Bayith Home   |   Bayith BTR Articles


The Hebrew word 'Bayith' can be translated in several ways but usually means 'house' or 'foundation'. Our ministry aims to be a welcoming house that helps to provide believers with foundational material to bless and encourage you.

©  Elizabeth McDonald & Dusty Peterson,  Bayith Ministries www.bayith.org  email: bayith@blueyonder.co.uk   Please note that the inclusion of any quotation or item on this page does not imply we would necessarily endorse the source from which the extract is taken; neither can we necessarily vouch for any other materials by the same authors, or any groups or ministries or websites with which they may associated, or any periodicals to which they may contribute, or the beliefs of whatever kind they may hold, or any other aspect of their work or ministry or position.

 

Cultural Marxism's "Long March Through The Institutions" of Western Civilisation

"I saw the revolutionary destruction of Society as the one and only solution.
A worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries"
[George Lukacs, The Frankfurt School, {date}]

"We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks" [Willi Munzenberg, The Frankfurt School, {date}]

 

The European Union Migrant Crisis

Quotations and Comments

Emotional Propaganda Trumps Rational Thoughtfulness   |   Moral Pornography and Narcissistic Virtue Signalling

The Death of Aylan Kurdi   |   The Impact on Public Services   |   Operation 'Adopt a Muslim'

Zakat (Third Pillar of Islam): Islamic Charity/Aid Towards Muslims   |   ISIS Jihadis Posing as Refugees   |   A Sense of Entitlement and Hijrah

What About Christian (and Other) Refugees?   |   The Eradication of Christianity in the West   |   The Betrayal of Our Nations

The Islamic Doctrine of Razzia and the Dhimmitude of the 'Humanitarian' Left

Identity Politics   |   The Burden Which Habakkuk the Prophet Saw   |   The Frankfurt School

The European Migrant Crisis: Articles

Multiculturalism, Immigration, Racism: General Articles

Multiculturalism, Immigration, Racism: General Comments and Quotations

Islam: General Articles   |   Islam: General Comments and Quotations

 

What is Genocide?
The term 'genocide' was coined by legal scholar Raphael Lemkin in 1943:
"Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of personal security, liberty, health, dignity and lives of the members of such groups" [quoted at:
source]

"God ... hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth,
and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
That they should seek the LORD" [Acts 17:26,27]

"Everything which is now taking place before our eyes threatens to have explosive consequences for the whole of Europe. Europe's response is madness. We must acknowledge that the European Union's misguided immigration policy is responsible for this situation. Irresponsibility is the mark of every European politician who holds out the promise of a better life to immigrants and encourages them to leave everything behind and risk their lives in setting out for Europe. If Europe does not return to the path of common sense, it will find itself laid low in a battle for its fate. Those who are overwhelmed cannot offer shelter to anyone" [Viktor Orban, PM of Hungary, 03:09:2015].

"You can avoid reality but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality"
[Ayn Rand, quoted at source].

 

 

 

Emotional Propaganda Trumps Rational Thoughtfulness

"It is, of course quite right that Europe has woken to the sheer scale of human suffering in Syria. It is equally right that our compassionate instincts will drive us to fund-raise and campaign for the innocent victims of the conflict. But that compassion must be realistic and clear-headed" [source].

"If you cast your mind back a few weeks, many of us pointed out ... how come we were being told in reports about the poor women and children being forced to flee, but only saw strapping young men in their early twenties, be it in the leaking boats in the Mediterranean or in the Calais camps. So then we got photos of young women and children ... some were so obviously faked that people were reminded of a certain practice in certain Middle Eastern countries of using children as human shields. ... [These] photos and reports are now the staple of EU MSM reports. You'll also have noticed that suddenly there's hardly anything written about Calais. Have they perhaps all vanished all of a sudden?" [source].

"The MSM will use all and any tear-jerking photos, images and stories to brainwash us all, to make us vote based on emotions, not on facts. ... That's how and why this photo of that truly innocent little boy finally has worked in the way the EU Establishment - in the EU member state capitals as well as in Brussels - have always wanted: emotions and feelings trumping facts. ... That's why that photo worked - and that's why we better prepare for more of such images" [source].

"I think we need to be fully aware of the propaganda war going on here - not just in regard to mixing up asylum seekers, politically persecuted people, refugees, and economic migrants who are mostly illegal immigrants. The concerted crocodile tears about that drowned little boy shows clearly how politicians and MSM are working in concert: make people feel sad and outraged, so that politicians can 'help' alleviate the hurt and outrage - by taking in more 'refugees' who are generally young healthy males belonging to a certain religion ... Do we really want more Rotherhams?" [comment at source].

"[I]t has now come to pass that anybody at all who dares to question a policy of 'we will take you all, regardless' is branded as a disgusting right-wing populist without heart. ... The very strange thing is that this vituperative attitude isn't shown against the people smugglers. Those smugglers seem to be some sort of protected species, as far as the Left is concerned. They don't even shout about the inhumanity of their profiteering from the misery of others, ... You've heard about the now 70 people found dead in a truck in Austria, ... Allegedly, the doors of that truck had been wired shut. Am I the only one who sees a disturbing and disgusting parallel to the use of trucks, doors locked, as 'extermination' instruments during that inhumane regime in Germany over 70 years ago? How and why is it that the EU Left does not see this but would rather fight and besmirch those in the EU member states who can see that unlimited immigration is unsustainable? Have we now reached the point where emotions, feelings, irrational 'empathy' are all that matter, and where rational though is deemed to be hard-hearted and beyond the pale?" [source].

"Surely we need open, rational debate so we can thrash out solutions. If people's worries or objections are unfounded, then expose them to the light and watch them wither away. Don't try to shove them under the carpet" [source].

Regarding "the news reports ... arm-waving, hand-wringing, over-excited and emotive accounts of their plight, designed to evoke sympathy rather than state facts. It is awful to see bewildered, crying children, but why are they being dragged into dangerous, frightening and uncertain situations by their parents? Is it really because the place they've come from is even more intolerable? If so, why do they spurn the refuge they are given where they land and insist on travelling much further, through borders and barbed wire, to reach the northern countries such as Germany or the UK? I'd like an explanation of these and other questions from the reporters, but they just don't seem interested in asking them. This isn't news reporting, but propaganda" [comment at source].

"[O]ne's got to read publications from elsewhere [than the MSM] to get an impression beyond that pushed by the hacks. ... We're being played for fools, and asking questions ... means that, in the eyes of the Westminster Establishment, [we] are heartless, xenophobic and extreme right-wing. It's only about emotions now, not about facts" [comment at source].

"[M]assive propaganda, lying, obfuscation, subterfuge, blackmail of dissenters and sheer terror at the hand of the states' and EU's ruling elites, hired 'anti-racist' hounds, journalists groomed by postmodern Marxist mentors, freelance Antifa shock troops, and their Muslim allies. The psychotic illusion started long ago, when Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi foisted his European Union 'dream' onto the European elite in the 1920s. The elite then foisted it on a bamboozled population, beginning in the 1950s-60s" [source].

