![]() |
technology notions |
![]() |
|
[accommodation] [adoption] [assimilation] [availability] [commodity] [device] [diffusion] [focus] [innovation] [leanback/leanforward] [neophilia] [penetration] [progress] [resistance] [technology] [technology transfer] [visibility] |
||||
![]() |
Many discussions about technology and technology change are handicapped
by a simplistic set of notions about technology.
(Technology is often seen as a mass of devices. As more and more devices are invented and launched, at apparently increasing speed, so we feel overwhelmed by technological "progress".) |
Assimilation plus Accommodation equals Adaptation
Veryard Project Papers | Technology Change Management: Assimilation & Accommodation |
Veryard Project Papers | Technology Adoption |
Assimilation plus Accommodation equals Adaptation
Veryard Project Papers | Technology Change Management: Assimilation & Accommodation |
"Goods that are available to us enrich our lives and, if they are
technologically available, they do so without imposing burdens on us. Something
is available in this sense if it has been rendered instantaneous, ubiquitous,
safe, and easy."
Veryard Project Papers | Ecological Principles: Availability |
According to Borgmann, it is a general trend of technological development, that mechanisms are increasingly hidden behind service interfaces. Borgmann calls this the device paradigm. It is exemplified by CBSE.
In the literature, there are two largely separate fields of diffusion
theory. Security specialists study the diffusion of components that
represent security threats –software viruses and worms, among other things.
Meanwhile, diffusion theorists mostly study the diffusion of “respectable”
and “well-behaved” technologies.
Veryard Project Papers | The Diffusions of Components
(pdf)
This paper takes an ecological perspective on diffusion factors within the software component market. It analyses the characteristics of software components that are favourable to diffusion, and poses a radical critique of traditional notions of software requirements and software quality. It also suggests a strategic view of software components and other technological artefacts as evolutionary envelopes rather than fixed collections of properties. Information Leakage (html) |
Internet Links | Diffusion
(Tom McMaster)
Innovation and Diffusion Theory Studies (Tor Larsen) Information Diffusion Literature (Roger Clarke) |
Veryard Project Papers | Organic Planning |
Internet Links | The Focusing Institute |
type | definition | process industry example | software engineering example |
Product Innovation | inventing new products or devices | Discovering a new drug - for example a herb extract with medical properties. | Building a wholly new kind of information system, not just another order processing or video store system |
Process Innovation | inventing new processes | Being able to make the drug in the laboratory. | Experimenting with component-based development. |
Production Innovation | changing the system, changing the organization
in other words, institutionalizing the innovation by establishing organizational forms and infrastructures to make the new process flexible and scaleable. |
Being able to make large quantities of the drug to high standards of purity from cheap raw materials. | Achieving high levels of component reuse across a large organization. |
Veryard Project Papers | Our Innovation Practice
Implementing an Innovation Programme Demanding Solutions A theoretical model of technological innovation |
Internet Links | Innovation and Diffusion Theory Studies |
Leanback technologies are those that you can relax into using. For most people, television, film and books are leanback media.
Leanforward technologies are those that require effort and concentration. For most people, computers and the internet are still leanforward. For students writing essays, or cramming for exams, books are also leanforward.
Leanback suggests greater availability and invisibility than leanforward. Leanback implies passive reception, while leanfoward encourages the illusion that the recipient is somehow in control.
Leanback and leanforward imply different modes of pleasure. In some cases, greater awareness and deeper pleasure can be gained by leaning forward instead of leaning back. Media studies and some forms of therapy may help to develop such awareness. Some media products aim to excite their audiences into a leanforward state akin to jouissance - this may generate catharsis, even without the corresponding awareness. This relates in a complex way to authenticity.
The leanforward/leadback distinction represents an important yet little-understood dimension of business strategy.
Veryard Project Papers | Pleasure Principle |
Veryard Project Papers | Neophilia |
Use of this word to describe the adoption of technology is not only unpleasantly aggressive, but also falsely one-sided. It encourages the illusion that the technology is a fixed device, developed or constructed in one place, from where it is propagated or diffused. It encourages the illusion that the recipients are faced with a simple binary choice - to accept (adopt) or refuse (resist). It creates a false separation between active and passive agents - technology actors and acted-upons.
Veryard Project Papers | Technical Progress |
In our work, we are careful to characterize resistance, not as something
to be overcome, but as something to be understood and accommodated.
Veryard Project Papers | Resistance |
A more sophisticated view of technology concentrates not on the devices
themselves, but on the relationships between devices and commodities. These
relationships are often hidden by an exclusive emphasis on the device,
which Borgmann calls the device
paradigm.
Veryard Project Papers | Demanding Solutions A theoretical
model of technological innovation
Aramis, or the Love of TechnologyReview of book by Bruno Latour |
Diffusion Models | Diffusion is primarily a transfer and spreading of knowledge. Organizational power may be used to support or resist this diffusion. | Diffusion models can be used to predict the overall commercial value of an innovation and the timing at which a critical mass may be expected. |
Penetration Models | Technology penetration is an act of power by the innovation, its vendors and supporters. This power may or may not be resisted by the energies of the organizations and markets that are potential users of the innovation. | Penetration models can be used by vendors and policy-makers to increase the rate and extent of penetration, and by organizations and policy-makers (not the same ones) to reduce or prevent penetration. |
Implementation Models | Technology implementation is an act of power by the organization itself, which selects, procures and applies a technical solution to some perceived problem or opportunity. The effectiveness of this implementation is moderated by the knowledge and energies of the organization. | Implementation models may be used by organizations to accelerate the effective deployment of an innovation. They may be used by vendors to increase the implementability of an innovation, and to reduce the total cost of ownership. |
Veryard Project Papers | Practical Pitfalls and Dilemmas of Technology Transfer |
Internet Links | IFIP Working Group 8.6 |
Borgmann introduces the term device
paradigm to characterize the way technology conceals itself. In Borgmann's
account, technological progress increases
the availability of a commodity or service,
and at the same time pushes the actual device or mechanism into the background.
Thus technology is either seen as a cluster of devices, or it isn't seen
at all.
Veryard Project Papers | Technology and Visibility |
top | ![]() |
|
|
Copyright © 1999-2004 Veryard Projects Ltd http://www.veryard.com/tcm/technotions.htm |