6) the promotion of excessive drinking,
(7) emptying of
churches,
(8) an unreliable legal system with bias against victims
of crime,
(9) dependency on the state or state benefits,
(10)
control and dumbing down of media,
(11) encouraging the breakdown of
the family.
One of the main ideas
of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism'
- the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences
between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships
between men and women. To further their aims they would:
(a) attack
the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and
mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary
educators of their children,
(b) abolish differences in the
education of boys and girls,
(c) abolish all forms of male dominance
- hence the presence of women in the armed forces,
(d) declare women
to be an 'oppressed class' and men as 'oppressors'."
"The Queen's Majesty hath the chief
power in this realm of England and other her dominions,
unto whom
the chief government of all estates in this realm, whether they be
ecclesiastical or civil,
in all causes doth appertain, and is not
nor ought to be subjected to any foreign jurisdiction"
(The
Thirty Nine Articles of Religion ... as by Law Established,
Article 37)
"To achieve world government,
it is necessary to remove from the minds of men
their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national
patriotism, and religious dogmas"
(Brock Chisolm, Director of the
UN World Health Organization)
"Woe unto them that call evil
good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that
put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"
(Isaiah 5:20-21)
The UK EU Referendum:
Articles | Questions to Consider |
Quotes and Comments |
Websites Books Etc |
YouTubes and Videos
The Propaganda War: Articles |
The Propaganda War: Quotations and Comments
The Disgusting Exploitation of the Murder of Jo Cox MP
|
Further Articles, Quotations, and Comments on
the EU
UK Independence Day 23 June 2016
Further Articles, Quotations, and Comments on
the EU
Index of
Articles on Various PC Topics
|
Index of PC Quotations, Comments, Miscellaneous
Information
Websites and Recommended Materials on PC
|
Scripture References on PC
Education |
The Front Of It (Chart) |
The Front Of It (Documentation)
Bayith BTR
Articles |
How
To Support Bayith Ministries
|