"[I]n the UK, families of British jihadists killed in Syria are preparing to sue the government for compensation. ... [T]he centrist Daily Express reports that a sign with Kitchener telling Muslims to get out of Britain is 'sick hate'; par for the course in a country that sentenced its own Royal Marine to life in prison for killing a Taliban enemy. ... [T]he hashtag #refugeeswelcome is the hottest Twitter thing among British 'celebrities', exceeding even their self-loving selfies. ... Actress Emma Thompson, reports the British press, blasts her country's failure to take on more refugees as 'racist'. No one reports why Western mass media consider the socio-political opinions of nincompoops with good cheekbones and a talent for mimicry worthy of publication" [source].

"It's the sympathy of the bleeding hearts that leads to dead children whose parents are willing to risk their lives for their own economic goals. The left creates the crisis and then indicts everyone else for refusing to accept its solution that would make it even worse. The 'humanitarian catastrophe' in which migrants use their children as photogenic human shields would go away if the doors were closed to everyone except real refugees who were not part of this war. The only thing that taking in fake refugees does is attract more of them and that empowers the left which uses dead children for its power and profit at more places than just Planned Parenthood" [source].

"This is how Herr H. manipulated millions: by working them up into an emotional frenzy instead of appealing to their rational thought processes" [comment at source].

 

Moral Pornography and Narcissistic Virtue Signalling

"In one survey, only one in four people favoured taking in more than 10,000 refugees. In another, two-thirds said they were worried that the images of drowned children risked distorting the debate. Yet on social media and among our broadcasters and politicians, there's a very different consensus. In fact, people in these groups - often privileged, always fond of their own voices - have been competing with each other to insist we offer asylum to ever greater numbers. Those who haven't joined this collective orgy of emotion are condemned as immoral, cruel and stupid. ... [They] not only over-rate their own goodness and competence, but they also dangerously underrate the abilities and humanity of those who dare disagree with them" [source].

"[I]nfluential groups in society are exerting pressure - consciously or unconsciously - to stop [opposing] arguments, and the feelings behind them, being expressed. It's psychologically unhealthy for people to think they have no right to voice sincerely held convictions. And at a practical level, it's dangerously counterproductive for dissenting voices to be shouted down by a chorus of people desperate to show how caring they are" [source].

"I suppose it should not be a surprise that the virtue signalling over the appalling plight of Syrian refugees displaced by that country's monstrous civil war has bow reached fresh heights of absurdity. Nor that some of the press coverage of this dreadful crisis is edging towards a post-Diana level of mawkishness. One front page this morning shouts at David Cameron, demanding the Prime Minister SHOW YOUR HUMANITY. ... Then, on ITV's Murnaghan programme this morning, Nicola Sturgeon and Yvette Cooper were asked if they would house Syrian refugees in their own homes. Obviously they had to say yes and we may now expect the same question to be asked of every politician in Britain. If it's good enough for Nicola and Yvette - and Bob Geldof - then why isn't it good enough for you? ...  Can we agree this is ridiculous? True, nothing says I'm a pretty decent kind of person better than scribbling #RefugeesWelcome on a piece of paper and then posing for a selfie and posting said selfie on Twitter or Facebook. Twibbons are so yesterday, don't you know? I don't doubt the sincerity of the people behaving in this fashion. ... But let's at least try and recall the scale of the problem ... for how long are they prepared to host a family of Syrian refugees in their own property? Six weeks? Six months? Six years?" [source].

"We all know about the problem of sexual pornography on the internet. Now we need to talk about the problem of moral pornography. And nothing better illustrates it than the photo of Aylan, a three-year-old Syrian who drowned alongside his five-year-old brother Galip, his mother and others ... The global spreading of this snapshot - which appears on the front page of the Independent today and inside the Guardian, and is even callously being turned into a meme by sections of the weeping Twitterati - is justified as a way of raising awareness about the migrant crisis. Please. It's more like a snuff photo for progressives, dead-child porn, designed not to start a serious debate about migration in the 21st century but to elicit a self-satisfied feeling of sadness among Western observers. ... marvel at the purity of your emotional response to it, and be sure to tell everyone what your emotional response was. 'I cried so hard' thousands of tweeters are saying. The operative word being 'I'." [source].

"There's a tradition of pushing victimised or dead kids to the front of news reporting. And more recently they've been given a starring role in the Twitterati's handwringing over global calamities. ... the sad or hungry or dead child has become a substitute for serious analysis or rational commentary. It shuts down discussion. ... It's cheap moralism, emotionalism taking the place of thoughtfulness. ... This narcissistic search for outlets for our tenderness has increased a million-fold with the dawn of the internet, when not only can we gawp at more images of destitute, destroyed kids, but we can republish them too, signalling our virtue and emotional sensitivity. It can be cruel and unnecessary. it's the victory of the visceral over the rational. And we really need a rational debate about the migrant crisis, rather than people holding up a dead-child snuff photos and saying: 'I cried, therefore I'm good'" [source].

"These people are merely telling us about themselves. Public expressions of compassion signify that a person is good. Their absence demonstrates heartlessness. This has been called 'virtue signalling', or mandatory emoting, and it has now reached its crazy apotheosis in the great migration crisis" [source].

"[W]hen thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do ... in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily, I say unto you, They have their reward. But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth. That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly" [The Holy Bible, Matthew 6:2-4].

"I predicted this ten years and more ago. I was called 'mad' and all the rest - even 'scary' and 'dangerous'. Well it's happened now ... Class enjoy your assuaged borrowed guilt ... Call me what you like 'Liberals', but God - and He does exist - will call you a lot worse as will your progeny" [comment at source].

"A 30 week old baby died two weeks ago; his English mum and dad [were] left to live in a car by the local council ... We British must get off our rears ... Like the 1400 girls and boys in Rotherham, we just said 'How terrible!'  That is all we do daily. We will die saying 'Oh how terrible!'  No backbone left. ... While these disgusting prancing emotional feely-touchy vampires feed their habit and fixation of attention 'oooh look at me! I am wonderful!' we should be collecting their names for future arrest and trial if we come out of this awful evolving tragedy. Look at the placard these smug so and sos are holding? It is the same one. This is organised. Where were they when 1400 girls and boys were trafficked ad raped, even killed. No placard for the little boy dying in a car" [comment at source].

 

The Death of Aylan Kurdi

"[A] few inconvenient truths are conveniently overlooked: (a) the wife and the other son of that man also lost their lives, because life belts were only 'issued' to the men, the smugglers included; (b) this family, like so many others, were quite safe in refugee camps in Turkey, but had their immigrant application to Canada refused by the UN, that's why they tried to cross into the EU, i.e. Greece; (c) the despicable people smugglers demand hefty sums of money for their 'work' - nobody asks who pays and how come 'poor' refugees have so much money; (d) these 'refugees' in camps everywhere conveniently all have lost their passports - conveniently because thus they cannot be deported; (e) Suddenly those 'refugees' stuck in Hungary and elsewhere have miraculously 'found' their passports again - and are all Syrians - but ... the huge majority are actually people from Albania and Kosovo who want one thing only: get to Germany, to what they see as 'paradise'" [source].

"Having seen more than my share of real corpses, and watched children starving to death in a Somali famine, I am not unmoved by pictures of a dead child on a Turkish beach. But I am not going to be pretend to be more upset than anyone else. Nor am I going to suddenly stop thinking, as so many people in the media and politics appear to have done. The child is not dead because advanced countries have immigration laws. The child is dead because criminal traffickers cynically risked the lives of their victims in pursuit of money. I'll go further. The use of words such as 'desperate' is quite wrong in this case. The child's family were safe in Turkey. Turkey (for all its many faults) is a member of Nato, officially classified as free and democratic" [source].

This little boy "[A]llegedly 'loved' by everyone who wants to use his death for political reasons. His mother and aunt no doubt loved him, but I have grave doubts about his selfish father who put his whole family's lives at risk unnecessarily. ... every time there is resistance to taking more and more refugees into Europe, the little boy's name and death will be invoked relentlessly by those who care nothing for their own country's stability and security" [comment at source].

"Sad though the death of the small boy (now used to justify more immigration) was it is worth noting that his father has taken him home to be buried. So much for fleeing an inhospitable country. Time for common sense to prevail over the bleeding hearts; only one person was to blame for his death and it does not justify allowing thousands more aliens into our country" [comment at source].

"The kid died because his father wanted new teeth, paid for by his cousin in Canada - they thought the money transfer would be easier from Canada to the UK. He really should be charged with murder for putting his family's life at risk for such a superficial, unnecessary reason" [comment at source].

"In a manner familiar to students of faked and media-fanned 'Israeli atrocities' in Gaza, every image of a dead refugee child, or just one looking distressed, is used skilfully to express more tears from Europe's and America's lachrymose glands. The media has no interest in disclosing that the dead child's father is a smugger of 'refugees' who drove the unsafe boat himself" [source].

"Time to put away the picture of that kid, and look at the situation as it really is" [comment at source].

 

The Impact on Public Services

"It is entirely disingenuous for our leaders not to acknowledge that an influx of refugees has an impact on public services - not just in health, but in education, housing and welfare. What frustrates me is that the people so enthusiastically insisting that we welcome large numbers are not the ones who will feel the pain of all this. The Twitter hashtag mob will, largely, continue with their comfortable lives untouched. It's mostly the poor and the sick who will feel the impact of refugees coming into their community" [source].

"There are 52 million Muslims in Europe... 80% of them are on welfare. This system smacks of the socialist Cloward-Piven strategy of overwhelming the public welfare system in order to provoke a collapse, and replace it with a national system. Muslims are hoping that replacement system will be the Sharia Islamic legal system. ... We know this from interviews right here in the US, with non-US Muslims brought here by Obama at the directive of the UN" [source].

"The stark reality of mass immigration is that those who advocate taking in immigrants ... are stealing from the poorer of their own people. Let me list what they steal: (1) Employment, both by taking jobs and by reducing wages; (2) Housing, both by taking housing (including large amounts of social housing) and by forcing up house prices and private rents; (3) School opportunities, by both taking places and reducing the quality of the schooling available to the British children through larger classes and the extra time and money devoted to dealing with children who speak inadequate English; (4) University opportunities, both by immigrants taking places (especially in subjects such as medicine) and by the reduction in the quality of the education offered through immigrant students having poor English or by being simply intellectually inadequate. There is a strong venal incentive for universities to take larger numbers of such people because, unlike British and EU students, students from outside the EU pay the full cost of their courses. A large part of the university learning experience depends on student interaction both inside and outside the classroom. The poorer the quality of students, the less opportunity for the able student to learn because of the inability of inadequate students to express themselves intelligently; (5) Healthcare. GP's surgeries are being swamped in many areas because of immigration and anyone who has visited a NHS hospital recently in places such as London will have been astonished at the number of foreign patients there are" [source].

 

Operation 'Adopt a Muslim'

"Every one of the posturing notables simpering 'refugees welcome' should be asked if he or she will take a refugee family into his or her home for an indefinite period, and pay for their food, medical treatment and education. If so, they mean it. If not, they are merely demanding that others pay and make room so that they can experience a self-righteous glow. ... As William Blake rightly said: 'He who would do good to another must do it in minute particulars. General good is the plea of the scoundrel, hypocrite and flatterer'." [source].

"If those who advocated mass immigration had to pay a real price for their parading of their conscience you may be assured that their enthusiasm would vanish as quickly as the morning dew. What should be the price? Here are a couple of scenarios: (1) [T]hey should have to take responsibility for that person permanently. By that I mean not only house them but meet all their reasonable needs such as food, clothing, medical and educational costs. They should have no choice about who they are allocated, so there will be no choosing a westernised, well-educated immigrant or two who speak good English; (2) [Or they] and their immediate family [could experience] the conditions the poorer Britons experience. This would require that their family home be requisitioned and the advocate and his or her family moved to basic accommodation in an area absolutely brimming over with the diversity such people religiously extol as being so desirable. The income of the adults involved would be reduced to the bare minimum which the British state says is needed to live. Where there are children of school age, these would be sent to state-funded schools which boast '93 languages spoken here'. If healthcare is required they would have to use a local GP and the nearest appropriate NHS hospital" [source].

"[S]eeing as our political class, progressives and media are hellbent on stuffing this country full of Muslims I thought they could help promote 'community cohesion' by accepting some into their own homes. These Muslims should be chosen from the poorest areas of Pakistan and Somalia so that our politicians get the true flavour - there will be no entrepreneurs and comedians in this lot, let me tell you! I've often felt that our politicians are living in [a] bubble that protects them from reality, so this 'adopt a Muslim' strategy will educate them extremely quickly on what the rest of us have been putting up with. ... If we must accept new Muslim 'refugees that's fine by me just so long as our political class puts their money where their mouth is and take these people into their own homes. The public have been bearing the burden of mass immigration for way too long" [source].

"Congratulations on welcoming your first Muslim into you home! Here are some guidelines to help you adjust to this new situation:  (1) You should be aware that he thinks he is 'the best of people' (Koran 3:110) and you are 'filthy and unclean' (9:28) and of 'the worst of people' (98:6) - so you're off to a good start already!  (2) In the event that he rapes any of the female residents of your home (your wife, your daughter, your mother) just be aware all that is condoned in the Koran. Specifically, the passages relating to the rape of infidel women are 4;3, 4:24, and 33:50. Remember, only racist people get upset about what's written in the Koran!  (3) The Muslim has very specific guidelines on how to behave, as 64% of the Koran is devoted to telling him how to treat you, the infidel ... For example, 48:29 tells him 'Muslims are merciful to each other and are merciless towards the unbelievers', which must be a euphemism for love, tolerance and multiculturalism - right?  (4) Other chapters I would like to bring to your attention are 5:33, where he is instructed to cut one hand and one foot off opposite sides of a person's body for the vague crime of 'causing mischief', 5:45 which instructs him to tear a person's eyes out, 47:4 which tells him to cut your head off, and the many verses related to burning people alive. Again remember, only racist and intolerant people think there's anything wrong with this!" [source].

"Did Bob Geldoff actually take any in after his self-promoting offer? I would like to hear the experiences of any who do" [comment at source].

 

Zakat (The Third Pillar of Islam):
Islamic Charity/Aid Towards Other Muslims, Especially the Destitute

"Most, if not all of them, are Muslims. Why are they not fleeing to nearby muslim countries instead of making hazardous journeys to Europe, where there is rising tension with muslim populations?" [comment at source].

"[W]hy aren't filthy rich Saudi Arabia and other oil-rich muslim nations stepping forward to take refugees of their own faith?" [comment at source].

"Is it really such a novel idea that refugees from a Middle East civil war should be resettled in the Middle East, not Europe and America?" [source].

"Why are we allowing Saudi Arabia and several other wealthy Middle East nations to take in ZERO refugees? Why are Syrian, Iraqi and Libyan refugees not being resettled in wealthy neighboring countries instead of Europe and the US?" [source].

"Some will not like me saying this, but in recent years, there has been too much Muslim mass immigration to Europe. This has resulted in ghettos of Muslim communities living parallel lives to mainstream society, following their own customs and even their own laws. Isn't it high-time instead for the oil-rich Gulf States to open their doors to the many Muslims are are fleeing conflict? Surely if they are concerned for fellow Muslims who prefer to live in Muslim-majority countries, then they have a moral responsibility to intervene" [source].

"[T]wo key issues about Muslim refugees: one, we know that many of them are in fact jihadists seeking to get a free pass not the West to wage war against it. Two, there are plenty of wealthy Muslim nations in the immediate vicinity which are refusing to take in any refugees. Now that is the height of hypocrisy, and genuine discrimination. They refuse to take in their own, and some have even said the reason for this is because they are worried about terrorism! Why can Muslim nations be rightly worried about Muslim terrorism while Western nations are just supposed to turn a blind eye to all this, and take in anyone who demands to be let in? That of course is a recipe for national suicide" [source].

"Western media is reporting on the Muslim refugee crisis as a humanitarian problem that the West must deal with. But where are the media's questions about the huge financial and land resources available to oil-rich Arab and Muslim countries? Where are the Islamic solutions in this equation? The World is often lectured to about the urgency of respecting Arab and Islamic brotherly love, but where is the Arab action to rescue fellow Muslims and Arabs from the claws of ISIS?" [source].

"Where is the wealthy Arab League to coordinate safe cities on Arab land that extends from Morocco to Iraq and from Northern Syria to Sudan? ... Where are the mighty Arab armies who waged dozens of wars against Israel? Why aren't they fighting ISIS and building tent cities in the vast deserts of Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and the wealthy Gulf States? They are all claiming they are 'moderate' Muslims and that they are against ISIS. But [what] is one substantive thing that have done?" [source].

"Where are the thousands of Islamic human rights groups operating in the West, the likes of CAIR and ISNA, who are dedicating their energy and millions of dollars to stop discrimination against Muslims and 'Islamophobia' in the West? This is the same West that their refugees are escaping to" [source].

"Where are the Arab feminists, especially those who demonstrated against France for banning the hijab? They are silent and doing nothing to rescue thousands of women that are victims of Islamic jihadist rape and enslavement. The only compassionate women helping women in the Middle East are the Christian mother [sic] Teresas and Kayla Muellers of the western world" [source].

"Arab countries lack compassion and action to rescue each other despite the rhetoric of Arab/Islamic unity. Saudi Arabia and Gulf nations never open their borders to poor Muslims in distress. Even Egypt rejected the Darfur refugees who were later forced to go to Israel, which took them in" [source].

"Arabs would rather spend their petrodollars on expanding their influence in the West ... than making life better for their own citizens or supporting other Muslim nations who are financially less fortunate" [source].

"Islamic groups believe that refugees from Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan will spread Sharia in Europe, which is the main goal of jihad. ... Life and saving lives and avoiding human tragedy are not more important than jihad in Arab culture" [source].

"We are told that the Syrian refugees 'stir the conscience' of the world; certainly not the Muslim world. The Saudis don't want them. Jordan and Turkey have resentfully set up refugee camps without actually offering permanent legal status to them the way that Europe, Canada and America are expected to. What do Muslim countries know about the Syrian Civil War that we don't? The Saudis, Jordanians and Turks have their own problems. They don't want to import the Syrian Civil War into their own borders. Only the Western countries are stupid enough to do that" [source].

"Curious ... that instead of any of the 56 Islamic countries taking in Muslim 'refugees' it is somehow Europe's responsibility to take these people in... despite the hundreds of thousands of Muslims we already accept every year, and despite the billions of pounds we have poured into Muslim countries to assuage our 'white guilt' or something. I'm still not clear on the reasons we throw taxpayers' money at Islamic nations while neglecting our own people at home. Shouldn't our own people be our first responsibility" [source].

"The United Nations - in various ways a branch of the 57-nation Organization of Islamic Cooperation - issues daily appeals to Europe to do 'more', to engage in a 'massive common effort', despite the curious, total absence of any fabulously rich Muslim state from this humanitarian effort on behalf of Muslims being persecuted by other Muslims" [source].

 

ISIS Jihadis (and Other 'Non-Desirables') Posing as Refugees

"Islamic State is using the refugee crisis to form a fifth column of Muslim fighters inside Western nations. ... 'Jihad is not only a violent phenomenon but can be pursued by many other means, including hijra.' Isis operatives are taking advantage of Western nations' generosity toward refugees to infiltrate Europe" [source].

"The ranks of the refugees include possible war criminals like Abu Hussein, the commander of a Free Syrian Army militia named the Falcons of the Tribe of the Prophet Mohammed, who controls portions of a UNHCR refugee camp and threatens to kill aid workers when they won't give him what he wants. The bleeding hearts of Europe and America want to take in the cute kiddies, but they'll be getting the Husseins instead who will be running neighborhoods in London, Paris and Toronto. And then the kindly natives will notice that their daughters are coming home late and wonder what is happening to them. Syria will happen to them. Just as Pakistan and Afghanistan happened to the British girls victimised by the Muslim sex grooming gangs in the UK. Just as Saudi Arabia happened to us on September 11" [source].

"A popular meme claims that the UK has taken in only enough refugees to fit on a subway train. My question to the meme spreaders is how would they like to be on that train, wedged between the terrorists, the sex groomers and the Sunnis and Shiites trying to reach across and throttle each other" [source].

"What about the national security implications? We know that ISIS is actively placing jihadists among the hundreds of thousands of Syrian migrants. It is imperative to ask - how many additional thousand Islamist jihadists are we prepared to accept after the UN refugee agency fails to screen them them out? The FBI has said that it does not have the tools or the manpower to screen the refugees. Asking them to do so is insane. ... If [Congress] can't say no to 10,000 jihadist-infiltrated refugees, they should just resign, close up shop and go home" [source].

"These so-called Muslim refugees overwhelming Europe are heard chanting what Jihadists often do: 'Allahu Akbar'. ... Muslim Jihadis are mixing into secular Muslim populations that are pouring into Western nations" [source].

"Most of these asylum seekers are mainly Muslim men of military age, and they will sabotage Germany, reducing it to civil war. Instead of smoothly running factories, there will be bombings, and riots in the streets. When Germany goes up in flames again, it will be because of the betrayal of Germans by their own degenerate, treacherous leaders" [comment at: source].

"It's our dream that there should be a caliphate not only in Syria but in all the world and we will have it soon, [Allah] willing. They are going like refugees. Others just go to Europe to be ready" [ISIS operative, quoted at: source].

 

A Sense of Entitlement - And Hijrah

"[I]f they are really fleeing from a greater danger than the one presented by dangerous boat journeys, why did the ones who landed in Greece insist on barging into Hungary, where they are now making such a fuss about going to Germany? Shouldn't people fleeing from war zones just be glad to be out of them without making demands about precisely where they want to end up?" [comment at source].

"It is awful to see bewildered, crying children, but why are they being dragged into dangerous, frightening and uncertain situations by their parents? Is it really because the place they've come from is even more intolerable? If so, why do they spurn the refuge they are given where they land and insist on travelling much further, through borders and barbed wire, to reach the northern countries such as Germany or the UK? [comment at source].

"You really think these crowds of young men chanting 'Germany!' in the heart of Budapest are 'asylum-seekers' or 'refugees'? Refugees don't confront the police of the countries in which they seek sanctuary. They don't chant orchestrated slogans or lie across train tracks. And why, by the way, do they use the English name for Germany when they chant? In Arabic and Turkish, that country is called 'Almanya', in Kurdish something similar. The Germans themselves call it 'Deutschland'. In Hungarian, it's 'Nemetorszag'. Did someone hope that British and American TV would be there? I've said it before, and I'll say it again: spontaneous demonstrations take a lot of organising. Refugees don't demand or choose their refuge. They ask and they hope. When we become refugees one day (as we may well do), we will discover this. As to what those angry, confident and forceful young men actually are, I'll leave you to work it out, as I am too afraid of the Thought Police to use what I think is the correct word" [source].

"It is easy to be swayed by photos of a young child who has died or boatloads crammed to the gunnels with miserable looking people to the point where the resolution to defend your native territory is overridden, but look at the aggression and sense of entitlement [of] the invaders, for that is what they are, as they battle to leave Hungary. They are in the position of supplicants but far from begging for help they demand as a right that they be let into the richer countries of Europe" [source].

"The two Eritrean refugees that were chopping peoples' heads off in a Swedish IKEA recently were also not 'timid souls fleeing war and persecution'. To let any Muslims into a civilised country is highly dangerous and does nothing to stem the cause of these religious wars. By allowing this mass migration you are simply moving war to Europe" [comment at source].

"A picture paints a thousand words... these pictures we're seeing are of cheating lying scroungers playing the political correctness card game. And Europe have fallen for it hook line and sinker. Won't be long now until mass beheadings and assaults are rife throughout Europe. How stupid the EU have been with all their big ideas and policies and rules. It's tripped them up this time" [comment at source].

"I think those fit young men would be better fighting for their country rather than looking for a soft life, benefits, housing, etc..." [comment at source].

"Look at them with their mobile phones, self-portraits and V-signs. Imagine it's the year 1939 and Axis-pact military forces have taken over most of Europe and are massing to invade us. Then imagine what would have happened if thousands of able-bodied young British men had chosen to get into boats and flee to America instead of standing up to fight for their country. Imagine what would have happened to our cities if the brave, outnumbered pilots of the RAF had elected to fly West over the Atlantic rather than stay and confront the Luftwaffe hordes. You all know the answers" [comment at source].

"The head of a UNHCR camp called Syrian refugees 'The most difficult refugees I've ever seen.'  In Bulgaria, they complained that there were no jobs. In Sweden, they took off their clothes to protest that it was too cold. In Italy, Muslim African 'refugees' rejected pasta and demanded food from their own countries. But the cruel Europeans who 'mistreat' migrants set up a kitchen in Calais with imported spices cooked by a Michelin chef determined to give them the stir-fried rabbit and lamb meatballs they're used to. There are also mobile phone charging stations so the destitute refugees can check on their Facebook accounts. It had to be done because the refugees in Italy were throwing rocks at police while demanding free WiFi. This is the tawdry sense of entitlement of the Syrian Muslim refugee that the media champions" [source].

"Hussein said: 'We have the feeling that the aid workers are heartless.'  (He) lives in a trailer that cost $3,000. The air-conditioner runs with electricity he is tapping from the Italian hospital. The water for his tea is from canisters provided by UNICEF. He hasn't worked, paid or thanked anyone for any of it. And why would he? He's entitled to it by virtue of his superiority as a Muslim and our inferiority as infidels. There is no sense of gratitude. Only constant demands as if the people who drove out their own Christians and Jews have some moral claim on the charity of the Christians and Jews of the West" [source].

"This is no longer just a 'refugee crisis'. This is a hijrah. Hijrah is the Islamic doctrine of migration, which is a form of stealth jihad" [source].

See also the section: The Doctrine of Immigration (Al-Hijra) here for more on the Islamic doctrine of Hijrah.

 

What About Christian (and Other) Refugees?

"Recently the media has been playing on our heart strings telling us we need to let even more Muslim 'refugees' and immigrants into our country. Funny how it's rarely Christian, Hindu or Buddhist refugees that we're accepting - you know, the people who actually are being persecuted in many countries" [source].

"Today Christians who are being persecuted in a barbaric fashion in Syria deserve Christian countries ... to act fast to help them" [Polish Prime Minister Ewa Kopacz, quoted at: source].

"Where are the genuine refugees, the Iraqi and Syrian Christians at risk of murder by Isil? When did we last see a Christian refugee family featured in the media? Or do Syrian Christian women wear the hijab? If we had not imported 8 million unnecessary immigrants already, we would have plenty of room for terrorised Christians. That would be the truly humanitarian response: rigorously screen the migrants, accept only the Christians (the policy adopted by Cyprus) and send the Muslims to the rich Islamic states such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar, who are not known to have taken in a single refugee. If Shiite Muslims are in danger from Isil, let Iran admit its co-religionists" [source].

"Christians in the Middle East have been crucified, beheaded, raped, forcibly converted and ethnically cleansed. Yet our government has so far refused requests to grant asylum to Christians trying to flee Iraq and Syria. With few exceptions such as Poland and the Czech Republic, Europe's Christian countries are shunning Christian refugees from Islamist terror while opening their borders to hundreds of thousands of Muslims. Hungary's prime minister, Viktor Orban, has said Europe should only let in Christians. For that, he has been denounced as a Nazi. But this lemming-like attitude will itself ensure that the spectre of fascism in Europe becomes a reality" [source].

"Almost all of the migrants flooding into Europe are Muslims. Most of the Christians have been hiding in churches and homes in the Middle East, afraid to venture to the UN refugee camps which tend to be managed by Muslims. ... David Miliband, CEO of the New York City-based IRC, demanded ... that the U.S. accept 65,000 Syrian refugees by the end of President Obama's term in office. Miliband's organization made no mention of the persecuted Christians in Syria" [source].

"[T]he frustration for those of us who have been calling for compassion for Syrian victims for many months is that the Christian community is yet again left at the bottom of the heap. ... Mr Cameron's policy inadvertently discriminates against the very Christian communities most victimised by the inhuman butchers of the so-called Islamic State. Christians are not to be found in the UN camps, because they have been attacked and targeted by Islamists and driven from them. They are seeking refuge in private homes, church buildings and with neighbours and family" [source].

"[Christians] are the most vulnerable and repeatedly targeted victims of this conflict. Indeed, a Hundred years after the Armenian and Assyrian genocide, in which over a million Christians are estimated to have been killed by Ottoman Muslims, the same is happening today in the form of an ethnic cleansing of Christians in the region. Christians have been crucified, beheaded, raped, and subjected to forced conversion. The so-called Islamic State and other radical groups are openly glorifying the slaughter of Christians" [source].

"Britain should make Syrian Christians a priority because they are a particularly vulnerable group. Furthermore, we are a Christian nation with an established Church so Syrian Christians will find no challenge to integration. The churches are already well-prepared and eager to offer support and accommodation to those escaping the conflict" [source].

"[T]he Muslim world is exporting its instability to Europe, via a mass exodus of people. What can [we] do? There is nothing we can do about the ancient Sunni-Shia schism, but we can protect those who have become collateral damage - Christians. ... For the past 20 years Christians have been ethnically cleansed across much of the Middle East as part of the rise of Muslim militancy. In Syria, before the civil war, more than 1 million Syrian Christians lived in security and were better educated than the general population. That number has been decimated. In Iraq, the number of Christians has plunged from 1.4 million to about 250,000 over the past 40 years, displaced by waves of civil war, invasion and ethnic cleansing. Most Christians who remain live in the Kurdish-controlled area. Another 300,000 Christians live under the Islamic theocracy of Iran. Most are ethnically Armenian or Assyrian. Would it be a breach of our discrimination laws to prioritise Christians are refugees? No. I've checked. About 1 million Arab Christians are currently displaced and have no chance of returning to safety and normalcy in their own countries. Unlike displaced Muslims they have no diaspora in the region to absorb them" [source].

"There are Christians and non-Muslim minorities who are genuine refugees, but the two Muslim sects whose militias are murdering each other are not victims, they are perpetrators. Just because Sunnis are running from a Shiite militia or Shiites from a Sunni militia right now doesn't make them victims. The moment that their side's militia wins and begins slaughtering the other side, the oppressed will become the oppressors. Such shifts have already taken place countless times in this conflict. The refugees aren't fleeing a dictator, they're fleeing each other while carrying the hateful ideologies that caused this bloodshed with them. ... Muslim migrants are murdering Christian refugees on the journey over. And this is only the beginning. ... Slovakia has announced that it ill only take in Christian refugees and that's the right thing to do. Christians are the real victims of this Muslim conflict. The vast majority of the refugees, many of whom aren't even Syrians, aren't. The rest of Europe should use Slovakia's refugee policy as a model" [source].

"Are Syrians being moved to the front of the line among the millions of displaced persons across the globe? Why? Why are they more deserving than Africans fleeing tribal butchery, Coptic Christians driven from their homes in Egypt and Libya, Ukrainians fleeing Russian Reconquista, or Venezuelans escaping Marxist militarism?" [source].

"The REAL refugees of ISIS (Christians) are being denied access in Western countries (except Poland), while Muslim Jihadis are mixing into secular Muslim populations that are pouring into Western nations" [source].

"First thing is to find the Christian refugees, get them out before they arte slaughtered by the 99% muslims. Bring them to the UK as a priority. This can easily be justified as the first and easiest step in processing the remainder. These people have been systematically [eradicated] by the muslim hordes in a genocide against christians. A couple of simple questions to identify them as non-muslim Christian Syrian refugees: (1) Do you believe Jesus is the Son of God? (2) Was Jesus crucified, did he die on a cross and was he resurrected? (3) Was Abu al-Qasim Muhammad ibn 'Abd Allah ibn 'Abd al-Muttalib ibn Hashim a rapist and a murderer? 2 out of  3 correct answers will suffice"   /   "Don't forget many muslims are converting to Christianity to get into Europe. Also, as Christians, they are less likely to be deported to a muslim country (apostasy = death) although they will, of course, secretly convert back to Islam once papers are given over"           [comments at: source]. [Note from Bayith: As this second comment suggests, Westerners need to familiarise themselves with the Islamic doctrine of Taqiyya: 'Permissible Lying' which is an aspect of Sharia especially authorised for use with unbelievers in order to further the spread of Islam into the Dar-al-Harb (the House of War; i.e. non-Muslim nations).]

"Sweden: Iraqi Christians are being systematically expelled back to Iraq (and certain death) by the Swedish government. The United States: Assyrian Christian refugees have been denied Visas by the US State Dept., while thousands of Muslims (non-refugees) are accepted. Only one nation, having tasted the cruelty of a totalitarian system has opened wide its borders to Christian refugees: that sanctuary is Poland. May the rest of the West find the mercy and compassion of the Polish people towards Christian victims of Muslim persecution. And may we do it before we stain our souls again with the blood of innocents. A stain that may NEVER be removed" [source].

 

The Eradication of Christianity in the West

"Those arriving have been raised in another religion and represent a radically different culture. Most of them are not Christians, but Muslims. This is an important question because Europe and European identity is rooted in Christianity. Is it not worrying in itself that European Christianity is now barely able to keep Europe Christian? If we lose sight of this, the idea of Europe could become a minority interest in its own continent. There is no alternative, and we have no option but to defend our borders" [source].

"To defend Christianity today is to violate the ultimate taboo of the Brussels multiculturalists and the forces of political correctness that promote mass immigration for precisely the objective of eradicating Europe's Christian identity. [Viktor] Orban [PM of Hungary] and his Fidesz party have long been a target for demonisation by the cultural Marxist left, ever since it gave Hungary an admirable new constitution. When Hillary Clinton, the New York Times, the United Nations and the Brussels kleptocracy all denounce a nation, it is a clear sign that it is doing something good" [source].

"So, the transformation of this country by mass migration, begun by New Labour to rub the Right's nose in diversity, has now moved up a gear. One in eight of us was born abroad - and how long before that's one in six, then one in four? These people are not (as I am) the children of British subjects born while overseas. They are people who have grown up in a different culture. Never before in our history have we faced the task of integrating a minority so large. Never before have we had such a feeble idea of what being British is. And yet people ask me, as if the idea were absurd, why I think this will be a Muslim country within a couple of generations. I can think of no force or idea or movement or faith more likely to prosper in the state to come. Like all other civilisations which lost their nerve and the will to live, European Christianity is destined to become a minority in its own territory. By the way, if you don't like this, and voted Tory at the last Election, you have no business complaining. I told you repeatedly that the Tory concern about immigration was faked. They don't want the power to stop it" [Peter Hitchens, Mail on Sunday, 30 August 2015].

"I've come to the conclusion that some people are so bent on destroying Christianity that they will even choose the most illogical and dangerous ideas to justify it" [source].

"And still, Europe, like a Japanese mother taking her brood with her as she suicides by drowning, is deliberately entering a roiling tide, firmly grasping her children. The difference between the two is that Europe lies, and is so perverse in her deed that she cares more about alien children than she cares about her own that she is about to drown. America, competing for 'progressive' creds with Europe, watches the advancing wall of water with yearning and curses the Gun Nuts, Bible Freaks and White 'Racists' who still hamper her with fraying cords" [source].

 

The Betrayal of Our Nations

"This project will require the unending expansion of the State government into all areas of communal life as they have set up a situation of continual, never-ending conflict, until people resign themselves in despair to their new status ... It is not surprising that it is the Eastern European nations who see the writing on the wall. Their experience under Communist tyranny is still within living memory" [comment at source].

"These politicians are owed nothing any more neither are we obliged to obey them anymore. They have betrayed us and future generations. They are duty bound to defend and protect but instead they have liberally attacked and intentionally destroyed this country and its people. these are crimes. They are criminals as are their feckless supporters. traitors one and all" [comment at source].

 

The Islamic Doctrine of Razzia and the Dhimmitude of the 'Humanitarian' Left

The following extracts are from the article: The Koranic Rape Epidemic and Silence

"The migrants are young males who were raised on the Koran, from childhood on up, which teaches without ambiguity that women are inferior and that their own supremacy should be affirmed through violence, first to the little girl, then to the wife ... Mohammed also told them that non followers of Islam were 'kaffir' and their women were 'whores' ... How would they view the 30 year old British woman who is dedicating herself to helping them? ... not only bring[ing] them food, clothing, cell phones, etc, but verbal and emotional support. Surely they would see that she is on their side, especially when it came time to helping plot how to outsmart the police and make it, illegally, into either her country, or to other countries that have enticed them with free money. Her European appearance was visibly different from the men and her purpose was to help them without respect to difference in appearance, nationality, or beliefs" ...

One Saturday night answered this question for her and us, and forever changed the European woman's life, but for the Islamic males, it would be just another Saturday night in Europe. As the music played loudly at a nearby park, the woman walked freely among the migrants she had thus served, day by day, and night by night, befriending them, enhancing the quality of their lives, and for them, affirming their own superiority, when a group of them cornered her near the showers she and her group had set up for them. To them, she was not only 'woman' but 'kaffir', that is, 'unclean', beneath the status of a dog; and not wearing the veil, and they, as a group, acted according to what the Koran told them: They violently gang raped her, one after the other ... In the clash of ideologies, one of 'no borders, no nations, no racist deportations' and the dedication to serving the man, and the other of 'you are supreme, and the woman is kaffir, take what your right hand finds' supremacy and prescribed rape, the brutality prevailed" ...

"When they finished with her, she went to report the crime when she was met by her colleagues, ... who told her that if she told what had happened, it would damage 'their cause' and dreams of a world without borders, nations, ... Like John Lennon singing, 'imagine no possessions' while having a refrigerated closet for for his mink coats, the irony stood out starkly to the victim: The one compulsion that every rape victim shares is to be heard and not silenced. The one mandate from all of the utopian [Liberals] is to enforce the cause by all means. Which drive was more powerful? Would it be the cause of ultimate socialism, where even lying with statistics is done to protect Islam? Or, would the bare basic but powerful need to be heard from one so horribly violated prevail?

"They choked her into silence by their bullying tactics, which is to enforce Sharia blasphemy laws over her own God given instinct to cry out for justice" ...

"Finally, the urge to be heard won the contest of the wills, and she reported the gang rape at the hands of migrant Islamist [sic] supremacists from Africa. What her colleagues did next was unthinkable but quite predictable. ... It was unthinkable because of the severity of its cruelty, coming, at least seemingly, from those who consider themselves 'humanitarians'. It was predictable because we have learned: the narrative trumps the truth. ... They openly accused her of making the criminal report of gang rape out of 'spite'.

"What is a 'spite report' of rape? Her colleagues re-victimised her, or 'raped her' all over again. ... She, and everyone who loves her, will suffer for the rest of their days. The rapists? They simply did what their religion tells them."

[End of Extract]

 

Identity Politics

"This is not a fight against Islam. It is a fight against European Fascist-Marxism. There is absolutely no difference between the two. Meanwhile, European culture has been gutted by Post-Modern 'victim'-obsessed PC indoctrination which has already warped the minds of the young" [comment at: source].

The following extracts are from the article: The Origin of 'Identity Politics' & 'Political Correctness'

"Identity politics (sometimes dubbed 'political correctness') is the result of a political-Left major backlash against the mass of ordinary people (in Europe and 'the West'), beginning in the 1920s/30s, in the wake of the persistent failure of Marxist theory to be realised in European 'revolution' or any real change through democracy. In shifting the blame away from Marxist theory and those gullible enough to adhere to it, and on to those the theory had prescribed and predicted would have been the beneficiaries, if only they had responded accordingly ('the [white, male] workers'); then the cognitive-dissonance within the political-left mindset caused by this crisis to an extent was salved"

"As with any fervent ideology, a hallmark of the political-Left is interpreting anything and everything in its own ideological terms to claim as a manifestation of the ideology and its prophecy - jumping on a bandwagon, so to speak; though here only to hijack it. The bandwagon here was, of course, the American civil rights movement, which though enjoying ubiquitous support within black communities - to the point often of various forms of extremism - featured virtually nil endorsement of socialism ... It is from the time of this co-option that 'identity politics' dates; many considering that the movement was incorporated into the Left in the wake of King's assassination in 1968 - the major turning-point year in political-Left politics generally"

"'Civil rights', as the first great 'single-issue' campaign, served not least to provide an acceptable cloak for the Left to avoid provoking a resurgence of McCarthyism. The major social upheaval of 'civil rights' with its large-scale and widespread rioting was easily the nearest thing in then recent US history to look like the promised Marxist 'revolution', and obviously was just the practical application the 'theory' was seeking. Moreover, the protagonists (black Americans) were eminently separable form the now despised 'workers' per se, in being presentable as a new 'group; from outside of the former fray of 'boss' versus 'worker'."

"This accident of history served to add 'black' to 'woman' as 'the new oppressed' ... 'The worker' in effect was retrospectively stereotyped as both 'man' and 'white'. With the inverse of this stereotype of 'white' being not just 'black American' but 'black' - that is, ethnic-minority generically ... so it was that the new 'agents of social change' / 'disadvantaged' / 'oppressed' were extended from women to also include all ethnic minorities"

"It is only with the knowledge of how this developed that sense can be made of why ethnicity is held above the myriad other possible differences that could be utilised as in-group markers, when in fact there is nothing inherent in ethnicity as an in-group marker to produce inter-group prejudice that is particularly more pernicious"

"Indeed, the worst inter-communal conflicts nominally between different ethnicities usually are between different cultural heritages with no discernible 'racial' differences of any kind - and what (non-ethnic) differences there are can be minimal; the lack of contrast actually fuelling the intensity of conflict, such is the need for groups to feel distinguished from each other"

"Furthermore, ethnic prejudice is anything but restricted to or even predominantly 'white' on 'black': inter-ethnic (eg, 'black' on Asian) and ethnic-on-'white' 'racism' can be, often is and may usually be the greater problem; and a negative attitude to a certain ethnicity does not imply a similar attitude to other ethnicities"

"The specific US experience, given the highly divisive politics in the wake of the American Civil War over the basis of the Southern US economy in African slavery, does not translate to elsewhere; notably not to Europe - as was starkly evidenced in the experience of World War II 'black' American GIs stationed in England in how they were favourably received by locals, who sided with them when discriminated against"

"'Racial divides' in European 'white' host countries are the result not of mutual antipathy but affiliative forces, principally within migrant enclaves and secondarily within the 'host' community; in both cases being through in-group 'love', not out-group 'hate'" [Note from Bayith: though the latter part of this observation is indeed true in normal circumstances, this does not, of course, take account of the Islamic/Koranic doctrines of Al-Hijra (Immigration), Taqiyya (Lying and Deceit), and Razzia/Ghazwa (Rape and Slavery), Dawa (Cultural and Stealth Jihad), and Terrorist and Violent Jihad, carried out by fundamentalist Muslims as they settle in increasing numbers in Western countries with the sole and deliberate purpose of making every remaining Dar al-Harb ('house of war': i.e. any non-Muslim country) into a Dar al-Islam ('house of submission': i.e all Muslim countries) until Islam finally achieves its longed-for global Caliphate.]

[End of Extract]

 

The Burden Which Habakkuk the Prophet Did See:

The righteous cry out for God's punishment of the injustice in their lands:
O LORD, how long shall I cry, and thou wilt not hear! even cry out unto thee of violence, and thou wilt not save!
Why dost thou show me iniquity, and cause me to behold grievance? for spoiling and violence are before me: and there are that raise up strife and contention.
Therefore the law is slacked, and judgment doth never go forth: for the wicked doth compass about the righteous; therefore wrong judgment proceedeth.

The LORD God answers:
Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you.
For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwelling places that are not theirs.
They are terrible and dreadful: their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves.
Their horses also are swifter than the leopards, and are more fierce than the evening wolves:
And their horsemen shall spread themselves, and their horsemen shall come from far; they shall fly as the eagle that hasteth to eat.
They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.
And they shall scoff at the kings, and the princes shall be a scorn unto them: they shall deride every strong hold; for they shall heap dust, and take it.
Then shall his mind change, and he shall pass over, and offend, imputing this his power unto his god.

The dismay of the righteous at God's answer:   
Art thou not from everlasting, O LORD my God, mine Holy One? we shall not die.
O LORD, thou hast ordained them for judgment; and, O mighty God, thou hast established them for correction.
Thou art of purer eyes than to behold evil, and canst not look on iniquity:
Wherefore lookest thou upon them that deal treacherously, and holdest thy tongue when the wicked devoureth the man that is more righteous than he?
They take up all of them with the angle, they catch them in their net, and gather them in their drag: therefore they rejoice and are glad.
Therefore they sacrifice unto their net, and burn incense unto their drag; because by them their portion is fat, and their meat plenteous.
Shall they therefore empty their net, and not spare continually to slay the nations?
I will stand upon my watch, and set me upon the tower, and will watch to see what he will say unto me, and what I shall answer when I am reproved.

The LORD God's reassurance to the righteous:
And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.
For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry.
Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith

[Habakkuk 1:1-2:4]

 

 

 

___________________

 

 

 

The Frankfurt School

"The Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution.

Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the 'oppressive' order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus - 'continuing the work of Western Marxists by other means' as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their 'quiet' cultural revolution ... the [Frankfurt] School recommended (among other things):

(1) the creation of racism offences,
(2) continual change to create confusion,
(3) the teaching of sex and homosexuality to children,
(4) the undermining of schools' and teachers' authority,
(5) huge immigration to destroy identity,
(6) the promotion of excessive drinking,
(7) emptying of churches,
(8) an unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime,
(9) dependency on the state or state benefits,
(10) control and dumbing down of media,
(11) encouraging the breakdown of the family.

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud's idea of 'pansexualism' - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

(a) attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children,
(b) abolish differences in the education of boys and girls,
(c) abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces,
(d) declare women to be an 'oppressed class' and men as 'oppressors'."

 

 

 

 

"Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil;
that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"
(Isaiah 5:20-21)

"Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together,
against the LORD, and against His anointed, saying:
'Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.'
He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD shall have them in derision"
(Psalm 21:1-4)

"Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried;
but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand;
but the wise shall understand"
(Daniel 12:10)

 

 

 

 

The European Union Migrant Crisis Articles

Multiculturalism, Immigration, Racism General Articles and Quotations Pages

Political Correctness Articles Pages

Websites and Recommended Materials    |    Scripture References

Education    |    Islam    |    The Front Of It (Chart)    |    The Front Of It (Documentation)

Bayith BTR Articles    |    How To Support Bayith Ministries